scholarly journals General Spanish population normative data analysis for the EORTC QLQ-C30 by sex, age, and health condition

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Ignacio Arraras ◽  
Sandra Nolte ◽  
Gregor Liegl ◽  
Matthias Rose ◽  
Ana Manterola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Normative Data ◽  
Population Distribution ◽  
Emotional Functioning ◽  
Health Condition ◽  
Spanish Population ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract Purpose General population normative data for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire facilitates interpretation of data assessed from cancer patients. This study aims to present normative data of the general Spanish population. Methods/patients Data were obtained from a prior larger study collecting EORTC QLQ-C30 norm data across 15 countries. Data were stratified by sex and age groups (18–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69 and > 70 years). Sex and age distribution were weighted according to population distribution statistics. Sex- and age-specific normative values were analysed separately, as were participants with versus those without health conditions. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate the association of each of the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales with the determinants age, sex, sex-by-age interaction term, and health condition. Results In total, 1,165 Spanish individuals participated in the study. Differences were found by sex and age. The largest sex-related differences were seen in fatigue, emotional functioning, and global QOL (Quality of Life), favouring men. The largest age differences were seen in emotional functioning, insomnia, and pain, with middle-aged groups having the worst scores. Those > 60 years old scored better than those < 60 years old on all scales except for physical functioning. Participants with no health conditions scored better in all QLQ-C30 domains. Conclusions The present study highlights differences in HRQOL between specific sex/age strata and especially between people with and without a health condition in the general Spanish population. These factors must be considered when comparing general population HRQOL data with that of cancer patients.

scholarly journals Spanish General Population Normative Data Analysis for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and Relationships Between Sex, Age, and Health Conditions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Ignacio Arraras ◽  
Sandra Nolte ◽  
Gregor Liegl ◽  
Matthias Rose ◽  
Ana Manterola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Normative Data ◽  
Population Distribution ◽  
Emotional Functioning ◽  
Health Condition ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract PurposeGeneral population normative data for the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire facilitates interpretation of data assessed from cancer patients. This study aimed to present normative data of the Spanish general population.Methods/Patients Data were obtained from a prior larger study collecting EORTC QLQ-C30 norm data across 15 countries. Data were stratified by sex and age groups (18–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69 and >70 years). Sex and age distribution were weighted according to population distribution statistics. Sex- and age-specific normative values were analysed separately, as were participants with versus those without health conditions. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate the association of each of the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales with the determinants age, sex, sex-by-age interaction term, and health condition. Results 1165 Spanish individuals participated in the study. Differences were found by sex and age. The largest sex-related differences were seen in fatigue, emotional functioning, and global QoL (Quality of Life), favouring men. Largest age differences were seen in emotional functioning, insomnia, and pain, with middle-aged groups having the worst scores. Those >60 years scored better than those <60 years on all scales except for physical functioning. Participants with no health conditions scored better in all QLQ-C30 domains.ConclusionsThe present study highlights differences in HRQoL between specific sex/age strata and especially between persons with and without a health condition in the Spanish general population. These factors must be considered when comparing general population HRQoL data with that of cancer patients.

scholarly journals Normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30 from the Austrian general population

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Lehmann ◽  
◽  
Johannes M. Giesinger ◽  
Sandra Nolte ◽  
Monika Sztankay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Normative Data ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

scholarly journals Quality of life and project of cancer patients in Colombia, a strategy for the creation of a public policy

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Romero-Prada ◽  
Rafael Chaves ◽  
Maria Victoria Victoria Ocampo ◽  
Duvan Gallo ◽  
Lina Maria Huerfano
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Health Condition ◽  
Health State ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
Patient’S Perception

Abstract Background: The quality of life related to health and the outcomes perceived by cancer patients, is a concept that allows knowing the patient's perception of their health situation and the conditions associated with these. This study is part of the PROCAN strategy, originally devised as response to deficiencies in state policies aimed to assess the health condition of cancer patients and the difficulties which arise while posing multidimensional interventions designed to better a patient’s quality of life. Methods: A cross-sectional study was developed in a representative sample of cancer patients in Colombia, in which the standardized generalized instrument EQ5D3L and a specific instrument called EORTC QLQ-C30 were applied. The characterization data of the population were analyzed by descriptive statistics. Results: The defined scales were applied to 360 patients. The global health state of the EORTC QLQ-C30 was of 66.05, which compared with the control scale EQ5D3L was of 0.70 and with the analog visual scale of 69.79. EORTC QLQ-C30 were applied The emotional and social functions were the most affected. And from a symptoms’ perspective, financial difficulties created the greatest impact (52.8), followed by insomnia and fatigue, all of which were above pain. Conclusions: Therefore, what this study intents to achieve is the promotion of the use of measurements of a cancer patient’s quality of life with the purpose of, in the first place, developing process that would mitigate the damage to the most affected dimensions with the focused pathology, and the development of follow-up actions within the Colombian social security services that would aid the evaluation of proposed strategies after the original assessment of a cancer patient’s quality of life.

