scholarly journals The multiple sclerosis relapse experience: patient-reported outcomes from the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry

BMC Neurology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly Nickerson ◽  
Ruth Ann Marrie
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 269-275
Author(s):  
Kottil W. Rammohan ◽  
June Halper ◽  
Steven Lang ◽  
Sara McCurdy Murphy ◽  
Lisa Patton ◽  
...  

Abstract Although many regional multiple sclerosis (MS) databases existed in the United States and Canada, there was no single clinician-derived registry that examined this disease as a group across the North American continent. This distinction is important because information that results from such a database can potentially give perspectives about MS that cannot be derived from any single regional registry. A partnership was forged between the pharmaceutical industry and the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC) to create a registry of patients with MS from Canada and the United States, including Puerto Rico. Case report forms were created to collect physician-derived information, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was selected to capture patient-reported outcomes. As of November 2021, 754 of 1000 patients have been enrolled. Completion of recruitment is expected by the end of 2021. Twenty-five centers are participating, with an expected total of 30, including five centers from Canada. Clinical status, health economic outcomes, magnetic resonance images, and, soon, biomarkers relevant to understanding relapses and progression are collected. The short-term goal is to understand and better treat MS disease progression, and the long-term goal is its prevention. The North American Registry for Care and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (NARCRMS) is one of few clinician/patient-generated registries that examines MS across North America, including Puerto Rico. Information derived from the natural history studies should help physicians, the pharmaceutical industry, and regulatory bodies understand MS better and improve quality of life for patients with MS worldwide.


2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 194-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Fox ◽  
Amber R. Salter ◽  
Tuula Tyry ◽  
Jennifer Sun ◽  
Xiaojun You ◽  
...  

Injectable first-line disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) are generally prescribed for continuous use. Accordingly, the various factors that influence patient persistence with treatment and that can lead some patients to switch medications or discontinue treatment may affect clinical outcomes. Using data from the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) database, this study evaluated participants' reasons for discontinuation of injectable DMTs as well as the relationship between staying on therapy and sustained patient-reported disease progression and annualized relapse rates. Participants selected their reason(s) for discontinuation from among 16 possible options covering the categories of efficacy, safety, tolerability, and burden, with multiple responses permitted. Both unadjusted data and data adjusted for baseline age, disease duration, disability, and sex were evaluated. Discontinuation profiles varied among DMTs. Participants on intramuscular interferon beta-1a (IM IFNβ-1a) and glatiramer acetate (GA) reported the fewest discontinuations based on safety concerns, although GA was associated with reports of higher burden and lower efficacy than other therapies. Difficulties with tolerability were more often reported as a reason for discontinuing subcutaneous (SC) IFNβ-1a than as a reason for discontinuing IM IFNβ-1a, GA, or SC IFNβ-1b. In the persistent therapy cohort, less patient-reported disability progression was reported with IM IFNβ-1a treatment than with SC IFNβ-1a, IFNβ-1b, or GA. These findings have relevance to clinical decision making and medication compliance in MS patient care.


2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1464-1471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Ann Marrie ◽  
Gary Cutter ◽  
Tuula Tyry

Background: Visual comorbidities are common in multiple sclerosis (MS) but the impact of visual comorbidities on visual disability is unknown. Objective: We assessed the impact of visual and vascular comorbidities on severity of visual disability in MS. Methods: In 2006, we queried participants of the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) about cataracts, glaucoma, uveitis, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, heart disease, diabetes and peripheral vascular disease. We assessed visual disability using the Vision subscale of Performance Scales. Using Cox regression, we investigated whether visual or vascular comorbidities affected the time between MS symptom onset and the development of mild, moderate and severe visual disability. Results: Of 8983 respondents, 1415 (15.9%) reported a visual comorbidity while 4745 (52.8%) reported a vascular comorbidity. The median (interquartile range) visual score was 1 (0–2). In a multivariable Cox model the risk of mild visual disability was higher among participants with vascular (hazard ratio [HR] 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39–1.51) and visual comorbidities (HR 1.47; 95% CI: 1.37–1.59). Vascular and visual comorbidities were similarly associated with increased risks of moderate and severe visual disability. Conclusions: Visual and vascular comorbidities are associated with progression of visual disability in MS. Clinicians hearing reports of worsening visual symptoms in MS patients should consider visual comorbidities as contributing factors. Further study of these issues using objective, systematic neuro-ophthalmologic evaluations is warranted.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Meador ◽  
Amber R. Salter ◽  
John R. Rinker

