scholarly journals Impact of an acute care surgery service on timeliness of care and surgeon satisfaction at a Canadian academic hospital: a retrospective study

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerollos N Wanis ◽  
Allison M Hunter ◽  
Michael B Harington ◽  
Gary Groot
2009 ◽  
Vol 151 (2) ◽  
pp. 302
Author(s):  
R.C. Britt ◽  
L.J. Weireter ◽  
T.J. Novosel ◽  
S.F. Reed ◽  
J.N. Collins ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (10) ◽  
pp. 1318-1321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Briana Lau ◽  
L. Andrew Difronzo

In October 2009, an acute care surgery (ACS) model was implemented to facilitate urgent surgical consults. This study examines the impact of ACS on the timeliness of care and length of hospitalization for patients with acute cholecystitis. A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute cholecystitis who underwent early cholecystectomy. Patients with choledocholithiasis, pancreatitis, biliary colic, or cholelithiasis without cholecystitis were excluded. There were two study cohorts: ACS (October 2009 to July 2010) and pre-ACS (October 2008 to September 2009). Primary outcome measures were length of stay (LOS) and time from the ED to the operating room (OR). One hundred fifty-two cases were identified: 71 in the ACS group and 81 in the pre-ACS group. Patient demographics were similar. The ACS group had a significantly shorter average time from the ED to the OR (24.6 vs 35.0 hours, P = 0.0276). Overall LOS was reduced by a mean of 14.7 hours in the ACS group (mean 3.23 vs 2.63 days, P = 0.11). There was no significant difference in OR time (2.45 vs 2.38 hours, P = 0.562). There was a significant decrease in after-hours cases in the ACS group (5.6 vs 21%, P = 0.004) and a decrease in complication rates (18.5 vs 7.0%, P = 0.032). In conclusion, the ACS model decreased time from the ED to the OR, decreased after-hours cases, decreased length of hospitalization, and decreased complications for patients with acute cholecystitis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Vergis ◽  
Jennifer Metcalfe ◽  
Shannon E. Stogryn ◽  
Kathleen Clouston ◽  
Krista Hardy

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000587
Author(s):  
Thomas Esposito ◽  
Robert Reed ◽  
Raeanna C Adams ◽  
Samir Fakhry ◽  
Dolores Carey ◽  
...  

This series of reviews has been produced to assist both the experienced surgeon and coder, as well as those just starting practice that may have little formal training in this area. Understanding this complex system will allow the provider to work “smarter, not harder” and garner the maximum compensation for their work. We hope we have been successful in achieving and that goal that this series will provide useful information and be worth the time invested in reading it by bringing tangible benefits to the efficiency of practice and its reimbursement. This third section deals with coding of additional select procedures, modifiers, telemedicine coding, and robotic surgery.


2010 ◽  
Vol 160 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose J. Diaz ◽  
Patrick R. Norris ◽  
Richard S. Miller ◽  
Philip Andres Rodriguez ◽  
William P. Riordan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document