scholarly journals An economic analysis of usual care and acupuncture collaborative treatment on chronic low back pain: A Markov model decision analysis

Author(s):  
Namkwen Kim ◽  
Bongmin Yang ◽  
Taejin Lee ◽  
Soonman Kwon
Spine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (19) ◽  
pp. 1383-1385
Author(s):  
Patricia M. Herman ◽  
Ryan K. McBain ◽  
Nicholas Broten ◽  
Ian D. Coulter

Spine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (20) ◽  
pp. 1456-1464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia M. Herman ◽  
Tara A. Lavelle ◽  
Melony E. Sorbero ◽  
Eric L. Hurwitz ◽  
Ian D. Coulter

Pain Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 2588-2597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Lynn Murphy ◽  
Richard Edmund Harris ◽  
Nahid Roonizi Keshavarzi ◽  
Suzanna Maria Zick

Abstract Objective Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is associated with fatigue, pain, poor sleep, and disability. Acupressure is a low-risk treatment option used to manage symptoms in other groups, but its efficacy, particularly on fatigue and sleep, is unknown in CLBP. This study examined preliminary effects of two types of self-administered acupressure (relaxing and stimulating) on fatigue, pain, sleep, and reported disability. Methods A randomized pilot trial was conducted (N = 67) in which participants were randomized into six weeks of relaxing acupressure, stimulating acupressure, or usual care. Fatigue was measured by the Brief Fatigue Inventory, pain was measured by the Brief Pain Inventory, sleep was measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and reported disability was measured by the Roland Morris Scale. Results Baseline characteristics were similar across groups. An intent-to-treat analysis using general linear models showed positive improvement in pain in acupressure groups compared with usual care. Pain was reduced by 35–36% in the acupressure groups. Improvement in fatigue was also found in stimulating acupressure compared with usual care. Adverse events were minimal and related to application of too much pressure. Discussion Although this was a small study, acupressure demonstrated promising preliminary support of efficacy for pain and fatigue reduction in this population.


2011 ◽  
Vol 155 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Cherkin ◽  
Karen J. Sherman ◽  
Janet Kahn ◽  
Robert Wellman ◽  
Andrea J. Cook ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42
Author(s):  
Beate Schüßler ◽  
Angsar Abel ◽  
Milena Holzer ◽  
Ruth Meise ◽  
Sebastian Voigt-Radloff ◽  
...  

Abstract Health problem The prevalence of low back pain ranges from 74 to 85%, almost everybody in Germany suffers from low back pain once in his or her life. The recurrence rate within twelve months is 62%, which often leads to inability to work and reduction in earning capacity. The rate of chronic manifestation of low back pain is 5%. Subsequent loss of mobility and functional disability lowers quality of life and participation in private life and at work. Evidence A recent Cochrane review (Kamper et al., 2014) analysed six (outcome disability) and seven (outcome pain) studies with 722 and 821 participants respectively and showed that multidisciplinary rehabilitation compared to usual care has a small, but clinically relevant effect (pain: SMD -0,21 [CI 95% -0,37; -0,04]; disability: SMD -0,23 [CI 95% -0,4; -0,06]). There is a lack of evidence about the intervention conception, patient-centred outcomes and the cost effectiveness. Implication for research Prior to a randomised controlled trial a feasibility study about individualised multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation compared to usual care considering people with chronic low back pain at employable age in Germany is needed. The applicability of available manuals, patient-centred outcomes and cost effectiveness should be explored.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document