Background: Tremor affects 25% to 58% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and is associated with poor prognosis and increased disability. MS-related tremor is difficult to treat, and data regarding patient-reported characterization and response to treatment are limited. We describe the symptomatic treatment of tremor in 508 enrollees in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry who self-reported tremor. Methods: From 777 surveys sent to NARCOMS participants who indicated mild or greater tremor using the Tremor and Coordination Scale, we compiled data regarding disability, tremor severity, symptomatic medication use, and reported response to medications. Results: Symptomatic medications reported to reduce tremor were used by 238 respondents (46.9%). Symptomatic medication use was associated with increased rates of unemployment and disability, and many other characteristics were similar between groups. Symptomatic drug use was more likely in participants reporting moderate (53.9%) or severe (51.3%) tremor than in those with mild (36.6%) or totally disabling (35.0%) tremor. This disparity held true across multiple tremor severity scores. The most commonly used drug classes were anticonvulsants (50.8%) and benzodiazepines (46.2%), with gabapentin and clonazepam used most often in their respective classes. Conclusions: Tremor in MS remains poorly treated; less than half of the participants reported benefit from symptomatic medications. Patients with moderate-to-severe tremor are more likely to report tremor benefit than are those with mild or disabling tremor. γ-Aminobutyric acid–active medications were most commonly reported as beneficial.


2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 114-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Ann Marrie ◽  
Myla Goldman

Tremor secondary to multiple sclerosis (MS) can be severely disabling but remains understudied. The development of brief, acceptable patient-reported measures of tremor could facilitate further study. We aimed to assess the criterion and construct validity of the Tremor and Coordination Scale (TACS) used by the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry. Forty-four patients with MS completed the TACS and Performance Scales and underwent a neurologic examination (Expanded Disability Status Scale; EDSS) and evaluation with the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC). We assessed criterion and construct validity with Spearman rank correlations between the TACS and the following measures: EDSS, Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT) of the MSFC, age, body-mass index (BMI), the hand function and mobility domains of the Performance Scales, and the Physical and Mental Composite Scores of the 36-item Short Form Health Status Survey (SF-36). The median (interquartile range; IQR) score on the TACS was 1 (0.5–2.0). The TACS correlated moderately with the cerebellar Functional System Score (FSS) (r = 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24–0.70) and with the NHPT (r = −0.51; 95% CI, −0.70 to −0.29). The TACS correlated with the hand (r = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36–0.76) and mobility (r = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.31–0.73) domains of the Performance Scales. The TACS did not correlate significantly with age (r = −0.11; 95% CI, −0.40 to 0.19) or BMI (r = 0.15; 95% CI, −0.15 to 0.43). These findings support the criterion and construct validity of the TACS. Further evaluation is needed to establish the test-retest reliability of the scale and its responsiveness to change.


Author(s):  
Jeffrey Kaplan ◽  
Tamara Miller ◽  
Matthew Baker ◽  
Bryan Due ◽  
Enxu Zhao

Aim: To determine whether clinicians evaluate American Academy of Neurology (AAN) quality metrics for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse and whether repository corticotropin injection (RCI) improves clinical and patient-reported outcomes associated with these metrics at 2 and 6 months after treatment. Methods: A multicenter, prospective, observational registry evaluating patients receiving RCI for MS relapse (N = 125) categorized data according to AAN quality metrics involving diagnosis, disability, fatigue, cognitive impairment, depression, and quality of life. Results: Clinicians assessed all 11 AAN quality metrics in patients with MS relapse. Disability, fatigue, cognitive impairment, depression, and quality of life outcomes improved with RCI therapy. Conclusion: RCI was associated with improved quality metrics, and AAN guidelines were followed during routine RCI treatment for MS relapse.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 245-252
Author(s):  
Amber Salter ◽  
Robert J. Fox ◽  
Gary Cutter ◽  
Ruth Ann Marrie ◽  
Kate E. Nichol ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: As cannabis products become increasingly accessible across the United States, it is important to understand the contemporary use of cannabis for managing multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms. Methods: We invited participants with MS from the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry (aged 18 years or older) to complete a supplemental survey on cannabis use between March and April 2020. Participants reported cannabis use, treated symptoms, patterns, preferences, methods of use, and the factors limiting use. Findings are reported using descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 6934 participants invited, 3249 responded. Of the respondents, 31% reported having ever used cannabis to treat MS symptoms, with 20% currently using cannabis. The remaining 69% had never used cannabis for MS symptoms, for reasons including not enough data about efficacy (40%) and safety (27%), and concerns about legality (25%) and cost (18%). The most common symptoms current users were attempting to treat were spasticity (80%), pain (69%), and sleep problems (61%). Ever users (vs never users) were more likely to be younger, be non-White, have lower education, reside in the Northeast and West, be unemployed, be younger at symptom onset, be currently smoking, and have higher levels of disability and MS-related symptoms (all P < .001). Conclusions: Despite concerns about insufficient safety and efficacy data, legality, and cost, almost one-third of NARCOMS Registry respondents report having tried nonprescription cannabis products in an attempt to alleviate their symptoms. Given the lack of efficacy and safety data on such products, future research in this area is warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document