Creating mosquito-free outdoor spaces using transfluthrin-treated chairs and ribbons

Abstract Background: Residents of malaria-endemic communities spend several hours outdoors performing different activities, e.g. cooking, story-telling or eating, thereby exposing themselves to potentially-infectious mosquitoes. These behaviors compromise effectiveness of indoor interventions, notably long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS). This study characterized common peri-domestic spaces in rural south-eastern Tanzania, and assessed protective efficacies of hessian fabric mats and ribbons treated with the spatial repellent, transfluthrin and respectively fitted to chairs and outdoor kitchens, against mosquitoes. Methods : Two hundred households were surveyed, and their most-used peri-domestic spaces physically characterized. Protective efficacies of locally-made transfluthrin-emanating chairs and hessian ribbons were tested in outdoor environments of 28 households in dry and wet seasons, using volunteer-occupied exposure-free double net traps. CDC light traps were used to estimate host-seeking mosquito densities within open-structure outdoor kitchens. Field-collected Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus mosquitoes were exposed underneath the chairs to estimate 24h-mortality. Finally, WHO insecticide susceptibility tests were conducted on wild-caught Anopheles from the villages. Results : Approximately half (52%) of houses had verandas. Aside from these verandas, most houses also had peri-domestic spaces where residents stayed most times (67% of houses with verandas and 94% of non-veranda houses). Two-thirds of these spaces were sited under trees, and one third (34.4%) were built-up. The outdoor structures were usually makeshift kitchens having roofs and partial walls. Transfluthrin-treated chairs reduced outdoor-biting An. arabiensis densities by 70-85%, while transfluthrin-treated hessian ribbons fitted to the outdoor kitchens caused 77-81% reduction in the general peri-domestic area. Almost all the field-collected An. arabiensis (99.4%) and An. funestus (100%) exposed under transfluthrin-treated chairs died. The An. arabiensis were susceptible to non-pyrethroids (pirimiphos methyl & bendiocarb) but resistant to pyrethroids commonly used on LLINs (deltamethrin & permethrin). Conclusion: Most houses had actively-used peri-domestic outdoor spaces where exposures to mosquitoes occur. Both the transfluthrin-treated chairs and ribbons reduced outdoor-biting malaria vectors in the peri-domestic spaces, and elicited significant mortality among pyrethroid-resistant field-caught malaria vectors. These two prototype formats, if developed further, may constitute new options for complementing LLINs and IRS with outdoor protection against malaria and other mosquito-borne diseases in areas with significant peri-domestic activities. Keywords : Peri-domestic spaces, transfluthrin-treated chairs, eave ribbons, transfluthrin, spatial repellents, outdoor-biting, malaria vectors, Ifakara Health Institute.

Download Full-text

Creating mosquito-free outdoor spaces using transfluthrin-treated chairs and ribbons

10.21203/rs.2.19697/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

John Paliga Masalu ◽

Marceline Finda ◽

Gerry F. Killeen ◽

Halfan S. Ngowo ◽

Polius G. Pinda ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Anopheles Funestus ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Domestic Spaces ◽

Host Seeking ◽

Outdoor Spaces ◽

Outdoor Biting ◽

Outdoor Environments ◽

Almost All

Abstract Background Residents of malaria-endemic communities spend several hours outdoors performing different activities, e.g. cooking, story-telling or eating, thereby exposing themselves to potentially-infectious mosquitoes. This compromises effectiveness of indoor interventions, notably long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS). This study characterized common peri-domestic spaces in rural south-eastern Tanzania, and assessed protective efficacies of hessian fabric mats and ribbons treated with the spatial repellent, transfluthrin and respectively fitted to chairs and outdoor kitchens, against mosquitoes.Methods Two hundred households were surveyed, and their most-used peri-domestic spaces physically characterized. Protective efficacies of locally-made transfluthrin-emanating chairs and hessian ribbons were tested in outdoor environments of eight households using volunteer-occupied exposure-free double net traps. CDC light traps were used to estimate host-seeking mosquito densities within open-structure outdoor kitchens. Field-collected Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus mosquitoes were exposed underneath the chairs to estimate 24h-mortality. Finally, WHO insecticide susceptibility tests were conducted on wild-caught Anopheles from the villages.Results Approximately half (52%) of houses had verandas. Aside from these verandas, most houses also had peri-domestic spaces where residents stayed most times (67% of houses with verandas and 94% of non-veranda houses). Two-thirds of these spaces were sited under trees, and only one third (34.4%) were built-up. The outdoor structures were usually makeshift kitchens having roofs and partial walls. Transfluthrin-treated chairs reduced outdoor-biting An. arabiensis densities by 70-76% while transfluthrin-treated hessian ribbons fitted to the outdoor kitchens caused 81% reduction in the general peri-domestic area. Almost all the field-collected An. arabiensis (99.4%) and An. funestus (100%) exposed under transfluthrin-treated chairs died. The An. arabiensis were susceptible to non-pyrethroids (pirimiphos methyl & bendiocarb) but resistant to pyrethroids commonly used on LLINs (deltamethrin & permethrin).Conclusion Most houses had actively-used peri-domestic outdoor spaces where exposure to mosquitoes occurred. The transfluthrin-treated chair and ribbons reduced outdoor-biting malaria vectors in these peri-domestic spaces, and also elicited significant mortality among pyrethroid-resistant field-caught malaria vectors. These two new prototype formats for transfluthrin emanators, if developed further, may constitute new options for complementing LLINs and IRS with outdoor protection against malaria and other mosquito-borne pathogens in areas where peri-domestic human activities are common.

