Eave ribbons treated with transfluthrin can protect both users and non-users against malaria vectors

Abstract Background Eave ribbons treated with spatial repellents effectively prevent human exposure to outdoor-biting and indoor-biting malaria mosquitoes, and could constitute a scalable and low-cost supplement to current interventions, such as insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). This study measured protection afforded by transfluthrin-treated eave ribbons to users (personal and communal protection) and non-users (only communal protection), and whether introducing mosquito traps as additional intervention influenced these benefits. Methods Five experimental huts were constructed inside a 110 m long, screened tunnel, in which 1000 Anopheles arabiensis were released nightly. Eave ribbons treated with 0.25 g/m2 transfluthrin were fitted to 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 huts, achieving 0, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100% coverage, respectively. Volunteers sat near each hut and collected mosquitoes attempting to bite them from 6 to 10 p.m. (outdoor-biting), then went indoors to sleep under untreated bed nets, beside which CDC-light traps collected mosquitoes from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. (indoor-biting). Caged mosquitoes kept inside the huts were monitored for 24 h-mortality. Separately, eave ribbons, UV–LED mosquito traps (Mosclean) or both the ribbons and traps were fitted, each time leaving the central hut unfitted to represent non-user households and assess communal protection. Biting risk was measured concurrently in all huts, before and after introducing interventions. Results Transfluthrin-treated eave ribbons provided 83% and 62% protection indoors and outdoors respectively to users, plus 57% and 48% protection indoors and outdoors to the non-user. Protection for users remained constant, but protection for non-users increased with eave ribbons coverage, peaking once 80% of huts were fitted. Mortality of mosquitoes caged inside huts with eave ribbons was 100%. The UV–LED traps increased indoor exposure to users and non-users, but marginally reduced outdoor-biting. Combining the traps and eave ribbons did not improve user protection relative to eave ribbons alone. Conclusion Transfluthrin-treated eave ribbons protect both users and non-users against malaria mosquitoes indoors and outdoors. The mosquito-killing property of transfluthrin can magnify the communal benefits by limiting unwanted diversion to non-users, but should be validated in field trials against pyrethroid-resistant vectors. Benefits of the UV–LED traps as an intervention alone or alongside eave ribbons were however undetectable in this study. These findings extend the evidence that transfluthrin-treated eave ribbons could complement ITNs.

Download Full-text

Sub-lethal aquatic doses of pyriproxyfen may increase pyrethroid resistance in malaria mosquitoes

PLoS ONE ◽

10.1371/journal.pone.0248538 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (3) ◽

pp. e0248538

Author(s):

Mercy A. Opiyo ◽

Halfan S. Ngowo ◽

Salum A. Mapua ◽

Monica Mpingwa ◽

Nuru Nchimbi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pyrethroid Resistance ◽

Mortality Rates ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Bed Nets ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Biochemical Basis ◽

Larval Habitats ◽

Emergent Adults ◽

Malaria Mosquitoes ◽

Lethal Doses

Background Pyriproxyfen (PPF), an insect growth hormone mimic is widely used as a larvicide and in some second-generation bed nets, where it is combined with pyrethroids to improve impact. It has also been evaluated as a candidate for auto-dissemination by adult mosquitoes to control Aedes and Anopheles species. We examined whether PPF added to larval habitats of pyrethroid-resistant malaria vectors can modulate levels of resistance among emergent adult mosquitoes. Methodology Third-instar larvae of pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis (both laboratory-reared and field-collected) were reared in different PPF concentrations, between 1×10−9 milligrams active ingredient per litre of water (mgAI/L) and 1×10−4 mgAI/L, or no PPF at all. Emergent adults escaping these sub-lethal exposures were tested using WHO-standard susceptibility assays on pyrethroids (0.75% permethrin and 0.05% deltamethrin), carbamates (0.1% bendiocarb) and organochlorides (4% DDT). Biochemical basis of pyrethroid resistance was investigated by pre-exposure to 4% PBO. Bio-efficacies of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets, Olyset® and PermaNet 2.0 were also examined against adult mosquitoes with or without previous aquatic exposure to PPF. Results Addition of sub-lethal doses of PPF to larval habitats of pyrethroid-resistant An. arabiensis, consistently resulted in significantly reduced mortalities of emergent adults when exposed to pyrethroids, but not to bendiocarb or DDT. Mortality rates after exposure to Olyset® nets, but not PermaNet 2.0 were also reduced following aquatic exposures to PPF. Pre-exposure to PBO followed by permethrin or deltamethrin resulted in significant increases in mortality, compared to either insecticide alone. Conclusions Partially-resistant mosquitoes exposed to sub-lethal aquatic concentrations of PPF may become more resistant to pyrethroids than they already are without such pre-exposures. Studies should be conducted to examine whether field applications of PPF, either by larviciding or other means actually exacerbates pyrethroid-resistance in areas where signs of such resistance already exist in wild the vector populations. The studies should also investigate mechanisms underlying such magnification of resistance, and how this may impact the potential of PPF-based interventions in areas with pyrethroid resistance.