scholarly journals Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caterina Calderon ◽  
Pere J. Ferrando ◽  
Urbano Lorenzo-Seva ◽  
Estrella Ferreira ◽  
Eun Mi Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Internal Structure ◽  
Normative Data ◽  
Spanish Version ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to analyze the internal structure of the EORTC QLQ-C30, to examine the validity and normative data for cancer patients. Method Exploratory and Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to explore the scale’s dimensionality and test for strong measurement invariance across sex and tumor site. All the analyses were based on a multicenter cohort of 931 patients who completed the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) and the EORTC QLQ-C30. Results Our findings indicate that the EORTC QLQ-C30 has acceptable psychometric properties and an internal structure that is well accounted for a bifactor model: a general factor that evaluates quality of life and a group factor that would analyze physical health that would be defined by physical function, role function, and fatigue. The result of the multi-group CFA revealed a strong invariance according to sex, tumor, and over time. Reliability of the EORTC exceeding 0.86 and the simple sum of the items of the scale was a good indicator of oncology patients’ quality of life. Both factors correlate closely with depression, anxiety, and psychological distress and are sensitive to change, especially the quality of life, with a significant decrease in the post-test. Conclusion The Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 proved to be a valid, reliable instrument to appraise quality of life in cancer patients. The normative data collected from this study may be useful for the early detection of initial symptoms of deterioration of quality of life in oncology patients.

scholarly journals POS0291 THE IMPACT OF DRUG INDUCED AND OTHER RHEUMATIC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS (MD) ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE (QOL) OF CANCER PATIENTS RECEIVED ANTICANCER DRUG TREATMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 371.1-371
Author(s):  
A. Koltakova ◽  
A. Lila ◽  
L. P. Ananyeva ◽  
A. Fedenko
Keyword(s):  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Anticancer Drug ◽  
Physical Functioning ◽  
Role Functioning ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
The Impact

Background:Pts with cancer may have MD that can be caused by neoplastic/paraneoplastic disease, rheumatic diseases or be induced by anticancer drug treatment. There is no data about MD influence on the QoL of cancer patients. The EORTC QoL questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 is a valid questionnaire designed to assess different aspects (Global health (GH), Functional (FS) and symptoms (SS) scales) that define the QoL of cancer patients [1].Objectives:The objective of the study was to assess the impact of drug induced and other types of MD on the QoL of cancer patients that received anticancer drug treatment by using of EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0.Methods:The sampling of 123 pts (M/F – 40/83; mean age 54.4±12.8) with breast (32,5%), gastrointestinal (17%), ovary (8%), lung (7%) and other cancer was observed by rheumatologist in the oncology outpatient clinic. All pts received anticancer drug treatment: chemotherapy (104 pts), target therapy (16 pts) checkpoint-inhibitors (14 pts), hormone therapy (13 pts) in different combinations. 102(82.9%) of 123pts had MD include arthritis (12 pts), synovitis (5 pts), arthralgia (66 pts), periarthritis (34 pts), osteodynia (13 pts). There were 58 pts (group 1; M/F – 14/44; mean age 52.5±12.2) with anticancer drug treatment induced MD and 44 pts (group 2; M/F – 16/27; mean age 57.6±13.5) with other type of MD include 26 pts with skeletal metastasis. The were 21 pts (group 3; M/F – 10/11; mean age 52.9±11.1) without MD. All pts fulfilled EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 (tab.1).Table 1.The median [Q1;Q3] of results of GH, SS and SS of EORTC QLQ-C30ScaleSubscaleGroup1Group2Group3GH58.3[50;58]58.3[41.7;83.3]50[50;66.7]FS*Physical functioning73.3[60;86.7]73.3[66.7;86.7]86.7[80;93]Role functioning66.7[66.7;100]83.3[50;100]100[83;100]Emotional functioning83.3[66.7;100]75[66.7;91.7]91.6[83.3;100]Social functioning83.3[66.7;100]83.3[50;100]100[83.3;100]SS*Pain33.3[0;50]16.7[0;33.3]0[0;16.7]*There are only the scores that had got a statistical difference between the groups.Kruskal-Wallis H and post-hoc (Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner (DSCF) pairwise comparisons) tests for data analysis were performed.Results:A Kruskal-Wallis H test has shown a statistically significant difference in physical (χ2(2)=7.54; p=0.023), role (χ2(2)=9.87; p=0.007), emotion (χ2(2)=7.69; p=0.021) functioning and pain (χ2(2)=8.44; p=0.015) scores between the different groups. A post-hoc test with DSCF pairwise comparisons of median has shown a statistically significant difference between 1 and 3 groups (W=3.904; p=0.016) for physical functioning, between 2 and 3 groups (W=3.35; p=0.004) for role functioning, between 2 and 3 groups (W=4.03; p=0.012) for emotional functioning, between 1 and 3 groups (W=-3.97; p=0.014) for pain scale.Conclusion:The study has shown that MD associated with anticancer drug treatment adversely affected the QoL of cancer patients received anticancer drug treatment by reducing a physical functioning and by increasing pain scores. Presence of other types of MD adversely affect the QoL by reducing emotional and role functioning.References:[1]Aaronson NK,et al.The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst.1993;85(5):365-376. doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365Disclosure of Interests:None declared

