scholarly journals High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant compared with conventional chemotherapy for consolidation in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma—a randomized phase III trial (MATRix)

BMC Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Schorb ◽  
Juergen Finke ◽  
Andrés J. M. Ferreri ◽  
Gabriele Ihorst ◽  
Kristina Mikesch ◽  
...  
BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Schorb ◽  
Juergen Finke ◽  
Gabriele Ihorst ◽  
Benjamin Kasenda ◽  
Heidi Fricker ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 125 (9) ◽  
pp. 1403-1410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Omuro ◽  
Denise D. Correa ◽  
Lisa M. DeAngelis ◽  
Craig H. Moskowitz ◽  
Matthew J. Matasar ◽  
...  

Key Points We conducted a phase-2 study in newly diagnosed PCNSL utilizing R-MPV and HDC with ASCT. Excellent disease control and OS (2-year PFS: 79%) were observed, with an acceptable toxicity profile and minimal neurotoxicity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (14) ◽  
pp. 3378-3381
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Schorb ◽  
Benjamin Kasenda ◽  
Gabriele Ihorst ◽  
Florian Scherer ◽  
Julia Wendler ◽  
...  

Key Points Age-adapted high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation is safe and highly effective in elderly patients with PCNSL.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2872-2872
Author(s):  
Madhusmita Behera ◽  
Ambuj Kumar ◽  
Mohamed A. Kharfan-Dabaja ◽  
Benjamin Djulbegovic

Abstract Background: Primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is a rare plasma cell clonal disorder(8/million) characterized by extracellular deposits of material composed mainly of fragments of light chain immunoglobulin throughout a body. Standard chemotherapy (e.g. melphalan and prednisone) is associated with poor outcomes (typical median survival is between 12–18 months with less than 5% survive 10 years). Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has been increasingly advocated for treatment of AL. However, it is uncertain whether ASCT is better than standard chemotherapy. To address this uncertainty, we undertook a systematic review/meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplant (HSCT) versus conventional chemotherapy in patients with AL. Methods: Data search of published studies included Medline [all randomized controlled trials (RCTs)], Cochrane library and hand search of references. Studies were included if they were comparison trials of HSCT versus conventional chemotherapy, regardless if they were RCTs, prospective studies with historical control, or single arm studies. The studies were eligible if patients had biopsy proven AL with at least one major organ involved. Data were extracted on benefits as well as harms (overall survival, event-free survival, response, treatment related mortality, treatment-related morbidity). Results: Out of 34 identified studies only 13 met the inclusion criteria for the current systematic review (2 RCTs, 2 prospective non-randomized trials involving historical control, and 9 single arm trials). Altogether these trials enrolled 1056 patients. Pooled data from 4 trials with controls (RCT and non-RCT) found similar overall survival for ASCT and conventional therapy arms [hazard ratio (HR) of 1.10 (95% CI 0.88, 1.36, p=0.4); p= 0.6]. Analysis of data according to trial design also did not find any difference in survival [HR for RCTs was 1.10 (95% CI 0.88, 1.37) and for non RCTs HR was 0.98 (95% CI 0.29, 3.35)]. The complete hematological response was also similar in both arms in RCTs (Odds ratio [OR]=1.38, 95%CI 0.67, 2.85; p=0.4) and non RCTs (OR=1.78, 95%CI 0.22, 14.65; p=0.32). The pooled proportion of treatment-related deaths in the single arm studies for AHCT was 0.119 (95% CI = 0.09 to 0.14)]. Conclusion: The results from the meta-analysis indicate that there is no statistically significant difference between the treatment effects from high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT and conventional chemotherapy. Hence, the efficacy of ASCT in improving overall survival and complete hematological response remains to be proven.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4648-4648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastian von Tresckow ◽  
Aleksander Skotnicki ◽  
Igur Lisukov ◽  
Shivani Srivastava ◽  
David S. Morgan ◽  
...  

