scholarly journals Employees’ perceptions of patient safety culture in Norwegian nursing homes and home care services

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eline Ree ◽  
Siri Wiig
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Letícia Lousada ◽  
Francisco Clécio Dutra ◽  
Beatriz Silva ◽  
Natália Oliveira ◽  
Ismael Bastos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Safety culture in primary care and home care services is still poorly studied, although this levels of care are the gateways to health services. This study aims to evaluate the culture of patient safety in Primary and Home Care Services. Methods: This is an observational cross-sectional study carried out with 147 professionals from nine district linked to the Home Care Program and six primary health care units. For the evaluation of culture, the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) was used, which considers a positive patient safety culture with scores ≥ 75. Results: Men who work in home care with time of professional experience of three to four years scored better for the Safety Climate, Job Satisfaction, Teamwork Climate and Total SAQ. Perception of management and Working Conditions received lower scores from professionals with long time of experience.Conclusions: It is concluded that the safety culture evaluation was better in the home care service when compared to the primary health care service.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Letícia Lousada ◽  
Francisco Clécio Dutra ◽  
Beatriz Silva ◽  
Natália Oliveira ◽  
Ismael Bastos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The safety culture in primary care and home care services is still poorly studied, although this level of care is the gateway to health services. This study aims to evaluate the culture of patient safety in Primary and Home Care Services. Methods: This is an observational cross-sectional study carried out with 147 professionals from nine district linked to the Better Home Program and six basic health units. For the evaluation of culture, the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) was used, which considers a positive patient safety culture with scores ≥ 75. Results: Men who work in home care with length of service of three to four years scored better for the Safety Climate, Job Satisfaction, Team Work Climate and Total SAQ. Perception of management and Working Conditions received lower scores from professionals with longer working time.Conclusions: It is concluded that the evaluation of safety culture in the home care service was positive when compared to basic health units.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnar Tschudi Bondevik ◽  
Dag Hofoss ◽  
Bettina Sandgathe Husebø ◽  
Ellen Catharina Tveter Deilkås

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laetitia Teixeira ◽  
Maria João Azevedo ◽  
Sara Alves ◽  
Cátia L. Pires ◽  
Constança Paúl

Purpose In Portugal, the three main kinds of care services available for older people are nursing homes, day centers and home care services. The use of these care services is mostly based on complex socioeconomic and functional criteria; however it is not clear if this placement corresponds to a higher/lower risk of adverse outcomes. The purposes of this paper are: to characterize clients of each type of service; to estimate the proportion of individuals at perceived risk of each adverse outcome according to type of service; to assess the ability of the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC) to identify the risk profiles according to type of service. Design/methodology/approach The sample comprised individuals aged 65+ (n=224), receiving care at home, in day centers or in nursing homes. The identification of individuals at risk for three adverse outcomes (institutionalization, hospitalization and death) was performed using a short pre-screen instrument (RISC). Findings The RISC identified mental state issues as the unique factor that differentiated clients according the type of care services (χ2 (6, N=224)=20.96, p=0.002), with day center presenting the lowest percentage of mental health concerns and nursing home presenting the highest percentage (44.44 and 71.91 percent, respectively). Additionally, a gradient was found between perceived risk of adverse outcomes (institutionalization and hospitalization) and care of levels required. Originality/value The RISC can be used to discriminate people in different settings of care and can be helpful in the selection of groups at risk that will benefit more from available services.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrine Cappelen ◽  
Karina Aase ◽  
Marianne Storm ◽  
Jørn Hetland ◽  
Anette Harris

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document