scholarly journals Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam restorations: An update of systematic review evidence

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Mickenautsch ◽  
Veerasamy Yengopal
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Carious Lesions ◽  
Amalgam Restorations ◽  
Ionomer Cement

scholarly journals Biological restorations as a treatment option for primary molars with extensive coronal destruction: report of two cases

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Sanches ◽  
Fabrício Kitazono de Carvalho ◽  
Paulo Nelson-Filho ◽  
Sada Assed ◽  
Francisco Wanderley Garcia de Paula e Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Tooth Surface ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Technical Aspects ◽  
Tooth Structure ◽  
Occlusal Adjustment ◽  
Carious Lesions ◽  
Ionomer Cement

This article reports the cases of two young children aged 4 and 5 years, in whom biological restorations using tooth fragments were placed in primary molars with severely damaged crowns due to extensive carious lesions. After radiographic and clinical evaluation, tooth fragments obtained from extracted teeth in stock were autoclaved, adjusted to the prepared cavity and bonded to the remaining tooth structure with either adhesive system (Case 1) or dual-cure resin-based cement (Case 2) over a calcium hydroxide layer and a glass ionomer cement base. Occlusal adjustment was performed and topical sodium fluoride was applied to tooth surface. Periodical clinical and radiographic controls were carried out and the restored teeth were followed up for 4 and 3 years, respectively, until exfoliation. In these two reports, the technical aspects are described and the benefits and disadvantages of biological restorations as an alternative treatment for rehabilitation of severely destroyed primary molars are discussed.

scholarly journals In vitro evaluation of the marginal microleakage of amalgam restorations associated with dentin adhesive, glass ionomer cement and cavity varnish by means of different evaluation methods

2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-14
Author(s):  
Adriano Tomio Hoshi ◽  
Salete Moura Bonifácio da Silva ◽  
Aymar Pavarini
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Evaluation Methods ◽  
Single Line ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Amalgam Restorations ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Dentin Adhesive

This in vitro study evaluated the marginal microleakage of amalgam restorations associated with the cavity varnish Copalite - Cooley & Cooley (GI-CP), dentin adhesive OptiBond Solo - Kerr (GII-OS) and the glass ionomer cement Vitremer - 3M (GIII-VT). Forty-five premolars were employed, which were submitted to independent class II preparations at the mesial and distal aspects comprising the marginal ridges and were restored with Dispersalloy - Dentsply. Afterwards, the teeth were thermocycled and stored in 0.5% basic fuchsine for 24 hours. The evaluations were conducted on a light microscope with 150x magnification and on the Sigma Scan software with employment of a single line and segmented lines. Data analysis allowed to establish that none of the materials was able to eliminate the marginal microleakage, having the GI - CP presented greater and statistically significant values in relation to the other groups in all evaluation methods (p<0.05). The lowest values were displayed by the GIII-VT, yet with no statistically significant difference when compared to GII-OS, except for the evaluation at the Sigma Scan in single line. The three evaluation methods showed a strong positive relationship to each other.

Two-Year Clinical Evaluation of Three Restorative Materials in Primary Molars

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maha Daou ◽  
Bruno Tavernier ◽  
Jean-Marc Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
High Caries Risk ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Amalgam Restorations ◽  
Ionomer Cement

A variety of alternatives to amalgam are now available for use in Class I and Class II restorations in primary teeth, including glass ionomer cements, compomers and resin modified glass ionomer cements(RMGIC). Objectives: This study evaluated the two-year clinical performance of three restorative dental materials: A resin modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji IILC), a compomer (Dyract AP) and a high viscosity glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX), in primary molars of pediatric patients with high caries risk activity and compared these results to those reported for amalgam restorations. Study design: One hundred and forty nine Class I and Class II cavities in 45 patients aged 6 to 8 years were restored with compomer, glass ionomer cements and amalgam. Restorations were evaluated according to modified Ryge criteria by two examiners at baseline, and after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of oral function. The data was submitted to statistical analysis (binomial and hyper geometric tests, p&lt;0.05). Results: Two-year recall rate was 62.42%. Class I performed better than class II restorations. The difference in marginal discoloration between compomer and amalgam restorations was statistically significant (p=0.014). No other significant differences were found between GIC, compomer and amalgam restorations. The clinical performance of the three restorative materials compared to amalgam in Class I and Class II cavities at two-year recall was acceptable.Conclusions: The results, even in a population with high caries risk activity, suggest that these materials are suitable alternatives to amalgam in Class I and Class II restorations in primary teeth.

