scholarly journals Upweighting rare favourable alleles increases long-term genetic gain in genomic selection programs

2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huiming Liu ◽  
Theo Meuwissen ◽  
Anders C Sørensen ◽  
Peer Berg
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Genetic Gain

scholarly journals Improving short and long term genetic gain by accounting for within family variance in optimal cross selection

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Allier ◽  
Christina Lehermeier ◽  
Alain Charcosset ◽  
Laurence Moreau ◽  
Simon Teyssèdre
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Diversity ◽  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Genetic Gain ◽  
Family Selection ◽  
Breeding Programs ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Inbreeding Rate ◽  
Genetic Value ◽  
Optimal Set

AbstractThe implementation of genomic selection in recurrent breeding programs raised several concerns, especially that a higher inbreeding rate could compromise the long term genetic gain. An optimized mating strategy that maximizes the performance in progeny and maintains diversity for long term genetic gain on current and yet unknown future targets is essential. The optimal cross selection approach aims at identifying the optimal set of crosses maximizing the expected genetic value in the progeny under a constraint on diversity in the progeny. Usually, optimal cross selection does not account for within family selection, i.e. the fact that only a selected fraction of each family serves as candidate parents of the next generation. In this study, we consider within family variance accounting for linkage disequilibrium between quantitative trait loci to predict the expected mean performance and the expected genetic diversity in the selected progeny of a set of crosses. These predictions rely on the method called usefulness criterion parental contribution (UCPC). We compared UCPC based optimal cross selection and optimal cross selection in a long term simulated recurrent genomic selection breeding program considering overlapping generations. UCPC based optimal cross selection proved to be more efficient to convert the genetic diversity into short and long term genetic gains than optimal cross selection. We also showed that using the UCPC based optimal cross selection, the long term genetic gain can be increased with only limited reduction of the short term commercial genetic gain.

scholarly journals Uses of genomics in livestock agriculture

2012 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 73 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Goddard
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Genetic Gain ◽  
Additive Genetic Variance ◽  
Reference Population ◽  
Biological Information ◽  
Breeding Value ◽  
Biological Efficiency ◽  
Minimum Age ◽  
Livestock Products

World demand for livestock products is likely to increase in coming decades but the cost of production could escalate faster than the price due to competition for land, water, grain and fertiliser and the effects of climate change and its mitigation. To remain competitive for these resources, livestock agriculture has to dramatically increase in efficiency of production. Genetic gain is one mechanism to achieve increased efficiency and there is the opportunity to utilise the scientific advances in genomics. Three ways in which genomics can be used are in additive genetic improvement, exploitation of non-additive genetic variance and management which exploits genotype by environment interactions to optimise management. Genomic selection is already being widely implemented in dairy cattle and beef cattle and sheep will follow in the future once the accuracy of genomic selection is high enough. The accuracy of equations that predict breeding value from DNA genotypes can be increased by increasing the size of the reference population from which the equations are estimated, increasing the density of markers, using genome sequences instead of markers, using more appropriate statistical procedures and incorporating biological information into the prediction. In the long term, genomic selection combined with reproductive technology that reduces the minimum age at breeding will greatly increase the rate of genetic gain. This will allow long-term increases in biological efficiency and short-term tailoring of livestock to meet the demands of particular markets and opportunities.

scholarly journals A Two-Part Strategy using Genomic Selection in Hybrid Crop Breeding Programs

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen Powell ◽  
R. Chris Gaynor ◽  
Gregor Gorjanc ◽  
Christian R. Werner ◽  
John M. Hickey
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Genetic Gain ◽  
Genetic Variance ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Stochastic Simulations ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Crop Breeding ◽  
Breeding Programs ◽  
Multiple Generations

AbstractHybrid crop breeding programs using a two-part strategy produced the most genetic gain, but a maximum avoidance of inbreeding crossing scheme was required to increase long-term genetic gain. The two-part strategy uses outbred parents to complete multiple generations per year to reduce the generation interval of hybrid crop breeding programs. The maximum avoidance of inbreeding crossing scheme manages genetic variance by maintaining uniform contributions and inbreeding coefficients across all crosses. This study performed stochastic simulations to quantify the potential of a two-part strategy in combination with two crossing schemes to increase the rate of genetic gain in hybrid crop breeding programs. The two crossing schemes were: (i) a circular crossing scheme, and (ii) a maximum avoidance of inbreeding crossing scheme. The results from this study show that the implementation of genomic selection increased the rate of genetic gain, and that the two-part hybrid crop breeding program generated the highest genetic gain. This study also shows that the maximum avoidance of inbreeding crossing scheme increased long-term genetic gain in two-part hybrid crop breeding programs completing multiple selection cycles per year, as a result of maintaining higher levels of genetic variance over time. The flexibility of the two-part strategy offers further opportunities to integrate new technologies to further increase genetic gain in hybrid crop breeding programs, such as the use of outbred training populations. However, the practical implementation of the two-part strategy will require the development of bespoke transition strategies to fundamentally change the data, logistics, and infrastructure that underpin hybrid crop breeding programs.Key messageHybrid crop breeding programs using a two-part strategy produced the most genetic gain by using outbred parents to complete multiple generations per year. However, a maximum avoidance of inbreeding crossing scheme was required to manage genetic variance and increase long-term genetic gain.

