Randomised trial of neo-adjuvant therapy in patients with stage IIIA non small cell lung cancer

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Andrews
1996 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 709
Author(s):  
Se Haeng Cho ◽  
Kyung Young Chung ◽  
Joo Hang Kim ◽  
Byung Soo Kim ◽  
Joon Chang ◽  
...  

Haigan ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-17
Author(s):  
Takaaki Konishi ◽  
Teruo Matsui ◽  
Yoshito Matsubara ◽  
Satoru Sawai ◽  
Hisao Ishida ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 2602-2613
Author(s):  
Sumin Shin ◽  
Hong Kwan Kim ◽  
Jong Ho Cho ◽  
Yong Soo Choi ◽  
Kwhanmien Kim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 686-693
Author(s):  
Miaomiao Wen ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Xuejiao Wang ◽  
Sanhu Yang ◽  
Ying Sun ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Some non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are unexpectedly diagnosed with stage IIIA-N2 disease at the time of thoracoscopy or thoracotomy. Because of the limited statistical evidence of induction chemotherapy for these patients, it is necessary to develop more profound treatment strategies. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations after radical resection were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on treatment: EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs, erlotinib or gefitinib), adjuvant chemotherapy (docetaxel plus cisplatin), and combination treatment (chemotherapy plus EGFR-TKIs). The effect of adjuvant therapy on survival rate was assessed using univariate and Cox regression analyses. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patients receiving EGFR-TKIs alone showed significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS; <i>p</i> = 0.025) when compared to those receiving chemotherapy alone. Compared to chemotherapy alone, the combination of chemotherapy and EGFR-TKIs resulted did not significantly improve DFS (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and overall survival (OS <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). The combination of EGFR-TKIs with chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy led to improvements in both DFS (<i>p</i> = 0.116) and OS (<i>p</i> = 0.039) compared to patients receiving a EGFR-TKI monotherapy. Toxicities were mild in the 3 treatment groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our study demonstrated that adjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment significantly increased the DFS of patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC when compared with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The use of EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy is recommended in the setting of combined-modality therapy.


The Lancet ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 386 (9998) ◽  
pp. 1049-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miklos Pless ◽  
Roger Stupp ◽  
Hans-Beat Ris ◽  
Rolf A Stahel ◽  
Walter Weder ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (25) ◽  
pp. 2235-2245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Zhao Zhong ◽  
Ke-Neng Chen ◽  
Chun Chen ◽  
Chun-Dong Gu ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To assess the benefits of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors as neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapies in locally advanced EGFR mutation-positive non–small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a multicenter (17 centers in China), open-label, phase II, randomized controlled trial of erlotinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC chemotherapy) as neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy in patients with stage IIIA-N2 non–small-cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations in exon 19 or 21 (EMERGING). Patients received erlotinib 150 mg/d (neoadjuvant therapy, 42 days; adjuvant therapy, up to 12 months) or gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (neoadjuvant therapy, two cycles; adjuvant therapy, up to two cycles). Assessments were performed at 6 weeks and every 3 months postsurgery. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1; secondary end points were pathologic complete response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, safety, and tolerability. RESULTS Of 386 patients screened, 72 were randomly assigned to treatment (intention-to-treat population), and 71 were included in the safety analysis (one patient withdrew before treatment). The ORR for neoadjuvant erlotinib versus GC chemotherapy was 54.1% versus 34.3% (odds ratio, 2.26; 95% CI, 0.87 to 5.84; P = .092). No pathologic complete response was identified in either arm. Three (9.7%) of 31 patients and zero of 23 patients in the erlotinib and GC chemotherapy arms, respectively, had a major pathologic response. Median PFS was significantly longer with erlotinib (21.5 months) versus GC chemotherapy (11.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.67; P < .001). Observed adverse events reflected those most commonly seen with the two treatments. CONCLUSION The primary end point of ORR with 42 days of neoadjuvant erlotinib was not met, but the secondary end point PFS was significantly improved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document