Introduction High dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the treatment of choice for Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients suffering from relapse or progression after first line therapy. However, patients with recurrence after ASCT have a very poor prognosis. Thus, the oral deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat was evaluated as maintenance therapy for patients at risk for relapse after ASCT to prevent recurrences. Methods HL patients after ASCT with at least one of the risk factors: primary refractory disease, early relapse (<12 months), multiple relapses, stage III/IV disease or hemoglobin <10,5 g/dl at relapse prior to transplant were randomized to receive oral panobinostat (45mg three times a week, every other week, QOW) or placebo (2:1 randomization) in this phase III randomized, double blind, placebo controlled multi-center trial. As per the original protocol, disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary endpoint. However, the trial was terminated prematurely due to slow recruitment and the new primary objective was the provision of drug to ongoing patients randomized to panobinostat in an open label phase and to the evaluation of safety in the whole patient population. Results The study was closed to enrollment and data were unblinded with only a total of 41 patients out of the planned 367 patients enrolled; 27 patients in the panobinostat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm. Three patients (1 from the panobinostat arm and 2 from the placebo arm) never received treatment. Data are reported for patients treated during the randomized phase and no formal statistical analyses were conducted. The median duration of treatment was longer in the placebo arm (217 days) than in the panobinostat arm (176 days, randomized phase). The majority of patients in both treatment arms had an exposure of ≥ 24 weeks (53.8% in the panobinostat arm, 75% in the placebo arm). In the panobinostat arm, the most common reasons that patients discontinued were due to withdrawal of consent (29.8%) and adverse events (22.2%), whereas in the placebo arm, patients most commonly discontinued due to disease progression (28.6%). Most adverse events (AEs) occurred more frequently in the panobinostat arm (randomized phase). The most frequently reported AEs as compared to the placebo arm included: diarrhea (88.5%/25%), nausea (57.7%/8.3%), vomiting (46.2%/25%), fatigue (34.6%/25%), neutropenia (26.9%/33.3%), thrombocytopenia (26.9%/8.3%), oropharyngeal pain (26.9%/0%), headache (23.1%/0%), nasopharyngitis (19.2%/0%), upper respiratory infection (19.2%/8.3%), decreased appetite (15.4%/16.7%), pyrexia (15.4%/8.3%), influenza like illness (15.4%/0%) and sinusitis (15.4%/8.3%). Overall, the incidence of grade 3/4 AEs was 65.4% in the panobinostat arm during the randomized phase and 41.7% in the placebo arm. In the panobinostat arm, the most frequently reported grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (26.9%), thrombocytopenia (15.4%), and diarrhea, vomiting and fatigue (all 11.5%). In the placebo arm, the most frequently reported grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (33.3%), leukopenia (16.7%) and herpes zoster (16.7%). Although efficacy could not be formally evaluated due to the small number of patients in this trial, it is interesting to note that more patients from the placebo arm discontinued from the study due to disease progression (28.6% vs. 14.8% panobinostat patients). Conclusion The safety observations from this study were consistent with the general safety profile known for panobinostat. The use of panobinostat in a maintenance setting in a QOW schedule appeared to have acceptable tolerability in a population of patients with HL who are at risk for relapse after high dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Disclosures: von Tresckow: Takeda: Honoraria, Reimbursement of congress, travel, and accommodation costs , Reimbursement of congress, travel, and accommodation costs Other; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Szer:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sureda:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Engert:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5-5
Author(s):  
Joyce Philip ◽  
Shivani Sharma ◽  
Vijayalakshmi Donthireddy

Background: Treatment for primary CNS lymphoma involves a methotrexate-based induction therapy followed by consolidation. The optimal consolidation treatment after induction with a high dose Methotrexate (HD-MTX), Rituximab and Temozolomide regimen has not been fully established. The CALGB 50202 regimen using Etoposide and Cytarabine consolidation was associated with significant toxicity. We sought to review the results of alternative consolidation regimens and evaluate the progression free survival and overall survival. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of alternative consolidation regimens such as autologous stem cell transplant and HDMTx alone. Patients diagnosed with primary CNS lymphoma between November 2012 and March 2019 were identified. All patients received the same induction chemotherapy based on the CALGB 50202 protocol. Data was collected for baseline characteristics, progression free survival and overall survival. Results: 38 patients had a diagnosis of primary CNS lymphoma. 15 patients received treatment as per the CALBG 50202 induction protocol with high dose Methotrexate, Rituximab and Temozolomide. Of the 15 patients, 11 patients (69%) achieved a complete remission (CR) after induction therapy. 7 patients received an autologous stem cell transplant for consolidation, 5 patients received HD-MTX alone for consolidation and one patient was placed on Lenalidomide maintenance. 2 patients did not receive any consolidation therapy due to progressive disease and/or death. At a median follow up of 2.7 years for the entire cohort, median PFS was 31.7+ months and median OS was 32.5+ months. At a median follow up of 2.7 years for patients who were consolidated with an autologous stem cell transplant, median PFS and median OS was 27.2+ and 32.5+ months respectively. At a median follow up of 5.5 years for patients who were consolidated with treatments other than transplant, median PFS and OS was 65.6+ months. There were no deaths attributed to treatment related toxicity. To date, 4 patients of the entire cohort have died, with a median survival time among surviving patients of 3.6 years (range, 0.68-7.05 years). There were no deaths attributed to treatment related toxicity. Conclusion: Patients with primary CNS lymphoma who received induction therapy as per CALGB 50202 regimen and received alternative consolidation therapies with either autologous stem cell transplant or HD-MTX based consolidation achieved prolonged PFS and OS comparable if not superior to the Etoposide and Cytarabine consolidation. Results of the ongoing CALGB 51101 trial will determine the utility of EA consolidation. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5086-5086
Author(s):  
Joanna Yeung ◽  
Sara Samiee ◽  
Qi Long Yi ◽  
Dominic Pantalony ◽  
Hong Chang

