scholarly journals Correction to: Effectiveness of the German disease management programs: quasi-experimental analyses assessing the population-level health impact

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Burns ◽  
Christoph Kurz ◽  
Michael Laxy
Keyword(s):  
Disease Management ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Disease Management Programs ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Experimental Analyses

scholarly journals Effectiveness of the German disease management programs: quasi-experimental analyses assessing the population-level health impact

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Burns ◽  
Christoph Kurz ◽  
Michael Laxy
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Disease Management ◽  
Time Lag ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Synthetic Control ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Disease Management Programs ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background In 2002–2003 disease management programs (DMPs) for type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease were introduced in Germany to improve the management of these conditions. Today around 6 million Germans aged 56 and older are enrolled in one of the DMPs; however, their effect on health remains unclear. Methods We estimated the impact of German DMPs on circulatory and all-cause mortality using a synthetic control study. Specifically, using routinely available data, we compared pre and post-intervention trends in mortality of individuals aged 56 and older for 1998–2014 in Germany to trends in other European countries. Results Average circulatory and all-cause mortality in Germany and the synthetic control was 1.63 and 3.24 deaths per 100 persons. Independent of model choice, circulatory and all-cause mortality decreased non-significantly less in Germany than in the synthetic control; for the model with a 3 year time lag, for example, by 0.12 (95%-CI: − 0.20; 0.44) and 0.22 (95%-CI: − 0.40; 0.66) deaths per 100 persons, respectively. Further main analyses, as well as sensitivity and subgroup analyses supported these results. Conclusions We observed no effect on circulatory or all-cause mortality at the population-level. However, confidence intervals were wide, meaning we could not reject the possibility of a positive effect. Given the substantial costs for administration and operation of the programs, further comparative effectiveness research is needed to clarify the value of German DMPs for type 2 diabetes and CHD.

Quality of Life Is Improved in Uninsured Heart Failure Patients in Disease Management Programs in Public Hospitals

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. S6
Author(s):  
Aurelia O'Connell ◽  
Tracy Finegan ◽  
Jennifer Galindo ◽  
Gisele Munoz ◽  
Andrene Schonberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Disease Management ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Disease Management Programs ◽  
Heart Failure Patients

scholarly journals Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care—an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Wangler ◽  
Michael Jansky
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Disease Management ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Chronically Ill ◽  
Disease Management Programs ◽  
Federal States ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Chronically Ill Patients

Summary Background Disease management programs (DMPs) were set up in Germany in 2003 to improve outpatient care of chronically ill patients. The present study looks at the attitudes and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) in relation to DMPs, how they rate them almost 20 years after their introduction and where they see a need for improvement. Methods A total of 1504 GPs in the Federal States of Rhineland Palatinate, Saarland and Hesse were surveyed between December 2019 and March 2020 using a written questionnaire. Results In total, 58% of respondents rate DMPs positively and regard them as making a useful contribution to primary care. The guarantee of regular, structured patient care and greater compliance are regarded as particularly positive aspects. It was also established that diagnostic and therapeutic knowledge was expanded through participation in DMPs. 57% essentially follow the DMP recommendations for (drug) treatment. Despite positive experiences of DMPs in patient care, the GPs surveyed mention various challenges (documentation requirements, frequent changes to the programmes, inflexibility). Univariant linear regression analysis revealed factors influencing the satisfaction with DMPs, such as improvement of compliance and clearly defined procedures in medical care. Conclusion Most of the GPs surveyed consider the combination of continuous patient care and evidence-based diagnosis and treatment to be a great advantage. To better adapt DMPs to the conditions of primary care, it makes sense to simplify the documentation requirements, to regulate cooperation with other healthcare levels more clearly and to give GPs more decision-making flexibility. Increased inclusion of GP experience in the process of developing and refining DMPs can be helpful.

