scholarly journals The ideal approach for treatment of cT1N+ and cT2Nany esophageal cancer.: a NCDB analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Binhao Huang ◽  
Ernest G. Chan ◽  
Arjun Pennathur ◽  
James D. Luketich ◽  
Jie Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Ideal Approach ◽  
Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer ◽  
The Ideal

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery is recommended for locally advanced esophageal cancer. With the inaccuracies of clinical staging particularly for cT1N+ and cT2Nany tumors, some have proposed consideration of surgery followed by adjuvant treatment. Our objective is to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy vs surgery followed by adjuvant therapy, and to identify the ideal sequence of treatment in patients with cT1N+ and cT2Nany tumors. Methods We performed an analysis utilizing the National Cancer Database (2006-2015) identifying all patients with cT1N+ and cT2Nany esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy. The treatment was stratified as: neoadjuvant therapy (NT), adjuvant therapy (AT) and combination therapy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant (CT) groups and outcomes were analyzed. Results We identified 2795 patients with 81.9% (n=2289) receiving NT, 10.2% (n=285) AT, and 7.9% (n=221) CT. There were no significant differences noted in survival among AT, NT, and CT group in cT1N+(P=0.376), cT2N-(P=0.436), cT2N+(P=0.261) esophageal cancer by multivariate analysis using Cox regression model. This relationship held true in both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Conclusion In clinical T1N+, T2Nany patients, there was no evident superiority of NT over AT. Surgery followed by adjuvant therapy can be considered to be an alternative option in these patients. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

scholarly journals The Ideal Approach for Treatment of cT1N+ and cT2Nany Esophageal Cancer.: A NCDB Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binhao Huang ◽  
Ernest G. Chan ◽  
Arjun Pennathur ◽  
James D. Luketich ◽  
Jie Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Ideal Approach ◽  
Additional Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer ◽  
The Ideal

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery is recommended for locally advanced esophageal cancer. With the inaccuracies of clinical staging particularly for cT1N+ and cT2Nany tumors, some have proposed consideration of surgery followed by adjuvant treatment. Our objective is to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy vs surgery followed by adjuvant therapy, and to identify the ideal sequence of treatment in patients with cT1N+ and cT2Nany tumors.Methods We performed an analysis utilizing the National Cancer Database (2006-2015) identifying all patients with cT1N+ and cT2Nany esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy and additional chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The treatment was stratified as: neoadjuvant therapy (NT), adjuvant therapy (AT) and combination therapy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant (CT) groups and outcomes were analyzed.Results We identified 2795 patients with 81.9% (n=2289) receiving NT, 10.2% (n=285) AT, and 7.9% (n=221) CT. There were no significant differences noted in survival among AT, NT, and CT group in cT1N+(P=0.376), cT2N-(P=0.436), cT2N+(P=0.261) esophageal cancer by multivariate analysis using Cox regression model. This relationship held true in both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Conclusion In clinical T1N+, T2Nany patients, there was no evident superiority of NT over AT. Surgery followed by adjuvant therapy can be considered to be an alternative option in these patients. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

scholarly journals The Ideal Approach for Treatment of cT1N+ and cT2Nany Esophageal Cancer.: A NCDB Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binhao Huang ◽  
Ernest G. Chan ◽  
Arjun Pennathur ◽  
James D. Luketich ◽  
Jie Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Ideal Approach ◽  
Additional Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer ◽  
The Ideal

Abstract BackgroundNeoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery is recommended for locally advanced esophageal cancer. With the inaccuracies of clinical staging particularly for cT1N+ and cT2Nany tumors, some have proposed consideration of surgery followed by adjuvant treatment. Our objective is to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy vs surgery followed by adjuvant therapy, and to identify the ideal sequence of treatment in patients with cT1N+ and cT2Nany tumors.MethodsWe performed an analysis utilizing the National Cancer Database (2006-2015) identifying all patients with cT1N+ and cT2Nany esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy and additional chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The treatment was stratified as: neoadjuvant therapy (NT), adjuvant therapy (AT) and combination therapy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant (CT) groups and outcomes were analyzed.ResultsWe identified 2795 patients with 81.9% (n=2289) receiving NT, 10.2% (n=285) AT, and 7.9% (n=221) CT. There were no significant differences noted in survival among AT, NT, and CT group in cT1N+(P=0.376), cT2N-(P=0.436), cT2N+(P=0.261) esophageal cancer by multivariate analysis using Cox regression model. This relationship held true in both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. ConclusionIn clinical T1N+, T2Nany patients, there was no evident superiority of NT over AT. Surgery followed by adjuvant therapy can be considered to be an alternative option in these patients. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients without local nodal metastases following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 111-111
Author(s):  
Christopher Duane Nevala-Plagemann ◽  
Samual Francis ◽  
Courtney Christine Cavalieri ◽  
Shane Lloyd ◽  
Ignacio Garrido-Laguna
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Postoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Nodal Metastases ◽  
Advanced Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

