scholarly journals A qualitative inquiry of access to and quality of primary healthcare in seven communities in East and West Africa (SevenCEWA): perspectives of stakeholders, healthcare providers and users

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Soter Ameh ◽  
Bolarinwa Oladimeji Akeem ◽  
Caleb Ochimana ◽  
Abayomi Olabayo Oluwasanu ◽  
Shukri F. Mohamed ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Universal health coverage is one of the Sustainable Development Goal targets known to improve population health and reduce financial burden. There is little qualitative data on access to and quality of primary healthcare in East and West Africa. The aim of this study was to describe the viewpoints of healthcare users, healthcare providers and other stakeholders on health-seeking behaviour, access to and quality of healthcare in seven communities in East and West Africa. Methods A qualitative study was conducted in four communities in Nigeria and one community each in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania in 2018. Purposive sampling was used to recruit: 155 respondents (mostly healthcare users) for 24 focus group discussions, 25 healthcare users, healthcare providers and stakeholders for in-depth interviews and 11 healthcare providers and stakeholders for key informant interviews. The conceptual framework in this study combined elements of the Health Belief Model, Health Care Utilisation Model, four ‘As’ of access to care, and pathway model to better understand the a priori themes on access to and quality of primary healthcare as well as health-seeking behaviours of the study respondents. A content analysis of the data was done using MAXQDA 2018 qualitative software to identify these a priori themes and emerging themes. Results Access to primary healthcare in the seven communities was limited, especially use of health insurance. Quality of care was perceived to be unacceptable in public facilities whereas cost of care was unaffordable in private facilities. Health providers and users as well as stakeholders highlighted shortage of equipment, frequent drug stock-outs and long waiting times as major issues, but had varying opinions on satisfaction with care. Use of herbal medicines and other traditional treatments delayed or deterred seeking modern healthcare in the Nigerian sites. Conclusions There was a substantial gap in primary healthcare coverage and quality in the selected communities in rural and urban East and West Africa. Alternative models of healthcare delivery that address social and health inequities, through affordable health insurance, can be used to fill this gap and facilitate achieving universal health coverage.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soter Ameh ◽  
Bolarinwa Oladimeji Akeem ◽  
Caleb Ochimana ◽  
Abayomi Olabayo Oluwasanu ◽  
Shukri F Mohamed ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Universal health coverage is one of the Sustainable Development Goal targets known to improve population health and reduce financial burden. There is little qualitative data on access to and quality of primary healthcare in East and West Africa. The aim of this study was to describe the viewpoints of healthcare users, healthcare providers and other stakeholders on health-seeking behaviour, access to and quality of healthcare in seven communities in East and West Africa.Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in four communities in Nigeria and one community each in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania in 2018. Purposive sampling was used to recruit: 155 respondents (mostly healthcare users) for 24 focus group discussions, 25 healthcare users, healthcare providers and stakeholders for in-depth interviews and 11 healthcare providers and stakeholders for key informant interviews. The conceptual framework in this study combined elements of the Health Belief Model, Health Care Utilisation Model, four ‘As’ of access to care, and pathway model to better understand the a priori themes on access to and quality of primary healthcare as well as health-seeking behaviours of the study respondents. A content analysis of the data was done using MAXQDA 2018 qualitative software to identify these a priori themes and emerging themes.Results: Access to primary healthcare in the seven communities was limited, especially use of health insurance. Quality of care was perceived to be unacceptable in public facilities whereas cost of care was unaffordable in private facilities. Health providers and users as well as stakeholders highlighted shortage of equipment, frequent drug stock-outs and long waiting times as major issues, but had varying opinions on satisfaction with care. Use of herbal medicines and other traditional treatments delayed or deterred seeking modern healthcare in the Nigerian sites. Conclusions: There was a substantial gap in primary healthcare coverage and quality in the selected communities in rural and urban East and West Africa. Alternative models of healthcare delivery that address social and health inequities, through affordable health insurance, can be used to fill this gap and facilitate achieving universal health coverage.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soter Ameh ◽  
Bolarinwa Oladimeji Akeem ◽  
Caleb Ochimana ◽  
Abayomi Olabayo Oluwasanu ◽  
Shukri F Mohamed ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Universal health coverage is one of the Sustainable Development Goal targets known to improve population health and reduce financial burden. There is little qualitative data on access to and quality of primary healthcare in East and West Africa. The aim of this study was to describe the viewpoints of healthcare users, healthcare providers and other stakeholders on health-seeking behaviour, access to and quality of healthcare in seven communities in East and West Africa.Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in four communities in Nigeria and one community each in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania in 2018. Purposive sampling was used to recruit: 155 respondents (mostly healthcare users) for 24 focus group discussions, 25 healthcare users, healthcare providers and stakeholders for in-depth interviews and 11 healthcare providers and stakeholders for key informant interviews. The conceptual framework in this study combined elements of the Health Belief Model, Health Care Utilisation Model, four ‘As’ of access to care, and pathway model to better understand the a priori themes on access to and quality of primary healthcare as well as health-seeking behaviours of the study respondents. A content analysis of the data was done using MAXQDA 2018 qualitative software to identify these a priori themes and emerging themes.Results: Access to primary healthcare in the seven communities was limited, especially use of health insurance. Quality of care was perceived to be unacceptable in public facilities whereas cost of care was unaffordable in private facilities. Health providers and users as well as stakeholders highlighted shortage of equipment, frequent drug stock-outs and long waiting times as major issues, but had varying opinions on satisfaction with care. Use of herbal medicines and other traditional treatments delayed or deterred seeking modern healthcare in the Nigerian sites. Conclusions: There was a substantial gap in primary healthcare coverage and quality in the selected communities in rural and urban East and West Africa. Alternative models of healthcare delivery that address social and health inequities, through affordable health insurance, can be used to fill this gap and facilitate achieving universal health coverage.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soter Ameh ◽  
Bolarinwa Oladimeji Akeem ◽  
Caleb Ochimana ◽  
Abayomi Olabayo Oluwasanu ◽  
Shukri F Mohamed ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Universal health coverage is one of the Sustainable Development Goal targets known to improve population health and reduce financial burden. There is little qualitative data on access to and quality of primary healthcare in West and East Africa. We elicited in-depth viewpoints of healthcare users and providers, and other stakeholders regarding access to and quality of healthcare.Methods: A qualitative case study was conducted in four communities in Nigeria, and one community each in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania in 2018. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 155 participants for 24 focus group discussions, 24 in-depth interviews, and 12 key informant interviews. The conceptual framework in this study combined elements of the Health Belief Model, Health Care Utilisation Model, four ‘As’ of access to care, and pathway model to better understand health-seeking behaviours of the study participants. The data were analysed with MAXQDA 2018 qualitative software to identify three themes identified a priori and one emerging theme.Results: Access to primary healthcare in the seven communities was limited. Quality of care was perceived to be unacceptable in public facilities whereas cost of care was unaffordable in private facilities. Patients and health providers and stakeholders highlighted shortage of equipment, frequent drug stock-outs and long waiting times as major issues, but had varying opinions on satisfaction with care. Use of herbal medicines and other traditional treatments delayed or deterred seeking modern healthcare in Nigerian sites. Conclusions: There was a substantial gap in primary healthcare coverage and quality in the selected communities in rural and urban East and West Africa. Alternative models of healthcare delivery should be used to fill this gap and facilitate achieving universal health coverage.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Renggli ◽  
Iddy Mayumana ◽  
Dominick Mboya ◽  
Christopher Charles ◽  
Christopher Mshana ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Universal Health Coverage only leads to the desired health outcomes if quality of health services is ensured. In Tanzania, quality has been a major concern for many years, including the problem of ineffective and inadequate routine supportive supervision of healthcare providers by council health management teams. To address this, we developed and assessed an approach to improve quality of primary healthcare through enhanced routine supportive supervision. Methods Mixed methods were used, combining trends of quantitative quality of care measurements with qualitative data mainly collected through in-depth interviews. The former allowed for identification of drivers of quality improvements and the latter investigated the perceived contribution of the new supportive supervision approach to these improvements. Results The results showed that the new approach managed to address quality issues that could be solved either solely by the healthcare provider, or in collaboration with the council. The new approach was able to improve and maintain crucial primary healthcare quality standards across different health facility level and owner categories in various contexts. Conclusion Together with other findings reported in companion papers, we could show that the new supportive supervision approach not only served to assess quality of primary healthcare, but also to improve and maintain crucial primary healthcare quality standards. The new approach therefore presents a powerful tool to support, guide and drive quality improvement measures within council. It can thus be considered a suitable option to make routine supportive supervision more effective and adequate.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Balraj ◽  
H Brand