Download Full-text

Protecting migratory farmers in rural Tanzania using eave ribbons treated with the spatial mosquito repellent, transfluthrin

Malaria Journal ◽

10.1186/s12936-019-3048-8 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 18 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Johnson K. Swai ◽

Arnold S. Mmbando ◽

Halfan S. Ngowo ◽

Olukayode G. Odufuwa ◽

Marceline F. Finda ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Anopheles Funestus ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Rice Farmers ◽

Rural Tanzania ◽

Host Seeking ◽

Outdoor Biting ◽

Spatial Repellent ◽

Open Structures ◽

Epidemiological Impact ◽

River Valleys

Abstract Background Many subsistence farmers in rural southeastern Tanzania regularly relocate to distant farms in river valleys to tend to crops for several weeks or months each year. While there, they live in makeshift semi-open structures, usually far from organized health systems and where insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) do not provide adequate protection. This study evaluated the potential of a recently developed technology, eave ribbons treated with the spatial repellent transfluthrin, for protecting migratory rice farmers in rural southeastern Tanzania against indoor-biting and outdoor-biting mosquitoes. Methods In the first test, eave ribbons (0.1 m × 24 m each) treated with 1.5% transfluthrin solution were compared to untreated ribbons in 24 randomly selected huts in three migratory communities over 48 nights. Host-seeking mosquitoes indoors and outdoors were monitored nightly (18.00–07.00 h) using CDC light traps and CO2-baited BG malaria traps, respectively. The second test compared efficacies of eave ribbons treated with 1.5% or 2.5% transfluthrin in 12 huts over 21 nights. Finally, 286 farmers were interviewed to assess perceptions about eave ribbons, and their willingness to pay for them. Results In the two experiments, when treated eave ribbons were applied, the reduction in indoor densities ranged from 56 to 77% for Anopheles arabiensis, 36 to 60% for Anopheles funestus, 72 to 84% for Culex, and 80 to 98% for Mansonia compared to untreated ribbons. Reduction in outdoor densities was 38 to 77% against An. arabiensis, 36 to 64% against An. funestus, 63 to 88% against Culex, and 47 to 98% against Mansonia. There was no difference in protection between the two transfluthrin doses. In the survey, 58% of participants perceived the ribbons to be effective in reducing mosquito bites. Ninety per cent were willing to pay for the ribbons, the majority of whom were willing to pay but less than US$2.17 (5000 TZS), one-third of the current prototype cost. Conclusions Transfluthrin-treated eave ribbons can protect migratory rice farmers, living in semi-open makeshift houses in remote farms, against indoor-biting and outdoor-biting mosquitoes. The technology is acceptable to users and could potentially complement ITNs. Further studies should investigate durability and epidemiological impact of eave ribbons, and the opportunities for improving affordability to users.