Download Full-text

Preferred resting surfaces of dominant malaria vectors inside different house types in rural south-eastern Tanzania

10.21203/rs.2.18018/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Betwel John Msugupakulya ◽

Emmanuel W. Kaindoa ◽

Halfan S. Ngowo ◽

Japhet M. Kihonda ◽

Najat F. Kahamba ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Anopheles Funestus ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Bed Nets ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Rural South ◽

South Eastern ◽

Malaria Mosquitoes ◽

Common House ◽

Contact Insecticides

Abstract Background Malaria control in Africa relies extensively on indoor residual spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). IRS typically targets mosquitoes resting on walls, and in few cases, roofs and ceilings, using contact insecticides. Unfortunately, little attention is paid to where malaria vectors actually rest indoors, and how such knowledge could be used to improve IRS. This study investigated preferred resting surfaces of two major malaria vectors, Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis , inside four common house types in rural south-eastern Tanzania.Methodology The assessment was done inside 80 houses including: 20 with thatched roofs and mud walls, 20 with thatched roofs and un-plastered brick walls, 20 with metal roofs and un-plastered brick walls, and 20 with metal roofs and plastered brick walls, across four villages. In each house, resting mosquitoes were sampled in mornings (6am-8am), evenings (6pm-8pm) and at night (11pm-12.00am) using Prokopack aspirators from multiple surfaces (walls, undersides of roofs, floors, furniture, utensils, clothing, curtains and bed nets).Results Overall, only 26% of An. funestus and 18% of An. arabiensis were found on walls. In grass-thatched houses, 33-55% of An. funestus and 43-50% of An. arabiensis rested under roofs, while in metal-roofed houses, only 16-20% of An. funestus and 8-30% of An. arabiensis rested under roofs. Considering all data together, approximately 40% of mosquitoes rested on surfaces not typically targeted by IRS, i.e. floors, furniture, utensils, clothing and bed nets. These proportions were particularly high in metal-roofed houses (47-53% of An. funestus ; 60-66% of An. arabiensis ).Conclusion While IRS typically uses contact insecticides to target adult mosquitoes on walls, and occasionally roofs and ceilings, significant proportions of vectors rest on surfaces not usually sprayed. This gap exceeds one-third of malaria mosquitoes in grass-thatched houses, and can reach two-thirds in metal-roofed houses. Where field operations exclude roofs during IRS, the gaps can be much greater. In conclusion, there is need for locally-obtained data on mosquito resting behaviours and how these influence the overall impact and costs of IRS. This study also emphasizes the need for alternative approaches, e.g. house screening, which broadly tackle mosquitoes beyond areas reachable by IRS and ITNs.

Download Full-text

Sub-lethal aquatic doses of pyriproxyfen may increase pyrethroid resistance in malaria mosquitoes

10.1101/2021.01.11.426299 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Mercy A. Opiyo ◽

Halfan S. Ngowo ◽

Salum A. Mapua ◽

Monica Mpingwa ◽

Nancy S. Matowo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pyrethroid Resistance ◽

Mortality Rates ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Bed Nets ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Biochemical Basis ◽