Abstract Issue There are multiple small health insurance schemes throughout India. However, high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures, unaffordable and inequitable access to healthcare services still persist. In an attempt to address these issues and achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC), India launched the healthcare scheme ‘Ayushman Bharat’ (“long live India”) in 2018. Description The Ayushman Bharat (AB) scheme has two components which include 1) transforming the existing primary healthcare centers (PHC) under the control of State Governments and 2) the National Health Protection Scheme (NHPS) also known as “ModiCare” - a health insurance. The scheme aims to transform nearly 150.000 PHCs to deliver comprehensive primary healthcare services across the country by 2022. NHPS covers the costs of almost all secondary and many tertiary care procedures of about 40% of the total Indian population. The coverage will be approximately €6.400 per year per beneficiary family; 60% of the costs are borne by the Centre and 40% by the States. Results Approximately €127 million have already been allocated by the Centre towards the AB scheme for the fiscal year 2018-19. Till date, around 29 million health insurance cards have been issued, approximately 1,8 million beneficiaries have been admitted and around 15.291 hospitals have been empaneled under NHPS. However, there is no data available validating the usage of the health services yet. Few Indian states are yet to implement the AB scheme. Lessons For the first time, attempts have been made to provide affordable healthcare services to the Indian population under a single common initiative. However, the AB scheme fails to cover outpatient health services, which are an important part of OOP expenses in India. Main message The effort to launch Ayushman Bharat in a big, democratic and diverse country like India has to be lauded, which not only aims to make healthcare services affordable but also aligns itself to the concept of UHC.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. e000917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enyi Etiaba ◽  
Obinna Onwujekwe ◽  
Ayako Honda ◽  
Ogochukwu Ibe ◽  
Benjamin Uzochukwu ◽  
...  