Download Full-text

Passive Outdoor Host Seeking Device (POHD): Designing and Evaluation against Outdoor Biting Malaria Vectors

The Scientific World JOURNAL ◽

10.1155/2020/4801068 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2020 ◽

pp. 1-15

Author(s):

Stella T. Kessy ◽

Ladslaus L. Mnyone ◽

Bruno A. Nyundo ◽

Issa N. Lyimo

Keyword(s):

Carbon Dioxide ◽

Malaria Transmission ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Natural Environments ◽

Release Formulation ◽

Experimental Hut ◽

Host Seeking ◽

Outdoor Biting ◽

Residual Malaria Transmission

Odor-baited devices are increasingly needed to compliment long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) for control of residual malaria transmission. However, the odor-baited devices developed so far are bulky, dependent on the source of electricity and carbon dioxide (CO2), and they are logistically unsuitable for scaling up in surveillance and control of malaria vectors. We designed a passive and portable outdoor host seeking device (POHD) and preliminarily evaluated suitable components against Anopheles arabiensis that maintains residual malaria transmission. Experiments were conducted using semifield reared An. arabiensis within the semifield system at Ifakara Health Institute (IHI) in southeastern Tanzania. These mosquitoes were exposed to Suna traps® baited with BG lures or source of light and augmented with carbon dioxide (CO2) in view of identifying best attractants necessary to improve attractiveness of designed POHD. Two Suna traps® were hanged at the corner but outside the experimental hut in a diagonal line and rotated between four corners to control for the effect of position and wind direction on mosquito catches. Furthermore, mosquitoes were also exposed to either a bendiocarb-treated or bendiocarb-untreated POHD baited with Mbita blend, Ifakara blend, and worn socks and augmented with warmth (i.e., 1.5 liter bottle of warm water) inside an experimental hut or a screened rectangular box. This study demonstrated that mosquitoes were more strongly attracted to Suna trap® baited with BG lures and CO2 relative to those traps baited with a source of light and CO2. The POHD baited with synthetic blends attracted and killed greater proportion of An. arabiensis compared with POHD baited with worn socks. Efficacy of the POHD was unaffected by source of warmth, and it was reduced by about 50% when the device was tested inside a screened rectangular box relative to closed experimental hut. Overall, this study demonstrates that the POHD baited with synthetic blends (Mbita and Ifakara blends) and bendiocarb can effectively attract and kill outdoor biting malaria vector species. Such POHD baited with synthetic blends may require the source of CO2 to enhance attractiveness to mosquitoes. Further trials are, therefore, ongoing to evaluate attractiveness of improved design of POHD baited with slow-release formulation of synthetic blends and sustainable source of CO2 to malaria vectors under semifield and natural environments.

Download Full-text

Anopheles funestus mosquitoes from rural south-eastern Tanzania may have stronger resistance to pyrethroids than the other malaria vector, Anopheles arabiensis

10.21203/rs.3.rs-19762/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Polius Gerazi Pinda ◽

Claudia Eichenberger ◽

Halfan S Ngowo ◽

Dickson S Msaky ◽

Said Abbasi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Malaria Transmission ◽

Anopheles Arabiensis ◽

Pyrethroid Resistance ◽

Anopheles Funestus ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

The Other ◽

Sub Saharan Africa ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

South Eastern

Abstract Background: Long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) have greatly reduced malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa, but are threatened by insecticide resistance. In south-eastern Tanzania, pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles funestus are now implicated in > 80% of malaria infections, even in villages where the species occurs at lower densities than the other vector species, Anopheles arabiensis. This study compared the intensities of resistance between the two malaria vectors, so as to improve options for control. Methods: The study used WHO assays with 1×, 5× and 10× insecticide doses to assess levels of resistance, followed by synergist bioassays to understand possible mechanisms of the observed resistance phenotypes. The tests involved adult mosquitoes collected from villages across two districts in south-eastern Tanzania and identified using morphological and molecular approaches.Findings: At baseline doses (1×), both species were resistant to the two pyrethroids (permethrin and deltamethrin) but susceptible to the organophosphate (pirimiphos-methyl). An. funestus, but not An. arabiensis was also resistant to the carbamate (bendiocarb) at baseline doses. Both species were generally resistant to DDT, except An.arabiensis from one village. An. funestus showed strong resistance to pyrethroids, surviving the 5× and 10× doses except in one village. Pre-exposure to the synergist, piperonyl butoxide (PBO), enhanced the potency of pyrethroid in both An. arabiensis and An. funestus achieving mortalities >98%, except for An. funestus from two villages for which permethrin-associated mortalities exceeded 90% but not 98%. Conclusions: In these communities where An. funestus dominates malaria transmission, this study may suggest that the species also have much stronger resistance to pyrethroids than its counterpart, An. arabiensis and can survive more classes of insecticides, including carbamates. The pyrethroid resistance in both species appears to be mostly metabolic and may be temporarily addressed using synergists, e.g. PBO. These findings may explain the continued persistence and dominance of An. funestus despite widespread use of pyrethroid-treated LLINs, and inform new choices of interventions to tackle malaria transmission in such settings. These may include PBO-based LLINs or improved IRS with compounds to which the vectors are susceptible. Additional field validation of these indications will be necessary using age-synchronized mosquitoes.