scholarly journals Genomic Selection: Current Status, Opportunities and Challenges

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj Budhlakoti ◽  
Dwijesh Chandra Mishra ◽  
Anil Rai ◽  
K.K. Chaturvedi ◽  
Anu Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plant Breeding ◽  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Genetic Gain ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Breeding Value ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Breeding Research ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Genetic Interval

Now a days, Genomic Selection (GS) became a preferable choice for selection of appropriate candidate for animal and plant breeding research. Various studies related to GS has been done recently where it has shown potential benefits and advantages over traditional and conventional plant breeding methods. GS has been successfully implemented in various animal and plant breeding programs. It reduces the total costs by selecting the animals at early stage hence shorten the generation interval. Genomic selection is the future of livestock and plant breeding as it improves the genetic gain by decreasing genetic interval and improving reliability. Although there is a need of further investigation to improve the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding value and manage long-term genetic gain. This article provides a brief review what we have achieved through GS till yet and what is future scope and perspective in the GS research.

scholarly journals A hybrid optimal contribution approach to drive short-term gains while maintaining long-term sustainability in a modern plant breeding program

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Santantonio ◽  
Kelly Robbins
Keyword(s):  
Plant Breeding ◽  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Genetic Gain ◽  
Genetic Variance ◽  
Hybrid Approach ◽  
Breeding Program ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Breeding Programs ◽  
Plant Breeding Program

1AbstractPlant breeding programs must adapt genomic selection to an already complex system. Inbred or hybrid plant breeding programs must make crosses, produce inbred individuals, and phenotype inbred lines or their hybrid test-crosses to select and validate superior material for product release. These products are few, and while it is clear that population improvement is necessary for continued genetic gain, it may not be sufficient to generate superior products. Rapid-cycle recurrent truncation genomic selection has been proposed to increase genetic gain by reducing generation time. This strategy has been shown to increase short-term gains, but can quickly lead to loss of genetic variance through inbreeding as relationships drive prediction. The optimal contribution of each individual can be determined to maximize gain in the following generation while limiting inbreeding. While optimal contribution strategies can maintain genetic variance in later generations, they suffer from a lack of short-term gains in doing so. We present a hybrid approach that branches out yearly to push the genetic value of potential varietal materials while maintaining genetic variance in the recurrent population, such that a breeding program can achieve short-term success without exhausting long-term potential. Because branching increases the genetic distance between the phenotyping pipeline and the recurrent population, this method requires sacrificing some trial plots to phenotype materials directly out of the recurrent population. We envision the phenotypic pipeline not only for selection and validation, but as an information generator to build predictive models and develop new products.

scholarly journals Accuracy of genomic selection and long‐term genetic gain for resistance to Verticillium wilt in strawberry

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique D. A. Pincot ◽  
Michael A. Hardigan ◽  
Glenn S. Cole ◽  
Randi A. Famula ◽  
Peter M. Henry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Verticillium Wilt ◽  
Genetic Gain

scholarly journals Optimal cross selection for long-term genetic gain in two-part programs with rapid recurrent genomic selection

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregor Gorjanc ◽  
R. Chris Gaynor ◽  
John M. Hickey
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Diversity ◽  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Genetic Gain ◽  
Balancing Selection ◽  
Breeding Program ◽  
Truncation Selection ◽  
Part Program ◽  
Population Improvement ◽  
Selection For