Abstract CD56 is a neural adhesion molecule and expressed in 70–80% cases of multiple myeloma (MM). Lack of CD56 expression has shown to be a poor prognosis in MM patients treated with conventional chemotherapy, but its prognostic relevance in MM treated with high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is not known. CD56 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry on bone marrow paraffin embed specimens from 107 MM cases undergoing Melphalan-based high dose therapy and ASCT. The 66 men and 41 women had a median age of 54 years. 53 patients had an IgG paraprotein, 30 IgA, 4 IgD, 15 light chain disease and 5 were nonsecretory. The median post-transplant follow-up was 20 months. Of 107 MM patients, 76 (71%) were CD56 positive and 31 negative. 27 died during the follow-up period including 7(23%) in CD56 negative and 20 (26%) in CD56 positive group; 50 were in relapse including 11 (35%) in CD56-negative, and 39 (51%) in CD56 positive group. The median overall survival for the CD56 positive patients was 48.1 months and for the CD56 negative patients, 44.8 months (p=0.67). The median progression free survival of the CD56 positive patients was 25.8 months and for the CD56 negative patients, 33.1 months (p=0.28). CD56 negative myeloma was associated with bone lesions (69% for CD56 positive vs 90% for CD56 negative group, p=0.032). However, CD56 was not associated with other biological factors including age, sex, hemoglobin, calcium, albumin, c-reactive protein, beta-2 microglobulin, immunoglobulin isotype, stage of the disease or bone marrow plasmacytosis. Furthermore, there was no correlation between CD56 expression and genetic aberrations including deletions of 13q14, 17p13.1 (p53), translocations t(11;14) or t(4;14) as evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In contrast to reports of CD56 in myeloma treated with conventional chemotherapy, we found CD56 negativity does not confer a poor prognosis in our patients, suggesting Melphalan-based high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT may overcome the adverse influence of CD56 negative myeloma.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2089-2089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Roberta Welch ◽  
Craig Steven Sauter ◽  
Matthew J. Matasar ◽  
Craig Moskowitz ◽  
Antonio Marcilio Padula Omuro

2089 Background: In two reports by Soussain et al, promising efficacy was observed in recurrent primary CNS lymphoma with induction cytarabine/VP-16 (CYVE) followed by HDC-ASCT (busulfan, thiotepa and cyclophosphamide [BTC]), but significant toxicity, mainly from CYVE, has limited widespread use. We report our experience with HDC-ASCT with alternative induction regimens. Methods: Retrospective review of pts with recurrent/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with CNS involvement treated with HDC-ASCT (2000-present). Results: Seventeen pts met inclusion criteria: med age= 58 (41-65); 9 were women; med KPS prior to transplant= 90 (range 70-100). At initial presentation, 10 had primary CNS lymphoma (ocular: 1); 7 had systemic NHL without CNS involvement; 1 had both systemic and CNS disease. Pts had been heavily pre-treated. Among those with PCNSL, high dose MTX was used in all pts and WBRT in 4. Two pts had received a previous HDC-ASCT. Among systemic NHL pts, various regimens were used, mostly R-CHOP(4), but also R-EPOCH (1), CVP (1), ICE (1) and CODOX-M (1). At CNS recurrence, pts received various induction regimens prior to HD-ASCT: high-dose methotrexate (MTX)-based chemotherapy (N= 13), cytarabine-based regimens (N=2), and other (N= 2). All pts achieved a CR or near CR prior to HDC-ASCT. Harvesting was obtained with G-CSF alone in 9 pts; 8 required plerixafor. Two pts failed mobilization N=15 received HDC-ASCT. The HDC consisted of BTC (N=13); 1 received BEAM and 1 received reduced intensity fludarabine, melphalan and alemtuzumab. Eight pts experienced a grade III or IV toxicity – most commonly fatigue, febrile neutropenia, and infection. One previously transplanted pt died from sepsis. With a med follow-up of 11 months, post-transplant med-PFS has not been reached. The 12m PFS was 92% (95% CI 56-98). Because no patient has progressed, the OS was identical to PFS. Conclusions: HDC-ASCT was a highly effective salvage approach in this population of recurrent/refractory CNS lymphoma. To reduce the risk of harvesting failure at the time of recurrence, harvesting stem cells at the time of initial treatment could be considered in pts with high risk for relapse.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document