scholarly journals Do malaria vector control measures impact disease-related behaviour and knowledge? Evidence from a large-scale larviciding intervention in Tanzania

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Maheu-Giroux ◽  
Marcia C Castro
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guofa Zhou ◽  
Eugenia Lo ◽  
Andrew K. Githeko ◽  
Yaw A. Afrane ◽  
Guiyun Yan

AbstractThe issues of pyrethroid resistance and outdoor malaria parasite transmission have prompted the WHO to call for the development and adoption of viable alternative vector control methods. Larval source management is one of the core malaria vector interventions recommended by the Ministry of Health in many African countries, but it is rarely implemented due to concerns on its cost-effectiveness. New long-lasting microbial larvicide can be a promising cost-effective supplement to current vector control and elimination methods because microbial larvicide uses killing mechanisms different from pyrethroids and other chemical insecticides. It has been shown to be effective in reducing the overall vector abundance and thus both indoor and outdoor transmission. In our opinion, the long-lasting formulation can potentially reduce the cost of larvicide field application, and should be evaluated for its cost-effectiveness, resistance development, and impact on non-target organisms when integrating with other malaria vector control measures. In this opinion, we highlight that long-lasting microbial larvicide can be a potential cost-effective product that complements current front-line long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) programs for malaria control and elimination. Microbial larviciding targets immature mosquitoes, reduces both indoor and outdoor transmission and is not affected by vector resistance to synthetic insecticides. This control method is a shift from the conventional LLINs and IRS programs that mainly target indoor-biting and resting adult mosquitoes.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. e0224718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxwell G. Machani ◽  
Eric Ochomo ◽  
Fred Amimo ◽  
Jackline Kosgei ◽  
Stephen Munga ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. e66354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Papa Makhtar Drame ◽  
Abdoulaye Diallo ◽  
Anne Poinsignon ◽  
Olayide Boussari ◽  
Stephanie Dos Santos ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Sanou ◽  
Hamidou Maïga ◽  
Etienne M. Bilgo ◽  
P. Simon Sawadogo ◽  
Bazoumana D. Sow ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundThere is a global consensus that new intervention tools are needed to cross the last miles in malaria elimination/eradication. In a recent study in Burkina Faso, the Lehmann Funnel Entry Trap (LFET) have shown excellent promise in mosquito densities reducing even in area of high insecticide resistance up to 80%. It requires no chemicals and is self-operated. However, one of the issues of the LFET is the big size of the funnel occupying lot of space inside houses. Here we compared the performance of three new prototypes of LFET with reduced size that combine screening and killing effect on mosquitoes. MethodsThe study was carried out for three months during the rainy season both in low and high malaria vector density sites, Soumousso and Vallée du Kou respectively. The original LFET was modified and 3 new prototypes were produced locally and tested over 3 months (8 days/month) to evaluate their effectiveness in trapping and killing mosquitoes entering houses through the windows. ResultsIn both sites, an overall of 78,435 culicine mosquitoes collected in both traps and houses and most of them were mainly Anopheles gambiae s.l. n= 76,558 (98%) and other species represented n = 1,877 (2%). Of the culicine caught in the trial, n= 55,256 (72%) were collected in traps. The 3 new LFET prototypes reduced the indoor density of mosquitoes collected in the houses by a range of 36 to 73% and 69 to 70% in low vector density setting, Soumousso and high vector density area, Vallée du Kou respectively. The prototype 1 caught a greater number of mosquitoes than the prototype 2 whereas no difference was observed between other prototypes in VK3. In Soumousso, the prototypes 1 and 2 collected significantly higher number of mosquitoes compared to the prototypes 3 and 4. ConclusionThis study has shown that the new LFET prototypes are promising for malaria vector control and could enter in the malaria vector control toolbox in the coming years. Therefore, a large-scale study with one of the prototypes is needed on the practical ability and community acceptance of the LFET to control malaria vectors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  

Background: Malaria occurs mostly in poor tropical and subtropical areas of the world and still a leading cause of illness and death. This study aimed to explore the community knowledge, attitudes and practices towards malaria vector control methods in Rwanda. Methods: This research was conducted under community-based cross-sectional study. Study was conducted in Ruhango district, located in South province of Rwanda. A number of 385 participants were selected using a two-stage randomized cluster sampling procedure and subjected to a tested structured questionnaire for data collection. The data were coded and entered using Kobo Collect Toolbox, and transferred to SPSS for statistical analysis. Results: More than a half of respondents were females (57.7%), married (69.4%), had attended school (89.4%) and 89.6% were farmers. The overall knowledge score showed that 41.0% had low knowledge about malaria vector control methods. Overall, 33.8% of the respondents had positive attitudes towards MVCM. The overall practice score indicated 24.7% of respondents had good on MVCM. People with high level of knowledge towards malaria vector control methods were less likely to have good practices on malaria vector control methods than people with medium and low level of knowledge towards MVCM (OR=0.04; 95%CI: [0.005-0.30]; p<0.001) and that people with positive attitudes were 1.97 times more likely having good practices than people with neutral and negative attitudes towards malaria vector control methods (OR=1.97; 95%CI: [1.08-3.59]; p<0.001). Conclusion: Malaria vector control campaigns accompanied with education for behavioural change should be considered to ensure householders’ participation and cooperation in the Integrated Vector Management (IVM) programme. Moreover, continuous evaluation and monitoring of IVM as well as conducting more surveys on KAP are recommended to improve malaria control measures and to identify indicators for effective, successful, and sustainable malaria elimination programme.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document