111 Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by esophagectomy is the current standard of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. The potential benefit of additional postoperative chemotherapy is still under investigation. In this study, we utilized the National Cancer Database to assess the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who were found to have node negative disease (pN0) following surgery. Methods: Patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant CRT followed by esophagectomy from 2004 to 2014 were retrospectively identified using the National Cancer Database. Patients who were postoperatively staged as pN0 were then separated based on whether or not they received adjuvant chemotherapy. Using Kaplan-Meier estimation and a multivariate cox regression analysis, the overall survival of those who received adjuvant therapy was then compared to those who received neoadjuvant CRT alone. Results: 3,159 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer underwent neoadjuvant CRT and were found to be pN0 following surgery. 119 of these patients received postoperative chemotherapy. The 1, 5, and 8-year overall survival in those receiving adjuvant therapy was 95.9%, 49.9%, and 47.7% compared to 85.8%, 44.6%, and 33.0% in those receiving neoadjuvant CRT alone, respectively (p = 0.019). Based on multivariate analysis, receiving adjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with increased overall survival (p = 0.011; HR 0.658; 95% CI, 0.476 to 0.908). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival in patients with locally advance esophageal cancer who have no evidence of local nodal metastases following surgery. Additional clinical trials are needed to further confirm which patients may benefit from adjuvant therapy and to determine the optimal postoperative therapeutic regimen.

Survivin expression in esophageal cancer: Association with histomorphological response to neoadjuvant therapy and prognosis

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4536-4536 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Vallboehmer ◽  
E. Kuhn ◽  
J. Brabender ◽  
R. Metzger ◽  
U. Warnecke-Eberz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Protein Expression ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survivin Expression ◽  
Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Survivin Protein ◽  
Histopathologic Response ◽  
Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

4536 Background: The poor prognosis associated with locally advanced esophageal cancer prompted an evaluation of combined modality treatments including neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in combination with surgery. However, it has been well established that only patients with a complete pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy will have a significant survival benefit. Therefore, predictive markers to allow a tailored radiochemotherapy are needed. The aim of this study was to examine the association of the protein expression of survivin, an inhibitor of apoptosis, with histopathologic response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and prognosis of patients with locally-advanced esophageal cancer. Methods: 59 patients with esophageal cancer (cT2–4, Nx, M0) received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (cisplatin, 5-FU, 36 Gy) followed by esophagectomy. Histomorphologic regression was defined as major response when resected specimens contained less than 10 % and as minor response when resected specimens contained more than 10 % of residual vital tumor cells. Pre- and post-therapeutic intratumoral protein expression of survivin was determined and correlated with clinicopathologic parameters. Results: The pre-therapeutic intratumoral survivin protein expression was not associated with any clinicopathologic factor, including histopathologic response and prognosis. Survivin protein expression was significantly reduced during neoadjuvant therapy, showing lower levels in post-therapeutic tumor samples (p<0.01). Higher postoperative survivin levels were significantly associated with a higher ypT-stage (p<0.009), a poorer histopathologic response (p<0.01) and a shorter overall survival (p<0.028). Conclusions: The intratumoral protein expression of survivin was significantly down-regulated during neoadjuvant therapy, whereas a higher survivin level after pre-operative therapy was significantly associated with a worse histopathologic response and prognosis. Therapeutic strategies which are able to reduce survivin expression or to block survivin mediated pathways might increase the histopathologic response rate and prognosis in the multimodal therapy of patients with locally-advanced esophageal cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Survival differences between preoperative and postoperative radiation in esophageal cancer treated with combined modality therapy: A SEER analysis.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 78-78
Author(s):  
Andrzej Pawel Wojcieszynski ◽  
Abigail Berman Milby ◽  
John Peter Plastaras ◽  
James M. Metz ◽  
Smith Apisarnthanarax
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Combined Modality Therapy ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Advanced Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Carcinoma Of The Esophagus ◽  
Survival Differences ◽  
Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

78 Background: The effect of radiation therapy (RT) sequencing with surgery on clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal cancer patients is unclear. We hypothesized that RT given prior to surgery has superior survival outcomes compared to RT delivered after surgery. Methods: Patients with the following inclusion criteria were identified within 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries from 1988-2006: adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, esophagectomy, and RT. Data on demographics, tumor characteristics, and survival outcomes were extracted and compared between patients receiving preoperative and those receiving postoperative RT. Cox regression univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify parameters that were associated with cause-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 2,579 patients met the defined criteria. Of these patients, 1,689 received preop RT and 890 received postop RT. Patients receiving preop RT compared to postop RT had improved 5-yr CSS (41% vs. 31%, p<0.0001) and OS (33% vs. 23%, p<0.0001). On univariate analysis, RT sequence, histology, T stage, nodal status, number lymph nodes examined, age, gender, marital status, race, and county income were significant independent predictors of OS. On multivariate analysis ( table ), preop RT continued to remain statistically significant for OS (HR 0.88; p = 0.034). Conclusions: Preoperative RT is associated with superior overall and cause-specific survival compared to postoperative RT and should be the preferred approach in combination with surgery for locally advanced esophageal cancer. [Table: see text]