Download Full-text

Preferred resting surfaces of dominant malaria vectors inside different house types in rural south-eastern Tanzania

10.21203/rs.2.18018/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Betwel John Msugupakulya ◽

Emmanuel W. Kaindoa ◽

Halfan S. Ngowo ◽

Japhet M. Kihonda ◽

Najat F. Kahamba ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Anopheles Funestus ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Bed Nets ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Rural South ◽

South Eastern ◽

Malaria Mosquitoes ◽

Common House ◽

Contact Insecticides

Abstract Background Malaria control in Africa relies extensively on indoor residual spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). IRS typically targets mosquitoes resting on walls, and in few cases, roofs and ceilings, using contact insecticides. Unfortunately, little attention is paid to where malaria vectors actually rest indoors, and how such knowledge could be used to improve IRS. This study investigated preferred resting surfaces of two major malaria vectors, Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis , inside four common house types in rural south-eastern Tanzania.Methodology The assessment was done inside 80 houses including: 20 with thatched roofs and mud walls, 20 with thatched roofs and un-plastered brick walls, 20 with metal roofs and un-plastered brick walls, and 20 with metal roofs and plastered brick walls, across four villages. In each house, resting mosquitoes were sampled in mornings (6am-8am), evenings (6pm-8pm) and at night (11pm-12.00am) using Prokopack aspirators from multiple surfaces (walls, undersides of roofs, floors, furniture, utensils, clothing, curtains and bed nets).Results Overall, only 26% of An. funestus and 18% of An. arabiensis were found on walls. In grass-thatched houses, 33-55% of An. funestus and 43-50% of An. arabiensis rested under roofs, while in metal-roofed houses, only 16-20% of An. funestus and 8-30% of An. arabiensis rested under roofs. Considering all data together, approximately 40% of mosquitoes rested on surfaces not typically targeted by IRS, i.e. floors, furniture, utensils, clothing and bed nets. These proportions were particularly high in metal-roofed houses (47-53% of An. funestus ; 60-66% of An. arabiensis ).Conclusion While IRS typically uses contact insecticides to target adult mosquitoes on walls, and occasionally roofs and ceilings, significant proportions of vectors rest on surfaces not usually sprayed. This gap exceeds one-third of malaria mosquitoes in grass-thatched houses, and can reach two-thirds in metal-roofed houses. Where field operations exclude roofs during IRS, the gaps can be much greater. In conclusion, there is need for locally-obtained data on mosquito resting behaviours and how these influence the overall impact and costs of IRS. This study also emphasizes the need for alternative approaches, e.g. house screening, which broadly tackle mosquitoes beyond areas reachable by IRS and ITNs.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of different deployment strategies for larviciding to control malaria: a simulation study

Malaria Journal ◽

10.1186/s12936-021-03854-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Manuela Runge ◽

Salum Mapua ◽

Ismail Nambunga ◽

Thomas A. Smith ◽

Nakul Chitnis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Malaria Transmission ◽

Critical Role ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Malaria Prevalence ◽

Transmission Model ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Relative Reduction ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Host Seeking ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background Larviciding against malaria vectors in Africa has been limited to indoor residual spraying and insecticide-treated nets, but is increasingly being considered by some countries as a complementary strategy. However, despite progress towards improved larvicides and new tools for mapping or treating mosquito-breeding sites, little is known about the optimal deployment strategies for larviciding in different transmission and seasonality settings. Methods A malaria transmission model, OpenMalaria, was used to simulate varying larviciding strategies and their impact on host-seeking mosquito densities, entomological inoculation rate (EIR) and malaria prevalence. Variations in coverage, duration, frequency, and timing of larviciding were simulated for three transmission intensities and four transmission seasonality profiles. Malaria transmission was assumed to follow rainfall with a lag of one month. Theoretical sub-Saharan African settings with Anopheles gambiae as the dominant vector were chosen to explore impact. Relative reduction compared to no larviciding was predicted for each indicator during the simulated larviciding period. Results Larviciding immediately reduced the predicted host-seeking mosquito densities and EIRs to a maximum that approached or exceeded the simulated coverage. Reduction in prevalence was delayed by approximately one month. The relative reduction in prevalence was up to four times higher at low than high transmission. Reducing larviciding frequency (i.e., from every 5 to 10 days) resulted in substantial loss in effectiveness (54, 45 and 53% loss of impact for host-seeking mosquito densities, EIR and prevalence, respectively). In seasonal settings the most effective timing of larviciding was during or at the beginning of the rainy season and least impactful during the dry season, assuming larviciding deployment for four months. Conclusion The results highlight the critical role of deployment strategies on the impact of larviciding. Overall, larviciding would be more effective in settings with low and seasonal transmission, and at the beginning and during the peak densities of the target species populations. For maximum impact, implementers should consider the practical ranges of coverage, duration, frequency, and timing of larviciding in their respective contexts. More operational data and improved calibration would enable models to become a practical tool to support malaria control programmes in developing larviciding strategies that account for the diversity of contexts.