AbstractThis study evaluates optimal cross selection for balancing selection and maintenance of genetic diversity in two-part plant breeding programs with rapid recurrent genomic selection. The two-part program reorganizes a conventional breeding program into population improvement component with recurrent genomic selection to increase the mean of germplasm and product development component with standard methods to develop new lines. Rapid recurrent genomic selection has a large potential, but is challenging due to genotyping costs or genetic drift. Here we simulate a wheat breeding program for 20 years and compare optimal cross selection against truncation selection in the population improvement with one to six cycles per year. With truncation selection we crossed a small or a large number of parents. With optimal cross selection we jointly optimised selection, maintenance of genetic diversity, and cross allocation with AlphaMate program. The results show that the two-part program with optimal cross selection delivered the largest genetic gain that increased with the increasing number of cycles. With four cycles per year optimal cross selection had 78% (15%) higher long-term genetic gain than truncation selection with a small (large) number of parents. Higher genetic gain was achieved through higher efficiency of converting genetic diversity into genetic gain; optimal cross selection quadrupled (doubled) efficiency of truncation selection with a small (large) number of parents. Optimal cross selection also reduced the drop of genomic selection accuracy due to the drift between training and prediction populations. In conclusion, optimal cross-selection enables optimal management and exploitation of population improvement germplasm in two-part programs.Key messageOptimal cross selection increases long-term genetic gain of two-part programs with rapid recurrent genomic selection. It achieves this by optimising efficiency of converting genetic diversity into genetic gain through reducing the loss of genetic diversity and reducing the drop of genomic prediction accuracy with rapid cycling.

scholarly journals The look ahead trace back optimizer for genomic selection under transparent and opaque simulators

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Amini ◽  
Felipe Restrepo Franco ◽  
Guiping Hu ◽  
Lizhi Wang
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Genetic Gain ◽  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
In Planta ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Look Ahead ◽  
Trace Back ◽  
New Variant ◽  
The Look ◽  
Partially Observable

AbstractRecent advances in genomic selection (GS) have demonstrated the importance of not only the accuracy of genomic prediction but also the intelligence of selection strategies. The look ahead selection algorithm, for example, has been found to significantly outperform the widely used truncation selection approach in terms of genetic gain, thanks to its strategy of selecting breeding parents that may not necessarily be elite themselves but have the best chance of producing elite progeny in the future. This paper presents the look ahead trace back algorithm as a new variant of the look ahead approach, which introduces several improvements to further accelerate genetic gain especially under imperfect genomic prediction. Perhaps an even more significant contribution of this paper is the design of opaque simulators for evaluating the performance of GS algorithms. These simulators are partially observable, explicitly capture both additive and non-additive genetic effects, and simulate uncertain recombination events more realistically. In contrast, most existing GS simulation settings are transparent, either explicitly or implicitly allowing the GS algorithm to exploit certain critical information that may not be possible in actual breeding programs. Comprehensive computational experiments were carried out using a maize data set to compare a variety of GS algorithms under four simulators with different levels of opacity. These results reveal how differently a same GS algorithm would interact with different simulators, suggesting the need for continued research in the design of more realistic simulators. As long as GS algorithms continue to be trained in silico rather than in planta, the best way to avoid disappointing discrepancy between their simulated and actual performances may be to make the simulator as akin to the complex and opaque nature as possible.

scholarly journals Expected Genetic Contributions and Their Impact on Gene Flow and Genetic Gain

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 153 (2) ◽  
pp. 1009-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Woolliams ◽  
P Bijma ◽  
B Villanueva
Keyword(s):  
Gene Flow ◽  
Genetic Gain ◽  
Overlapping Generations ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Index Theory ◽  
Previous Theory ◽  
Selection Indices ◽  
Breeding Groups ◽  
Genetic Contributions

Abstract Long-term genetic contributions (ri) measure lasting gene flow from an individual i. By accounting for linkage disequilibrium generated by selection both within and between breeding groups (categories), assuming the infinitesimal model, a general formula was derived for the expected contribution of ancestor i in category q (μi(q)), given its selective advantages (si(q)). Results were applied to overlapping generations and to a variety of modes of inheritance and selection indices. Genetic gain was related to the covariance between ri and the Mendelian sampling deviation (ai), thereby linking gain to pedigree development. When si(q) includes ai, gain was related to E[μi(q)ai], decomposing it into components attributable to within and between families, within each category, for each element of si(q). The formula for μi(q) was consistent with previous index theory for predicting gain in discrete generations. For overlapping generations, accurate predictions of gene flow were obtained among and within categories in contrast to previous theory that gave qualitative errors among categories and no predictions within. The generation interval was defined as the period for which μi(q), summed over all ancestors born in that period, equaled 1. Predictive accuracy was supported by simulation results for gain and contributions with sib-indices, BLUP selection, and selection with imprinted variation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document