A National Cancer Database analysis of treatment utilization and associated outcomes in elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 138-138
Author(s):  
Gregory Riccardo Vlacich ◽  
Pamela Parker Samson ◽  
Stephanie Mabry Perkins ◽  
Michael Charles Roach ◽  
Parag J. Parikh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Palliative Therapy ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Treatment Utilization ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Advanced Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Trimodality Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

138 Background: Elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer pose a therapeutic challenge since definitive treatment involves aggressive combined-modality therapy. Whether these individuals are offered or benefit from these approaches in the modern, trimodality era has not been widely explored. Methods: Patients ≥ 70 years old with clinical stage II and III esophageal cancer diagnosed between 1998 and 2012 were identified from the National Cancer Database and stratified based on treatment. Variables independently associated with treatment utilization were evaluated using logistic regression and mortality hazard evaluated using Cox-proportional hazards analysis. The primary aim was to compare overall survival by treatment group. The secondary aim was to identify variables associated with receiving each modality. Results: A total of 21,593 patients were identified. Median and maximum ages were 77 and 90 respectively. In 12.9%, no therapy was delivered, 24.3% received palliative therapy, 37.1% received definitive chemoradiation, 5.6% received esophagectomy alone, and 10.0% received trimodality therapy. On multivariate analysis, age ≥ 80 (OR 0.73, p < 0.001), female gender (OR 0.81, p < 0.001), and treatment at high-volume centers (OR 0.83, p = 0.008) were associated with a decreased likelihood of palliative therapy over no treatment. Age ≥ 80 (OR 0.15, p < 0.001), female gender (OR 0.80, p = 0.03), and non-Caucasian race (OR 0.63, p < 0.001) were associated with decreased trimodality use compared to definitive chemoradiation. Each treatment independently demonstrated improved survival compared to no therapy: palliative treatment (HR 0.49), concurrent chemoradiation (HR 0.36), esophagectomy (HR 0.31), trimodality therapy (HR 0.25), all p < 0.001. Conclusions: Any therapy, including palliative care, was associated with improved survival compared to no treatment in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Subsets of patients are less likely to receive aggressive therapy based on social and institutional factors. Care should be taken to not unnecessarily deprive elderly patients of treatment that may improve survival.

Outcomes of recurrence after complete response to definitive chemoradiotherapy for stage II/III (non–T4) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 179-179
Author(s):  
Hiroki Kuwabara ◽  
Ken Kato ◽  
Yusuke Sasaki ◽  
Naoki Takahashi ◽  
Hirokazu Shoji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Locoregional Failure ◽  
Distant Failure ◽  
Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

179 Background: Recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for locally advanced esophageal cancer is associated with poor outcome. We examined patterns of recurrence and clinical outcomes in patients with recurrence after complete response (CR) to dCRT. Methods: We retrospectively investigated 238 patients who had achieved initial CR after dCRT for locally advanced esophageal cancer between January 2000 and December 2010. From among these patients we selected 95 who had developed disease recurrence after CR. Overall survival was defined as survival time from recurrence to death and was calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with the Cox regression model to determine prognostic factors for survival. Results: The characteristics of the 95 patients were as follows: male: female = 84:11; median age = 64 years (range 46 to 80); clinical stage at diagnosis (UICC 6th edition) IIA/IIB/III = 20/31/44; and performance status at recurrence (0/1) = (51/44). Primary CRT consisted of 5-FU+cisplatin (n = 87), 5-FU+nedaplatin (n = 3), S-1+cisplatin (n = 3), 5-FU+cisplatin+ nimotuzumab (n = 1), or docetaxel (n = 1). The pattern of recurrence was locoregional failure (n = 53) or any distant failure (n = 42). Median time from the start of dCRT to recurrence was 13.0 months, and median survival time from recurrence to death was 19.6 months. Median survival time according to the pattern of failure was 34.7 months (locoregional failure) or 17.0 months (any distant failure). Application of the Cox regression model, including the additional prognostic variables of age, ECOG performance status, number of organs in which metastases were present, and LDH, revealed that any distant failure (hazard ratio [HR] 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 4.1; P = 0.01) and recurrence before 13.0 months (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.2 to 3.6; P = 0.01) were predictors of poor overall survival. Conclusions: Early recurrence and any distant failure were associated with poor prognosis after CR to dCRT for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document