Anosmia and ageusia good prognosis factors of COVID-19?

Author(s):  
Sarra Maazaoui ◽  
arbia chaieb ◽  
Sonia Habibech ◽  
Tasnim Zneigui ◽  
Mariem Friha ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (46) ◽  
pp. 53-58
Author(s):  
Geninho Thomé ◽  
Marcos Boaventura de Moura ◽  
Jean Uhlendorf ◽  
Carolina Accorsi Cartelli ◽  
Larissa Carvalho Trojan ◽  
...  

Tooth loss can occur due to several factors including dental caries. Immediate replacement of posterior teeth with dental implants facilitates to plan and to obtain consistent results with good prognosis. Factors such as minimally traumatic extraction, primary implant stability, maintenance of proximal bone ridges, buccal and lingual bone plates, in addition to a temporary or customizable component for tissue stabilization are important parameters to make the case predictable. The immediate technique for implants placement in the posterior regions has been described in the literature since the 1990s, presenting a high success rate and predictability of patients rehabilitation with shorter waiting times and maintenance of soft and bone tissue architecture. This study reports a clinical case of extraction of an upper molar tooth (26) with dental caries and placement of an extra-wide diameter implant, followed by filling of the surgical alveolar socket with bioactive calcium phosphate ceramic and placement of a customizable healing abutment. Clinical and radiographic control was performed after 8 months with success, with maintenance of soft tissue and marginal bone.


2017 ◽  
Vol 213 (10) ◽  
pp. 1296-1301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongyan Cai ◽  
Xiaohong Wu ◽  
Tingting Hong ◽  
Yong Mao ◽  
Xiaosong Ge ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4097-4097 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Tournigand ◽  
G. Lledo ◽  
J. Delord ◽  
T. André ◽  
F. Maindrault-Goebel ◽  
...  

4097 Background: Targeted therapy against VEGF and EGFR both demonstrated clinical activity in combination with chemo in MCRC. In 1st line, B with Folfox or Xelox increase progression-free survival (Cassidy ESMO 2006). In 2nd L, B with Folfox increases overall survival (Giantonio 2005). In this preliminary study, a double inhibition is tested combining mFolfox+B or mXelox+B with or without E, an oral EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Methods: 38 pts with untreated MCRC were randomly assigned to: mFolfox+B (1A), mFolfox+B+E (1B), mXelox+B (2A) or mXelox+B+E (2B). mFolfox-B=LV 400 mg/m2, Oxaliplatin (ox) 100 mg/m2, B 5 mg/kg day 1, 5FUc 2.4- 3g/m2 46h q2w, mXelox-B=Ox 100 mg/m2 d1 q2w, capecitabine 3–3.5 g/m2 d1 to 7 q2w, B 5mg/kg q2w. Erlotinib=100 mg/day. 6 cy planned. The primary end-points were toxicity and RR. Results : 9pts/41cy in 1A, 10/60 (1B), 9/39 (2A), 10/44 (2B). Median age 62yrs (43–78). 24/38 pts had poor prognosis factors (>1 met. site and/or PS2, LDH>3N, elevated alk Ph): 5, 6, 7, 6 in each arm respectively. 17 pts had a gr3- 4 toxicity: 4/9 arm 1A, 4/10 arm 1B, 2/9 arm 2A, 7/10 arm 2B. Diarrhea (dia) was the main gr3–4 tox: 2/10pts in 1B, 1/9 in 2A & 6/10 in 2B. 3 pts had gr4 dia in arm 2B. Other gr3 tox were nausea-vomiting 4pts (2/0/0/2), cutaneous rash 2 pts (0/1/0/1), hypertension 1 pt (1B), mucositis 1pt (1A), neutropenia 1 pt (1A), thrombocytopenia 1 pt (1A). 1pt had a gr4 venous thrombosis (2A) and 1pt had pulmonary embolism. 1pt died with perforation in arm 1A, and 1pt died with gr4 dia in arm 2B. Amongst the 17pts with gr3–4 toxicity, 11 pts had poor prognosis criteria and 6 had good prognosis. PR, SD, PD and NE are respectively: arm 1A: 5/2/0/2, 1B: 4/6/0/0, 2A:5/3/1/0, 2B:4/3/0/3. Conclusion: The results of this feasibility phase indicate that adding E with mXelox and bevacizumab increases toxicity (70% gr3–4) and is not feasible. Based on these results, the DREAM study was redesigned to evaluate erlotinib in maintenance with B after 6 cycles of mXelox-B or mFolfox-B. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2014 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Ingels ◽  
Guillaume Ploussard ◽  
Yves Allory ◽  
Claude Abbou ◽  
Alexandre de la Taille ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. M. Sánchez-Martín ◽  
F. Millán-Rodríguez ◽  
G. Urdaneta-Pignalosa ◽  
J. Rubio-Briones ◽  
H. Villavicencio-Mavrich

Introduction. The small renal masses (SRMs) have increased over the past two decades due to more liberal use of imaging techniques. SRMs have allowed discussions regarding their prognostic, diagnosis, and therapeutic approach.Materials and methods.Clinical presentation, incidental diagnosis, and prognosis factors of SRMs are discussed in this review.Results.SRMs are defined as lesions less than 4 cm in diameter. SRM could be benign, and most malignant SMRs are low stage and low grade. Clinical symptoms like hematuria are very rare, being diagnosed by chance (incidental) in most cases. Size, stage, and grade are still the most consistent prognosis factors in (RCC). An enhanced contrast SRM that grows during active surveillance is clearly malignant, and its aggressive potential increases in those greater than 3 cm. Clear cell carcinoma is the most frequent cellular type of malign SRM.Conclusions.Only some SRMs are benign. The great majority of malign SRMs have good prognosis (low stage and grade, no metastasis) with open or laparoscopic surgical treatment (nephron sparing techniques). Active surveillance is an accepted attitude in selected cases.


2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
MIRIAM E. TUCKER
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Huppke ◽  
M Blüthner ◽  
O Bauer ◽  
W Stark ◽  
K Reinhardt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document