scholarly journals Air pollution and children’s health—a review of adverse effects associated with prenatal exposure from fine to ultrafine particulate matter

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie M. Johnson ◽  
Aline Rodrigues Hoffmann ◽  
Jonathan C. Behlen ◽  
Carmen Lau ◽  
Drew Pendleton ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Particulate matter (PM), a major component of ambient air pollution, accounts for a substantial burden of diseases and fatality worldwide. Maternal exposure to PM during pregnancy is particularly harmful to children’s health since this is a phase of rapid human growth and development. Method In this review, we synthesize the scientific evidence on adverse health outcomes in children following prenatal exposure to the smallest toxic components, fine (PM2.5) and ultrafine (PM0.1) PM. We highlight the established and emerging findings from epidemiologic studies and experimental models. Results Maternal exposure to fine and ultrafine PM directly and indirectly yields numerous adverse birth outcomes and impacts on children’s respiratory systems, immune status, brain development, and cardiometabolic health. The biological mechanisms underlying adverse effects include direct placental translocation of ultrafine particles, placental and systemic maternal oxidative stress and inflammation elicited by both fine and ultrafine PM, epigenetic changes, and potential endocrine effects that influence long-term health. Conclusion Policies to reduce maternal exposure and health consequences in children should be a high priority. PM2.5 levels are regulated, yet it is recognized that minority and low socioeconomic status groups experience disproportionate exposures. Moreover, PM0.1 levels are not routinely measured or currently regulated. Consequently, preventive strategies that inform neighborhood/regional planning and clinical/nutritional recommendations are needed to mitigate maternal exposure and ultimately protect children’s health.

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 1029-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Berhane ◽  
Y. Zhang ◽  
W. S. Linn ◽  
E. B. Rappaport ◽  
T. M. Bastain ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lizan D. Bloemsma ◽  
Dana Dabelea ◽  
Deborah S. K. Thomas ◽  
Jennifer L. Peel ◽  
John L. Adgate ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (suppl_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Klepac ◽  
I Locatelli ◽  
S Korošec ◽  
N Künzli ◽  
A Kukec

2020 ◽  
Vol 182 ◽  
pp. 109130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne P. Starling ◽  
Brianna F. Moore ◽  
Deborah S.K. Thomas ◽  
Jennifer L. Peel ◽  
Weiming Zhang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Saleh ◽  
W. Shepherd ◽  
C. Jewell ◽  
N. L. Lam ◽  
J. Balmes ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Indoor and ambient air pollution exposure is a major risk to respiratory health worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Interventional trials have mainly focused on alternatives to cooking stoves, with mixed results. Beyond cooking, additional sources of particulate matter also contribute to the burden of air pollution exposure. This review explores evidence from current randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the clinical effectiveness of interventions to reduce particulate matter in LMICs.METHODS: Twelve databases and the grey literature (e.g., Government reports and policy papers) were searched. Eligible studies were RCTs conducted in LMICs aiming to reduce particulate exposure from any source and reporting on at least one clinical respiratory outcome (respiratory symptoms, lung function or clinical diagnoses). Data from relevant studies were systematically extracted, the risk of bias assessed and narrative synthesis provided.RESULTS: Of the 14 included studies, 12 tested ‘improved' cookstoves, most using biomass, but solar and bioethanol cookers were also included. One trial used solar lamps and another was an integrated intervention incorporating behavioural and environmental components for the treatment and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Of the six studies reporting child pneumonia outcomes, none demonstrated significant benefit in intention-to-treat analysis. Ten studies reported respiratory symptom outcomes with some improvements seen, but self-reporting made these outcomes highly vulnerable to bias. Substantial inter-study clinical and methodological heterogeneity precluded calculation of pooled effect estimates.CONCLUSION: Evidence from the RCTs performed to date suggests that individual household-level interventions for air pollution exposure reduction have limited benefits for respiratory health. More comprehensive approaches to air pollution exposure reduction must be developed so their potential health benefits can be assessed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document