Download Full-text

Laboratory and field evaluation of MAÏA®, an ointment containing N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) against mosquitoes in Burkina Faso

Malaria Journal ◽

10.1186/s12936-021-03755-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Alphonse Traoré ◽

Gérard Niyondiko ◽

Antoine Sanou ◽

Franck Langevin ◽

N’Falé Sagnon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Burkina Faso ◽

Laboratory Tests ◽

Mosquito Species ◽

Anopheles Funestus ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Negative Control ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Malaria Vector Control ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

H 30

Abstract Background Malaria vector control relies upon the use of insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying. However, as the emergency of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors grows, the effectiveness of these measures could be limited. Alternative tools are needed. In this context, repellents can play an important role against exophagic and exophilic mosquitoes. This study evaluated the efficacy of MAÏA®, a novel repellent ointment, in laboratory and field conditions in Burkina Faso. Methods For laboratory and field assessment, 20 volunteers were enrolled and trained for nocturnal collection of mosquitoes using human landing catches (HLC). In the laboratory tests, 2 mg/sq cm of treatment (either MAIA® or 20 % DEET) were used to assess median complete protection time (CPT) against two species: Anopheles gambiae and Aedes aegypti, following WHO guidelines. For both species, two strains consisting of susceptible and local strains were used. The susceptible strains were Kisumu and Bora Bora for An. gambiae and Ae. aegypti, respectively. For the field test, the median CPT of MAÏA® was compared to that of a negative (70 % ethanol) and positive (20 % DEET) after carrying out HLCs in rural Burkina Faso in both indoor and outdoor settings. Results Laboratory tests showed median Kaplan-Meier CPT of 6 h 30 min for An. gambiae (Kisumu), 5 h 30 min for An. gambiae (Goden, local strain), and 4 h for Ae. aegypti for both the local and sensitive strain. These laboratory results suggest that MAÏA® is a good repellent against the three mosquito species. During these field tests, a total of 3979 mosquitoes were caught. In this population, anophelines represented 98.5 %, with culicines (Aedes) making up the remaining 1.5 %. Among anopheline mosquitoes, 95 % belonged to the An. gambiae complex, followed by Anopheles funestus and Anopheles pharoensis. The median CPT of 20 % DEET and MAÏA® were similar (8 h) and much longer than that of the negative control (2 h). Conclusions Results from the present studies showed that MAÏA® offers high protection against anophelines biting indoors and outdoors and could play an important role in malaria prevention in Africa.

Download Full-text

The dominant malaria vector, Anopheles funestus from rural south-eastern Tanzania, is more strongly resistant to insecticides than Anopheles arabiensis

10.21203/rs.3.rs-19762/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Polius Gerazi Pinda ◽

Claudia Eichenberger ◽

Halfan S Ngowo ◽

Dickson S Msaky ◽

Said Abbasi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Malaria Transmission ◽

Pyrethroid Resistance ◽

Mosquito Species ◽

Anopheles Funestus ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Sub Saharan Africa ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