Larval Habitats ◽

Emergent Adults ◽

Malaria Mosquitoes ◽

Lethal Doses

AbstractBackgroundPyriproxyfen (PPF), an insect growth hormone mimic is widely used as a larvicide and in some second-generation bed nets, where it is combined with pyrethroids to improve impact. It has also been evaluated as a candidate for auto-dissemination by adult mosquitoes to control Aedes and Anopheles species. We examined whether PPF added to larval habitats of pyrethroid-resistant malaria vectors can modulate levels of resistance among emergent adult mosquitoes.MethodologyThird-instar larvae of pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis (both laboratory-reared and field-collected) were reared in different PPF concentrations, between 1×10-9 milligrams active ingredient per litre of water (mgAI/L) and 1×10-4 mgAI/L, or no PPF at all. Emergent adults escaping these sub-lethal exposures were tested using WHO-standard susceptibility assays on pyrethroids (0.75% permethrin and 0.05% deltamethrin), carbamates (0.1% bendiocarb) and organochlorides (4% DDT). Biochemical basis of pyrethroid resistance was investigated by pre-exposure to 4% PBO. Bio-efficacies of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets, Olyset® and PermaNet 2.0 were also examined against adult mosquitoes with or without previous aquatic exposure to PPF.ResultsAddition of sub-lethal doses of PPF to larval habitats of pyrethroid-resistant An. arabiensis, consistently resulted in significantly reduced mortalities of emergent adults when exposed to pyrethroids, but not to bendiocarb or DDT. Mortality rates after exposure to Olyset® nets, but not PermaNet 2.0 were also reduced following aquatic exposures to PPF. Pre-exposure to PBO followed by permethrin or deltamethrin resulted in significant increases in mortality, compared to either insecticide alone.ConclusionsPartially-resistant mosquitoes exposed to sub-lethal aquatic concentrations of PPF may become more resistant to pyrethroids than they already are without such pre-exposures. Studies should be conducted to examine whether field applications of PPF, either by larviciding or other means actually excercebates pyrethroid-resistance in areas where signs of such resistance already exist in wild the vector populations. The studies should also investigate mechanisms underlying such magnification of resistance, and how this may impact the potential of PPF-based interventions in areas with pyrethroid resistance.

Download Full-text

Preferred resting surfaces of dominant malaria vectors inside different house types in rural south-eastern Tanzania

10.21203/rs.2.18018/v2 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Betwel John Msugupakulya ◽

Emmanuel W. Kaindoa ◽

Halfan S. Ngowo ◽

Japhet M. Kihonda ◽

Najat F. Kahamba ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Anopheles Funestus ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Bed Nets ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Rural South ◽

South Eastern ◽

Malaria Mosquitoes ◽

Common House ◽

Contact Insecticides

Download Full-text

Creating mosquito-free outdoor spaces using transfluthrin-treated chairs and ribbons

10.21203/rs.2.19697/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

John Paliga Masalu ◽

Marceline Finda ◽

Gerry F. Killeen ◽

Halfan S. Ngowo ◽

Polius G. Pinda ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Anopheles Funestus ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Domestic Spaces ◽

Host Seeking ◽

Outdoor Spaces ◽

Outdoor Biting ◽

Outdoor Environments ◽

Almost All

Abstract Background Residents of malaria-endemic communities spend several hours outdoors performing different activities, e.g. cooking, story-telling or eating, thereby exposing themselves to potentially-infectious mosquitoes. This compromises effectiveness of indoor interventions, notably long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS). This study characterized common peri-domestic spaces in rural south-eastern Tanzania, and assessed protective efficacies of hessian fabric mats and ribbons treated with the spatial repellent, transfluthrin and respectively fitted to chairs and outdoor kitchens, against mosquitoes.Methods Two hundred households were surveyed, and their most-used peri-domestic spaces physically characterized. Protective efficacies of locally-made transfluthrin-emanating chairs and hessian ribbons were tested in outdoor environments of eight households using volunteer-occupied exposure-free double net traps. CDC light traps were used to estimate host-seeking mosquito densities within open-structure outdoor kitchens. Field-collected Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus mosquitoes were exposed underneath the chairs to estimate 24h-mortality. Finally, WHO insecticide susceptibility tests were conducted on wild-caught Anopheles from the villages.Results Approximately half (52%) of houses had verandas. Aside from these verandas, most houses also had peri-domestic spaces where residents stayed most times (67% of houses with verandas and 94% of non-veranda houses). Two-thirds of these spaces were sited under trees, and only one third (34.4%) were built-up. The outdoor structures were usually makeshift kitchens having roofs and partial walls. Transfluthrin-treated chairs reduced outdoor-biting An. arabiensis densities by 70-76% while transfluthrin-treated hessian ribbons fitted to the outdoor kitchens caused 81% reduction in the general peri-domestic area. Almost all the field-collected An. arabiensis (99.4%) and An. funestus (100%) exposed under transfluthrin-treated chairs died. The An. arabiensis were susceptible to non-pyrethroids (pirimiphos methyl & bendiocarb) but resistant to pyrethroids commonly used on LLINs (deltamethrin & permethrin).Conclusion Most houses had actively-used peri-domestic outdoor spaces where exposure to mosquitoes occurred. The transfluthrin-treated chair and ribbons reduced outdoor-biting malaria vectors in these peri-domestic spaces, and also elicited significant mortality among pyrethroid-resistant field-caught malaria vectors. These two new prototype formats for transfluthrin emanators, if developed further, may constitute new options for complementing LLINs and IRS with outdoor protection against malaria and other mosquito-borne pathogens in areas where peri-domestic human activities are common.

