scholarly journals Original article: role of adjuvant chemotherapy in a perioperative chemotherapy regimen for gastric cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Lichthardt ◽  
Alexander Kerscher ◽  
Ulrich A. Dietz ◽  
Christian Jurowich ◽  
Volker Kunzmann ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prajnan Das ◽  
Yixing Jiang ◽  
Jeffrey H. Lee ◽  
Manoop S. Bhutani ◽  
William A. Ross ◽  
...  

Most patients with localized gastric cancer require multimodality therapy. Surgery is the primary treatment for localized gastric cancer, although controversy exists about the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy in these patients. Recent studies have evaluated the role of laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic mucosal resection in selected patients. Multimodality treatment options for these patients include post-operative chemoradiation and perioperative chemotherapy. The Intergroup 0116 trial demonstrated that patients treated with surgery and post-operative chemoradiation had significantly higher overall survival compared to patients treated with surgery alone. The MAGIC trial showed that patients treated with perioperative epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil had significantly higher overall survival compared to patients treated with surgery alone. Other recent trials have evaluated the roles of preoperative chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy. Multidisciplinary evaluation plays a crucial role in the management of these patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid E. Slagter ◽  
Marieke A. Vollebergh ◽  
Edwin P. M. Jansen ◽  
Johanna W. van Sandick ◽  
Annemieke Cats ◽  
...  

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and has a high mortality rate. In the last decades, treatment strategy has shifted from an exclusive surgical approach to a multidisciplinary strategy. Treatment options for patients with resectable gastric cancer as recommended by different worldwide guidelines, include perioperative chemotherapy, pre- or postoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy. Although gastric cancer is a heterogeneous disease with respect to patient-, tumor-, and molecular characteristics, the current standard of care is still according to a one-size-fits-all approach. In this review, we discuss the background of the different treatment strategies in resectable gastric cancer including the current standard, the specific role of radiotherapy, and describe the current areas of research and potential strategies for personalization of therapy.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv228
Author(s):  
J. Jo ◽  
J.H. Baek ◽  
S. Koh ◽  
Y.J. Min ◽  
H.R. Cho ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 124-124
Author(s):  
P. Cen ◽  
Y. Xing ◽  
C. J. Wray ◽  
M. B. Fallon ◽  
V. I. Machicao ◽  
...  

124 Background: Limited data is available for the role of multimodality management for gastric adenocarcinoma and its outcome in the community. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes for 341 patients (pts) who were diagnosed with gastric cancer in a community-based health-care system, including 9 hospitals, from 2000 to 2009. Results: 148/341 pts had undergone surgery and were included in the analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 68 year (range: 32-96), 56% were male, 55% were Caucasian and 25% were black. The stage distribution was as follows: 27% (40 pts) localized, 61% (90 pts) locally advanced and 12% (18 pts) with distant metastasis. 98 pts (66%) received surgery alone, 22 pts (15%) received perioperative chemotherapy, and 28 pts (19%) received perioperative chemo-radiation. After a median follow-up time of 5.2 yrs, the median OS for the entire group was 1.9 years, and 88 deaths had occurred at the last follow up. By stage, the median OS was 7 yrs, 2.3 yrs, and 0.3 yrs for localized stage, regional stage, and metastatic disease, respectively. The 5-yr survival was significantly better in pts who received perioperative chemo-radiation (68%), compared to those who received with surgery alone (33%) or perioperative chemotherapy (0%) (p=0.002). The 5-yr survivals by stage and treatment are shown in the table. Conclusions: Perioperative chemo-radiation was associated with a significantly better OS compared to surgery alone. Trimodality therapy for gastric cancer appears to be underutilized in the community setting described here. The survival advantage of surgery plus chemoradiation compared to surgery plus chemotherapy remains controversial and should be investigated in clinical trials. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 3778-3783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuyuki Kawakami ◽  
Francesco Graziano ◽  
Go Watanabe ◽  
Annamaria Ruzzo ◽  
Daniele Santini ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 1143-1151
Author(s):  
Omar Abdel-Rahman

Aim: To assess the survival outcomes of patients with nonmetastatic gastric cancer according to the type of perioperative treatment strategy used (surgery-only, adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, perioperative chemotherapy) in a population-based setting. Materials & methods: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results research-plus database was explored, and patients with nonmetastatic gastric cancer who were treated with an oncologic surgery were reviewed. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to examine the impact of treatment strategy on overall and cancer-specific survival. Results: A total of 11,526 patients were found to be eligible and they were included in the current analysis. Looking at the percentages of different treatment strategies throughout the study years (2006–2017), the use of the following strategies increased: adjuvant chemotherapy (20.1 vs 10.6%), and perioperative chemotherapy (21.3 vs 0.5%); while the use of the following strategies decreased: surgery only (36.2 vs 58.2%), and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (22.4 vs 30.6%). Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, the following factors were associated with worse overall survival: older age (hazard [HR]: 1.021; 95% CI: 1.018–1.023), males (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.04–1.14), Black race (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.04–1.19), cardia subsite (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02–1.17), grade 3–4 (HR:1.32; 95% CI: 1.25–1.40), diffuse histology (HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.35–1.58), clinically node positive (HR:1.43; 95% CI: 1.34–1.53), total gastrectomy (HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.13–1.28), and surgery-only approach (HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.55–1.75). Conclusion: Among patients with localized gastric cancer, patients who were treated with surgery-only, and to a less extent, patients who were treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy have worse survival outcomes; while those treated with perioperative chemotherapy have the best survival outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 528-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masanori Terashima ◽  
Takaki Yoshikawa ◽  
Narikazu Boku ◽  
Seiji Ito ◽  
Akira Tsuburaya ◽  
...  

Abstract Perioperative treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer has been inconsistent between Japan and the Western countries. In Japan, D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is regarded as standard treatment, while neoadjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy is considered to be a standard in the Western countries. Stomach Cancer Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) has conducted many perioperative chemotherapy trials. After the publishing of positive results of ACTS-GC trial, stage-specific adjuvant chemotherapy protocols are planned. JCOG1104 was conducted as to demonstrate the non-inferiority of four courses of S-1 to standard eight courses of S-1, because the efficacy of S-1 appears to be sufficient in stage II. The trial failed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of four courses of S-1. S-1 for 1 year is still recognized to be a standard for stage II gastric cancer. For stage III, studies with more intensive treatments were planned as the efficacy of S-1 monotherapy seems to be insufficient. As in the Western countries, JCOG planned the perioperative chemotherapy. However, the clinical staging is a serious issue to select optimal patients for perioperative chemotherapy. JCOG conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate the validity of clinical staging in JCOG1302A. From the results of this study, cT3-4 and cN1–3 are selected as optimal candidate for perioperative chemotherapy. JCOG1509 was conducted to demonstrate the superiority of perioperative chemotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy in these cohorts. Perioperative chemotherapy for marginally resectable tumours such as linitis plastica or extensive nodal disease and special type of cancer like HER2 positive are also conducted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document