South Eastern ◽

Sub Saharan

Abstract Background: Long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) have greatly reduced malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa, but are threatened by insecticide resistance in dominant malaria vectors. In south-eastern Tanzania, pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles funestus now transmit more than 80% of malaria infections even in villages where the species occurs at far lower densities than other vectors such as Anopheles arabiensis.Methods: To better understand the dominance of An. funestus in these settings and improve options for its control, this study compared intensities of resistance between females of this species and those of An. arabiensis , using WHO assays with 1×, 5× and 10× insecticide doses. Additional tests were done to assess the reversibility of such resistance using synergists. The mosquitoes were collected from villages across two districts in south-eastern Tanzania.Findings: Both species were resistant to the two pyrethroids (permethrin and deltamethrin) and the organochloride (DDT) but susceptible to the organophosphate (pirimiphos-methyl) at standard baseline doses (1×). However, An. funestus as opposed to An. arabiensis was also resistant to the carbamate (bendiocarb) at standard doses (1×). An. funestus showed strong resistance to pyrethroids, surviving the 5× doses and 10× doses except in one village. Pre-exposure to the synergist, piperonyl butoxide (PBO), reversed the pyrethroid-resistance in both An. arabiensis and An. funestus achieving mortalities >98%, except for An. funestus from two villages for which permethrin-associated mortalities exceeded 90% but not 98%.Conclusions : In these communities where An. funestus now dominates malaria transmission, the species also displays much stronger resistance to pyrethroids than its counterpart, An. arabiensis, and can readily survive more classes of insecticides, including carbamates. The resistance to pyrethroids in both mosquito species appears to be mostly metabolic and can be reversed significantly using synergists such as PBO. These findings may explain the continued persistence and dominance of An. funestus despite widespread use of pyrethroid-treated LLINs, and will also inform future choices of interventions to tackle malaria transmission in this area and other similar settings. Such interventions may include PBO-based LLINs or improved IRS with compounds such as organophosphates against which the vectors are still susceptible.

Download Full-text

Preferred resting surfaces of dominant malaria vectors inside different house types in rural south-eastern Tanzania

10.21203/rs.2.18018/v2 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Betwel John Msugupakulya ◽

Emmanuel W. Kaindoa ◽

Halfan S. Ngowo ◽

Japhet M. Kihonda ◽

Najat F. Kahamba ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Anopheles Funestus ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Bed Nets ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Rural South ◽

South Eastern ◽

Malaria Mosquitoes ◽

Common House ◽

Contact Insecticides

Download Full-text

Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus s.s. biting pattern in Dielmo, an area of low level exposure to malaria vectors.

10.21203/rs.3.rs-24165/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Souleymane Doucoure ◽

Omar Thiaw ◽

Amélé N. Wotodjo ◽

Charles Bouganali ◽

Nafissatou Diagne ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Malaria Transmission ◽

Anopheles Funestus ◽

Molecular Techniques ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Bed Nets ◽

Low Level ◽

Biting Rate ◽

Outdoor Biting ◽

Night And Day ◽

Biting Behaviour

Abstract Background: In Dielmo, Senegal, the widespread use of long lasting insecticidal nets has decreased both the incidence of malaria and the density of the anopheles population. However, persistent low-level malaria transmission may hamper efforts to eliminate the disease. Therefore, continuous monitoring of the vector population is needed in order to improve knowledge of anopheles biting behaviour and to readjust control interventions.Methods: In 2015, anopheles were collected every month for a whole year and each specimen was identified using morphological and molecular techniques. The biting pattern of each species was analysed according to night (7pm–7am) and day (7am–11am) periods, the place of biting and the season. The ELISA CSP technique was used to evaluate the entomological inoculation rate (EIR).Results: An. arabiensis and An. funestus s.s. were found to be the main vectors biting human in Dielmo. Overall, the biting rate was low, at 3.84bites per night (bpn) and 1.27 bites per day (bpd), respectively. The EIR was 2.51 and 5.03 infected bites per year during the night and day, respectively. During the night, the An. arabiensis and An. funestus biting rate was 1.81 bpn and 1.71 bpn, respectively (p=0.80). During daylight hours, their aggressiveness decreased to 0.51 bpd and 0.73 bpd for An. arabiensis and An. funestus, respectively (p=0.30). During the night, depending on the seasons, only An. funestus displayed a significant outdoor biting behaviour both in the rainy and dry seasons, while during the day, no specific trend of indoor or outdoor biting was observed, regardless of the season for both vectors.Conclusion: This study highlighted low level anopheles nocturnal and diurnal biting and the associated risk of malaria transmission. It showed also the influence of the season on the indoor and outdoor biting pattern, indicating that the human population could be exposed all year round to a low level of anopheles bites. Control programs should increase awareness of the use of bed-nets throughout the year, particularly shortly after dawn when people are still indoors.

Download Full-text