BackgroundIn an attempt to achieve universal health coverage, Nigeria introduced a number of health insurance schemes. One of them, the Formal Sector Social Health Insurance Programme (FSSHIP), was launched in 2005 to provide health cover to federal government and formal private sector employees. It operates with two levels of purchasers, the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) and health maintenance organisations (HMOs). This study critically assesses purchasing arrangements between NHIS, HMOs and healthcare providers and determines how the arrangements function from a strategic purchasing perspective within the FSSHIP.MethodsA qualitative study undertaken in Enugu state, Nigeria, data were gathered through reviews of documents, 17 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with NHIS, HMOs and healthcare providers and two focus group discussions (FGDs) with FSSHIP enrolees. A strategic purchasing lens was used to guide data analysis.ResultsThe purchasing function was not being used strategically to influence provider behaviour and improve efficiency and quality in healthcare service delivery. For the purchaser–provider relationship, these actions are: accreditation of healthcare providers; monitoring of HMOs and healthcare providers and use of appropriate provider payment mechanisms for healthcare services at every level. The government lacks resources and political will to perform their stewardship role while provider dissatisfaction with payments and reimbursements adversely affected service provision to enrolled members. Underlying this inability to purchase, health services strategically is the two-tiered purchasing mechanism wherein NHIS is not adequately exercising its stewardship role to monitor and guide HMOs to fulfil their roles and responsibilities as purchasing administrators.ConclusionsPurchasing under the FSSHIP is more passive than strategic. Governance framework requires strengthening and clarity for optimal implementation so as to ensure that both levels of purchasers undertake strategic purchasing actions. Additional strengthening of NHIS is needed for it to have capacity to play its stewardship role in the FSSHIP.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Aktieva Tri Tjitrawati

AbstractMillions of Indonesian migrant workers living in other countries, most of them are illegal workers and are not covered by health insurance. They are very susceptible to disease because of poor quality of life and does not have access to health care. Sovereignty of the  recipient State confine Indonesia  to provide health protection for them,, as it has been provided by all the citizens in Indonesia through the mechanism of National Health Insurance (JKN). Protection of the right to health as part of human rights in this study is used as a starting point the imposition of obligations of the state, both sending and receiving, to cooperate in  improving the health of migrant workers. Cooperation can be done through the establishment of international agreements on the implementation of Universal Health Coverag, both in the sending and receiving States.IntisariJutaan buruh migran Indonesia tinggal di luar negeri, sebagian besar dari mereka adalah ilegal dan tidak tercakup oleh asuransi kesehatan. Mereka sangat rentan terhadap penyakit akibat buruknya kualitas hidup dan tidak dimilikinya akses terhadap sarana kesehatan.  Kedaulatan negara penerima menghalangi tangan negara pengirim untuk memberikan perlindungan kesehatan, sebagaimana yang telah diterima oleh semua warga di Indonesia melalui mekanisme Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN). Perlindungan hak atas kesehatan sebagai bagian dari hak asasi manusia dalam penelitian ini digunakan sebagai titik awal pengenaan kewajiban negara, baik negara pengirim maupun negara penerima, untuk bekerja sama dalam meningkatkan derajat kesehatan pekerja migran. Kerjasama dapat dilakukan melalui pembentukan perjanjian internasional mengenai penerapan Universal Health Coverage yang berlaku, baik di negara pengirim maupun negara penerima.


Author(s):  
Jan Abel Olsen

This chapter considers two different ways of organizing revenue collection in statutory healthcare schemes: social health insurance and taxation. The two models are commonly referred to as ‘Bismarck vs Beveridge’ after the men associated with the origin of these systems: the first German chancellor Otto von Bismarck (1815–1898), and the British economist Lord William Beveridge (1879–1963). The differences between these two compulsory prepayment schemes are discussed and compared with private health insurance. Based on a simple diagram introduced by the World Health Organization, three dimensions of coverage are illustrated. Some policy dilemmas are highlighted when attempting to achieve universal health coverage. Finally, various combinations of public and private prepayment schemes are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document