Who benefits most in disease management programs: Improving target efficiency

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Simcoe ◽  
Maryaline Catillon ◽  
Paul Gertler
Keyword(s):  
Disease Management ◽  
Disease Management Programs

scholarly journals The Public Health Impact of Delaying a Second Dose of the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccine

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago Romero-Brufau ◽  
Ayush Chopra ◽  
Alex J Ryu ◽  
Esma Gel ◽  
Ramesh Raskar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vaccination Strategy ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Vaccination Rate ◽  
Agent Based Modeling ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Agent Based ◽  
Cumulative Mortality ◽  
Vaccination Rates ◽  
The Public

AbstractObjectivesTo estimate population health outcomes under delayedsecond dose versus standard schedule SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination.DesignAgent-based modeling on a simulated population of 100,000 based on a real-world US county. The simulation runs were replicated 10 times. To test the robustness of these findings, simulations were performed under different estimates for single-dose efficacy and vaccine administration rates, and under the possibility that a vaccine prevents only symptoms but not asymptomatic spread.Settingpopulation level simulation.Participants100,000 agents are included in the simulation, with a representative distribution of demographics and occupations. Networks of contacts are established to simulate potentially infectious interactions though occupation, household, and random interactionsInterventionswe simulate standard Covid-19 vaccination, versus delayed-second-dose vaccination prioritizing first dose. Sensitivity analyses include first-dose vaccine efficacy of 70%, 80% and 90% after day 12 post-vaccination; vaccination rate of 0.1%, 0.3%, and 1% of population per day; assuming the vaccine prevents only symptoms but not asymptomatic spread; and an alternative vaccination strategy that implements delayed-second-dose only for those under 65 years of age.Main outcome measurescumulative Covid-19 mortality over 180 days, cumulative infections and hospitalizations.ResultsOver all simulation replications, the median cumulative mortality per 100,000 for standard versus delayed second dose was 226 vs 179; 233 vs 207; and 235 vs 236; for 90%, 80% and 70% first-dose efficacy, respectively. The delayed-second-dose strategy was optimal for vaccine efficacies at or above 80%, and vaccination rates at or below 0.3% population per day, both under sterilizing and non-sterilizing vaccine assumptions, resulting in absolute cumulative mortality reductions between 26 and 47 per 100,000. The delayed-second-dose for those under 65 performed consistently well under all vaccination rates tested.ConclusionsA delayed-second-dose vaccination strategy, at least for those under 65, could result in reduced cumulative mortality under certain conditions.

scholarly journals Participation in Disease Management Programs and Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Fischer ◽  
Jens Höpner ◽  
Saskia Hartwig ◽  
Michel Noutsias ◽  
Rafael Mikolajczyk
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Disease Management ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Disease Management Programs ◽  
Cardiovascular Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events

Abstract Background Cardiovascular diseases are still the main cause of death in the western world. However, diminishing mortality rates of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are motivating the need to investigate the process of stationary and ambulatory secondary prevention after AMI. Besides cardiac rehabilitation, disease management programs (DMPs) are an important component of outpatient care after AMI in Germany. This study aims to analyze outcomes after AMI among those who participated in DMPs and stationary cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in a region with overall increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Methods: On the basis of data from a regional myocardial infarction registry and a 2-years follow up period, we assessed the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in relation to participation in CR and DMP, risk factors for complications and individual health, and lifestyle characteristics. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to compare survival time until an adverse event occurred.Results Out of 1,094 observed patients AMI, 272 were enrolled in a DMP. A weak association between DMP participation and hazard rates for MACE compared to non-enrollees was found in the crude model (hazard ratio = 0.93; 95% confidence interval = 0.65–1.33). When adjusted for possible confounders, this difference disappeared (1.03; 0.72–1.48). Furthermore, smokers and obese patients showed a distinctly lower chance of DMP enrollment. In contrast, participants of CR showed a lower risk for MACE in crude (0.52; 0.41–0.65) and adjusted analysis (0.56; 0.44–0.71).Conclusions Participation in DMP was not associated with a lower risk of MACE, while CR showed beneficial effects. Adjustment only slightly changed effect estimates in both cases, still potential effects of confounding need to be considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document