Download Full-text

A low-cost repellent for malaria vectors in the Americas: results of two field trials in Guatemala and Peru

Malaria Journal ◽

10.1186/1475-2875-6-101 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 101 ◽

Cited By ~ 29

Author(s):

Sarah J Moore ◽

Samuel T Darling ◽

Moisés Sihuincha ◽

Norma Padilla ◽

Gregor J Devine

Keyword(s):

Low Cost ◽

Field Trials ◽

Malaria Vectors

Download Full-text

Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus s.s. biting pattern in Dielmo, an area of low level exposure to malaria vectors.

10.21203/rs.3.rs-24165/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Souleymane Doucoure ◽

Omar Thiaw ◽

Amélé N. Wotodjo ◽

Charles Bouganali ◽

Nafissatou Diagne ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Malaria Transmission ◽

Anopheles Funestus ◽

Molecular Techniques ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Bed Nets ◽

Low Level ◽

Biting Rate ◽

Outdoor Biting ◽

Night And Day ◽

Biting Behaviour

Abstract Background: In Dielmo, Senegal, the widespread use of long lasting insecticidal nets has decreased both the incidence of malaria and the density of the anopheles population. However, persistent low-level malaria transmission may hamper efforts to eliminate the disease. Therefore, continuous monitoring of the vector population is needed in order to improve knowledge of anopheles biting behaviour and to readjust control interventions.Methods: In 2015, anopheles were collected every month for a whole year and each specimen was identified using morphological and molecular techniques. The biting pattern of each species was analysed according to night (7pm–7am) and day (7am–11am) periods, the place of biting and the season. The ELISA CSP technique was used to evaluate the entomological inoculation rate (EIR).Results: An. arabiensis and An. funestus s.s. were found to be the main vectors biting human in Dielmo. Overall, the biting rate was low, at 3.84bites per night (bpn) and 1.27 bites per day (bpd), respectively. The EIR was 2.51 and 5.03 infected bites per year during the night and day, respectively. During the night, the An. arabiensis and An. funestus biting rate was 1.81 bpn and 1.71 bpn, respectively (p=0.80). During daylight hours, their aggressiveness decreased to 0.51 bpd and 0.73 bpd for An. arabiensis and An. funestus, respectively (p=0.30). During the night, depending on the seasons, only An. funestus displayed a significant outdoor biting behaviour both in the rainy and dry seasons, while during the day, no specific trend of indoor or outdoor biting was observed, regardless of the season for both vectors.Conclusion: This study highlighted low level anopheles nocturnal and diurnal biting and the associated risk of malaria transmission. It showed also the influence of the season on the indoor and outdoor biting pattern, indicating that the human population could be exposed all year round to a low level of anopheles bites. Control programs should increase awareness of the use of bed-nets throughout the year, particularly shortly after dawn when people are still indoors.

Download Full-text

Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus biting patterns in Dielmo, an area of low level exposure to malaria vectors

10.21203/rs.3.rs-24165/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Souleymane Doucoure ◽

Omar Thiaw ◽

Amélé N. Wotodjo ◽

Charles Bouganali ◽

Nafissatou Diagne ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Malaria Transmission ◽

Anopheles Arabiensis ◽

Anopheles Funestus ◽

Sensu Stricto ◽

Molecular Techniques ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Bed Nets ◽