United States Utility Algorithm for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multiattribute Utility Instrument Based on a Cancer-Specific Quality-of-Life Instrument

2021 ◽  
pp. 0272989X2110035
Author(s):  
Dennis A. Revicki ◽  
Madeleine T. King ◽  
Rosalie Viney ◽  
A. Simon Pickard ◽  
Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
United States ◽  
Emotional Functioning ◽  
Health State ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Multiattribute Utility ◽  
Value Set ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Background The EORTC QLU-C10D is a multiattribute utility measure derived from the cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire, the EORTC QLQ-C30. The QLU-C10D contains 10 dimensions (physical, role, social and emotional functioning, pain, fatigue, sleep, appetite, nausea, bowel problems). The objective of this study was to develop a United States value set for the QLU-C10D. Methods A US online panel was quota recruited to achieve a representative sample for sex, age (≥18 y), race, and ethnicity. Respondents undertook a discrete choice experiment, each completing 16 choice-pairs, randomly assigned from a total of 960 choice-pairs. Each pair included 2 QLU-C10D health states and duration. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression, parameterized to fit the quality-adjusted life-year framework. Utility weights were calculated as the ratio of each dimension-level coefficient to the coefficient for life expectancy. Results A total of 2480 panel members opted in, 2333 (94%) completed at least 1 choice-pair, and 2273 (92%) completed all choice-pairs. Within dimensions, weights were generally monotonic. Physical functioning, role functioning, and pain were associated with the largest utility weights. Cancer-specific dimensions, such as nausea and bowel problems, were associated with moderate utility decrements, as were general issues such as problems with emotional functioning and social functioning. Sleep problems and fatigue were associated with smaller utility decrements. The value of the worst health state was 0.032, which was slightly greater than 0 (equivalent to being dead). Conclusions This study provides the US-specific value set for the QLU-C10D. These estimated health state scores, based on responses to the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, can be used to evaluate the cost-utility of oncology treatments.

Predictive factors of overall quality of life in advanced cancer patients using EORTC QLQ-C30

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gemma Cramarossa ◽  
Liang Zeng ◽  
Liying Zhang ◽  
Ling-Ming Tseng ◽  
Ming-Feng Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Understanding the reliability and validity of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Turkish cancer patients

2007 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 071108171341007-??? ◽  
Author(s):  
E.S. CANKURTARAN ◽  
E. OZALP ◽  
H. SOYGUR ◽  
S. OZER ◽  
D.I. AKBIYIK ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Psychometric properties of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire in inpatient cancer rehabilitation in Germany

2004 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
JÖRG DIRMAIER ◽  
SILKE ZAUN ◽  
UWE KOCH ◽  
TIMO HARFST ◽  
HOLGER SCHULZ
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Scale Structure ◽  
Cancer Rehabilitation ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Objective: Recent years have shown an increase in the use of questionnaires measuring health-related quality of life to verify the quality of treatment in the field of oncology. An often used cancer-specific questionnaire is the “Quality of Life Core Questionnaire of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer” (EORTC QLQ-C30). The purpose of this study is to analyze the psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 1) in order to determine the feasibility and appropriateness for its use in inpatient cancer rehabilitation in Germany with heterogeneous diagnoses.Methods: The questionnaire was administrated to a sample of 972 cancer patients at the beginning of treatment and to 892 patients after treatment. Besides descriptive analysis, the statistical analyses include confirmatory analysis and the multitrait/multimethod approach to test the questionnaire's postulated scale structure (factorial validity) and its reliability (internal consistencies). The analysis also includes a comparison of responsiveness indices (effect size, reliable change index) to test the sensitivity of the instrument.Results: The EORTC QLQ-C30 showed satisfactory levels of reliability and sensitivity, but the postulated scale structure could not be confirmed. The results illustrate that the varimax-rotated solution of a principal component analysis does not confirm the scale structure postulated by the authors. Correspondingly, the selected fit indices within the scope of the confirmatory factor analysis do not show satisfactory results either.Significance of results: We therefore consider version 1 of the EORTC QLQ-C30 to be only limitedly useful for the routine assessment of changes in the quality of life of cancer patients in inpatient rehabilitation in Germany, especially because of the instrument's length and possible redundancies. For this reason, a scoring procedure limited to a subset of items is suggested, revealing satisfactory to good psychometric indices. However, further psychometric tests are necessary, especially with regard to validity and sensitivity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document