Acute Care Surgery Program: Mentoring Fellows and Patient Outcomes

2010 ◽  
Vol 160 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose J. Diaz ◽  
Patrick R. Norris ◽  
Richard S. Miller ◽  
Philip Andres Rodriguez ◽  
William P. Riordan ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Kalina

A service led by acute care surgeons managing trauma, critically ill surgical, and emergency general surgery patients via an acute care surgery model of patient care improves hospital efficiency and patient outcomes at university-affiliated hospitals and American College of Surgeons–verified trauma centers. Our goal was to determine whether an acute care surgeon led service, entitled the Surgical Trauma and Acute Resuscitative Service (STARS) that implemented an acute care surgery model of patient care, could improve hospital efficiency and patient outcomes at a community hospital. A total of 492 patient charts were reviewed, which included 230 before the implementation of the STARS [pre-STARS (control)] and 262 after the implementation of the STARS [post-STARS (study)]. Demographics included age, gender, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 2 score, and medical comorbidities. Efficiency data included length of stay in emergency department (ED-LOS), length of stay in surgical intensive care unit (SICU-LOS), and length of stay in hospital (H-LOS), and total in hospital charges. Average age was 64.1 + 16.4 years, 255 males (51.83%) and 237 females (48.17%). Average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 2 score was 11.9 + 5.8. No significant differences in demographics were observed. Average decreases in ED-LOS (9.7 + 9.6 hours, pre-STARS versus 6.6 + 4.5 hours, post-STARS), SICU-LOS (5.3 + 9.6 days, pre-STARS versus 3.5 + 4.8 days, post-STARS), H-LOS (12.4 + 12.7 days, pre-STARS versus 11.4 + 11.3 days, post-STARS), and total in hospital charges ($419,602.6 + $519,523.0 pre-STARS to $374,816.7 + $411,935.8 post-STARS) post-STARS. Regression analysis revealed decreased ED-LOS—2.9 hours [ P = 0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI): -7.0, 1.2], SICU-LOS—6.3 days ( P < 0.001; 95% CI: -9.3, -3.2), H-LOS—7.6 days ( P = 0.001; 95% CI: -12.1, -3.1), and 3.4 times greater odds of survival ( P = 0.04; 95% CI: 1.1, 10.7) post-STARS. In conclusion, implementation of the STARS improved hospital efficiency and patient outcomes at a community hospital.


2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Vergis ◽  
Jennifer Metcalfe ◽  
Shannon E. Stogryn ◽  
Kathleen Clouston ◽  
Krista Hardy

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000587
Author(s):  
Thomas Esposito ◽  
Robert Reed ◽  
Raeanna C Adams ◽  
Samir Fakhry ◽  
Dolores Carey ◽  
...  

This series of reviews has been produced to assist both the experienced surgeon and coder, as well as those just starting practice that may have little formal training in this area. Understanding this complex system will allow the provider to work “smarter, not harder” and garner the maximum compensation for their work. We hope we have been successful in achieving and that goal that this series will provide useful information and be worth the time invested in reading it by bringing tangible benefits to the efficiency of practice and its reimbursement. This third section deals with coding of additional select procedures, modifiers, telemedicine coding, and robotic surgery.


Brain Injury ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Shyam Murali ◽  
Farjana Alam ◽  
Jenna Kroeker ◽  
Jennifer Ginsberg ◽  
Erin Oberg ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. S93
Author(s):  
Kirsten Hamilton ◽  
James Milburn ◽  
Andrea Jansen ◽  
Jan Jansen

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 50-55
Author(s):  
Chonlada Krutsri ◽  
Pongsasit Singhatas ◽  
Preeda Sumpritpradit ◽  
Tharin Thampongsa ◽  
Samart Phuwapraisirisan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle Ribeiro-Junior ◽  
Cássia Tiemi Kawase Costa ◽  
Samara de Souza Augusto ◽  
Paola Rezende Néder ◽  
Yasmin Garcia Batista Elia ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
pp. 000313482110697
Author(s):  
Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh ◽  
Adedolapo Ojo ◽  
Murwarid Rahimi ◽  
Anthony Paul Kopatsis ◽  
Katherine Kopatsis ◽  
...  

Background Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, less acute care surgical procedures have been performed and consequently hospitals have experienced significant revenue loss. We aim to investigate these procedures performed before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as their effect on the economy. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent cholecystectomies and appendectomies during March–May 2019 compared to the same time period in 2020 using Chi-square and t-tests. Results There were 345 patients who presented with appendicitis or cholecystitis to Elmhurst Hospital Center during the March–May 2019 and 2020 time period. There were three times as many total operations, or about 75%, in 2019 (261) compared to 2020 (84). There was a decrease in the number of admissions from 2019 to 2020 for both acute cholecystitis (149 vs 43, respectively) and acute appendicitis (112 vs 41, respectively). The largest decrease in the number of admissions in 2020 compared to 2019 was observed in April 2020 (98 vs 9, P < .01) followed by May [69 vs 20, P < .01], and March [94 vs 55, P < .01]. Corresponding to the decrease in operative patterns was a noticeable six-time reduction in revenue for the procedures in 2019 ($187,283) compared to 2020 ($30,415). Conclusion We observed almost a triple reduction in the number of cholecystitis and appendicitis procedures performed during the 2020 pandemic surge as compared to the 2019 pre-pandemic data. Elmhurst hospital also experienced four times the loss of revenue during the same time period.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document