Low Level ◽

Biting Rate ◽

Outdoor Biting

Abstract Background In Dielmo, Senegal, the widespread use of long-lasting insecticidal nets has decreased both the incidence of malaria and the density of the Anopheles population. However, persistent low-level malaria transmission may hamper efforts to eliminate the disease. Therefore, continuous monitoring of the vector population is needed in order to improve knowledge of Anopheles biting behaviour and to readjust control interventions.Methods In 2015, Anopheles were collected every month for a whole year and each specimen was identified using morphological and molecular techniques. The biting pattern of each species was analysed according to night (7pm–7am) and morning (7am–11am) periods, the place of biting and the season. The ELISA CSP technique was used to assess the Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite rate to evaluate the entomological inoculation rate (EIR).Results Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus sensu stricto were found to be the main vectors biting humans. Overall, the biting rate was low, at 3.84bites per night (bpn) and 1.27 bites per morning (bpm), respectively (IRR =3.04, CI = [1.84-5.00], p<0.001). The EIR was 2.51 and 5.03 infectious bites per year during the night and morning, respectively. During the night, the An. arabiensis and An. funestus biting rate was 1.81 bpn and 1.71 bpn, respectively (IRR=0.95, CI= [0.46-1.92], p=0.88). During the morning, their density decreased to 0.51 bpm and 0.73 bpm for An. arabiensis and An. funestus, respectively (IRR=1.47, CI= [0.58-3.71], p=0.41). During the night and the morning, no specific trend of indoor or outdoor biting was observed in the dry and rainy season for both vectors. Conclusion This study highlighted low level Anopheles nocturnal and diurnal biting and the associated risk of malaria transmission. It showed also the influence of the season on the indoor and outdoor biting pattern, indicating that the human population could be exposed all year round to a low level of Anopheles bites. Control programmes should increase awareness of the use of bed nets throughout the year and promote the development and implementation of complimentary tools to target Anopheles biting shortly after dawn when people are still indoors.

Download Full-text

Creating mosquito-free outdoor spaces using transfluthrin-treated chairs and ribbons

10.21203/rs.2.19697/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

John Paliga Masalu ◽

Marceline Finda ◽

Gerry F. Killeen ◽

Halfan S. Ngowo ◽

Polius G. Pinda ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Anopheles Funestus ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Domestic Spaces ◽

Host Seeking ◽

Outdoor Spaces ◽

Outdoor Biting ◽

Outdoor Environments ◽

Almost All

Abstract Background: Residents of malaria-endemic communities spend several hours outdoors performing different activities, e.g. cooking, story-telling or eating, thereby exposing themselves to potentially-infectious mosquitoes. These behaviors compromise effectiveness of indoor interventions, notably long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS). This study characterized common peri-domestic spaces in rural south-eastern Tanzania, and assessed protective efficacies of hessian fabric mats and ribbons treated with the spatial repellent, transfluthrin and respectively fitted to chairs and outdoor kitchens, against mosquitoes. Methods : Two hundred households were surveyed, and their most-used peri-domestic spaces physically characterized. Protective efficacies of locally-made transfluthrin-emanating chairs and hessian ribbons were tested in outdoor environments of 28 households in dry and wet seasons, using volunteer-occupied exposure-free double net traps. CDC light traps were used to estimate host-seeking mosquito densities within open-structure outdoor kitchens. Field-collected Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus mosquitoes were exposed underneath the chairs to estimate 24h-mortality. Finally, WHO insecticide susceptibility tests were conducted on wild-caught Anopheles from the villages. Results : Approximately half (52%) of houses had verandas. Aside from these verandas, most houses also had peri-domestic spaces where residents stayed most times (67% of houses with verandas and 94% of non-veranda houses). Two-thirds of these spaces were sited under trees, and one third (34.4%) were built-up. The outdoor structures were usually makeshift kitchens having roofs and partial walls. Transfluthrin-treated chairs reduced outdoor-biting An. arabiensis densities by 70-85%, while transfluthrin-treated hessian ribbons fitted to the outdoor kitchens caused 77-81% reduction in the general peri-domestic area. Almost all the field-collected An. arabiensis (99.4%) and An. funestus (100%) exposed under transfluthrin-treated chairs died. The An. arabiensis were susceptible to non-pyrethroids (pirimiphos methyl & bendiocarb) but resistant to pyrethroids commonly used on LLINs (deltamethrin & permethrin). Conclusion: Most houses had actively-used peri-domestic outdoor spaces where exposures to mosquitoes occur. Both the transfluthrin-treated chairs and ribbons reduced outdoor-biting malaria vectors in the peri-domestic spaces, and elicited significant mortality among pyrethroid-resistant field-caught malaria vectors. These two prototype formats, if developed further, may constitute new options for complementing LLINs and IRS with outdoor protection against malaria and other mosquito-borne diseases in areas with significant peri-domestic activities. Keywords : Peri-domestic spaces, transfluthrin-treated chairs, eave ribbons, transfluthrin, spatial repellents, outdoor-biting, malaria vectors, Ifakara Health Institute.

Download Full-text