Caries lesion prevention and arrestment in approximal surfaces in contact with glass ionomer cement restorations - A systematic review and meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara Kerber Tedesco ◽  
Clarissa Calil Bonifácio ◽  
Ana Flávia Bissoto Calvo ◽  
Thais Gimenez ◽  
Mariana Minatel Braga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Caries Lesion ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Approximal Surfaces

scholarly journals In vitro evaluation of marginal microleakage of class II bonded amalgam restorations using a dentin adhesive and a glass ionomer cement

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edmêr Silvestre PEREIRA JÚNIOR ◽  
Maria Francisca Thereza Borro BIJELLA ◽  
Salete Moura Bonifácio da SILVA ◽  
Bernardo Gonzales VONO
Keyword(s):  
Tap Water ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Bonding System ◽  
Amalgam Restorations ◽  
Ionomer Cement

The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vitro the effectiveness of the dentin bonding system All Bond 2 associated with Resinomer (Bisco), and of Vitrebond (3M) glass ionomer cement fresh-mixed, both used in the bonded amalgam technique, to prevent short-term microleakage in class II cavities restored with Dispersalloy (Dentsply), an admixed alloy. The control group utilized the Copalite (Cooley & Cooley) varnish. Forty five sound human extracted premolars were used. Class II cavity preparations were made on the mesial and distal surfaces of non-carious teeth, with the gingival margins wall established 1mm under the cementum enamel junction. The specimens were divided randomly into three groups with thirty cavities in each group. The teeth were stored in distilled water for 24 hours and were thermocyled through 500 cycles in distilled water between 5°C and 55°C with a dwell time of 15 seconds. The apices and roots of the teeth were sealed. They were placed in a 37°C bath of 0.5% basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours. The teeth were washed in tap water for 24 hours and cut. The microleakage scores per restoration were averaged and three values of various test groups were subjected to the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test at a significance level of p < 0.05. The All Bond 2/Resinomer showed significantly less microleakage at gingival margins than the Vitrebond and Copalite lined to amalgam restorations. The Vitrebond fresh mixed, lined to amalgam restorations, showed significantly less microleakage than the Copalite lined to amalgam restorations.

scholarly journals Reduction of dental fear and anxiety: the outlook of atraumatic restorative treatment

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 730
Author(s):  
Patricia Aleixo dos Santos Domingos ◽  
Livia Maria Prado Fonseca ◽  
Ana Luisa Botta Martins de Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Restorative Treatment ◽  
Carious Lesions ◽  
Patient Cooperation ◽  
Carious Process ◽  
Fear And Anxiety ◽  
Ionomer Cement

AIM: This study aimed to report a case in which the technique used was the atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in patients with fear of conventional treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This procedure consisted in the treatment of carious lesions in the patient associated with the program of educational and preventive measures which the patient has undergone. The technique described here was performed on tooth 85, which presented atypical carious lesion cavity, through the removal of softened carious tissue with the use of hand instruments, without anesthesia and use of direct restorative material with fluoride release (glass ionomer cement). RESULTS: As a result of this technique, there was greater patient cooperation and decrease of anxiety initially revealed. CONCLUSION: Thus, it might be concluded that the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment is a technique already established that showed clinical effectiveness in controlling the evolution of the carious process and that being well indicated, was able to induce more cooperation from the patient, leading to the success of therapy restorer. The conventional glass ionomer cement showed excessive surface wear and therefore should not be used to restore atypical cavities.

scholarly journals Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci ◽  
Evandro Piva ◽  
Fernando Potrich ◽  
Elenita Formolo ◽  
Flávio Fernando Demarco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Blue Dye ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Amalgam Restorations ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Adhesive Materials

The aim of this study was to verify the ability of different adhesive materials to prevent microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations. Standard cavities were prepared in both buccal and lingual surfaces of 35 bovine incisors. The gingival wall was located in cementum/dentin and the occlusal wall in enamel. Teeth (n=35) were divided into 5 groups, according to material employed (one glass-ionomer cement, two resin cements, one adhesive system, and Copalex varnish as a control). Following restoration, the teeth were submitted to thermal cycling. The teeth were subsequently immersed in methylene blue dye and sectioned to allow assessment of microleakage. Non-parametric statistical analysis indicated that all materials demonstrated less leakage than the control group (p<0.01). No leakage was found using the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement, which was significantly different from the other adhesive materials (p<0.05). Leakage in enamel was lower than in cementum/dentin margins. It was concluded that bonded amalgam was an effective technique, since all materials prevented microleakage in enamel and cementum/dentin, when compared to the control group, except Panavia in cementum/dentin margins.

Clinical and Radiographic Study of Chemical-Mechanical Removal of Caries Using Papacárie: 24-Month Follow Up

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
SK Bussadori ◽  
CC Guedes ◽  
JC Bachiega ◽  
TO Santis ◽  
LJ Motta
Keyword(s):  
Rio De Janeiro ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Radiographic Study ◽  
Mechanical Removal ◽  
Carious Lesions ◽  
Affected Tissue ◽  
Permanent Molars ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Background: The chemical-mechanical removal of caries involves the chemical softening of the infected dentin, following by the mechanical removal of the softened tissue using non-cutting manual instruments. Papacárie® (Fórmula&Ação, Sao Paulo, Brazil) is a product in gel form used for the chemical-mechanical softening of the affected tissue. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Papacárie®. Methods: Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed on 14 young permanent molars treated with Papacárie® and restored with glass ionomer cement (VitroMolar, DFL Ind. Com LTDA,Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) 24 months following intervention. Results: Success was achieved in 13 of the 14 cases. Conclusion: Papacárie® was effective in the treatment of carious lesions and constitutes a conservative alternative that offers benefits to patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document