scholarly journals Where is critical analysis of power and positionality in knowledge translation?

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chloe Crosschild ◽  
Ngoc Huynh ◽  
Ismalia De Sousa ◽  
Eunice Bawafaa ◽  
Helen Brown

AbstractIn Canada, the Eurocentric epistemological foundations of knowledge translation (KT) approaches and practices have been significantly influenced by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) KT definition. More recently, integrated knowledge translation (IKT) has emerged in part as epistemic resistance to Eurocentric discourse to critically analyse power relations between researcher and participants. Yet, despite the proliferation of IKT literature, issues of power in research relationships and strategies to equalize relationships remain largely unaddressed. In this paper, we analyse the gaps in current IKT theorizing against the backdrop of the CIHR KT definition by drawing on critical scholars, specifically those writing about standpoint theory and critical reflexivity, to advance IKT practice that worked to surface and change research-based power dynamics within the context of health research systems and policy.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela A Juma ◽  
Catherine M Jones ◽  
Rhona Mijumbi-Dave ◽  
Clare Wenham ◽  
Tiny Masupe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Health research governance is an essential function of national health research systems. Yet many African countries have not developed strong health research governance structures and processes. This paper presents a comparative analysis of national health research governance in Botswana, Kenya, Uganda, and Zambia where health sciences research production is well established relative to some others in the region, and continues to grow. It aims to examine progress made and challenges faced in strengthening health research governance in these countries.Methods: We collected data through document review and key informant interviews with a total of 80 participants including decision-makers, researchers, and funders across stakeholder institutions in the four countries. Data on health research governance were thematically coded for policies, legislation, regulation, and institutions and analyzed comparatively across the four national health research systems.Results: All countries were found to be moving from using a research governance framework set by national science, technology and innovation policies to one that is more anchored in health research structures and policies within the health sectors. Kenya and Zambia have adopted health research legislation and policies, while Botswana and Uganda are in the process of developing the same. National level health research coordination and regulation is still hampered by inadequate financial and human resource capacities, which present a challenge for building strong health research governance institutions.Conclusion: Building health research governance as a key pillar of national health research systems involve developing stronger governance institutions, strengthening health research legislation, increasing financing for governance processes, and improving human resource capacity in health research governance and management.


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle L Redman-MacLaren ◽  
David J MacLaren ◽  
Janella Solomon ◽  
Alwin Muse ◽  
Rowena Asugeni ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. E5-6
Author(s):  
Bev J. Holmes ◽  
Alex MacKenzie ◽  
Bruce McManus ◽  
Aubie Angel Angel

Professor Sir Mark Walport, FRS, FMed Sci, FRCP, physicianscientist, academic leader and visionary health research planner, was the recipient of the 2020 Henry G. Friesen International Prize in Health Research. He is a former Chief Executive, UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) and UK government’s Chief Scientific Advisor. He continues to be a champion of fundamental science in health research, engineering, technology and innovation, and is a major spokesperson on COVID-19 pandemic trends at the global level.


2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ritu Sadana ◽  
Tikki Pang

This article introduces the WHO health research system analysis (HRSA) initiative as an input to the World Health Report 2004 on health research, "Knowledge for Better Health". Section 2 presents the HRSA conceptual framework for operational description and analysis of national health research from a system rather than sector perspective. Section 3 summarizes research projects addressing contemporary cross-national issues, aiming to: provide answers to key questions, further explore contested areas within systems, and improve decision-making on research investment options. Section 4 summarizes the comprehensive country studies on research systems. Section 5 outlines a pilot study on methods for 18 comprehensive country studies, including Brazil, Chile, and Costa Rica. Section 6 concludes that the pilot study and eventual main phase to describe and analyze national health research systems will demonstrate WHO's commitment to strengthening capacity in partnership with countries.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Alice Miller ◽  
Sarah J. Patton ◽  
Mark Dobrow ◽  
Whitney Berta

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joses Muthuri Kirigia ◽  
Martin Okechukwu Ota ◽  
Flavia Senkubuge ◽  
Charles Shey Wiysonge ◽  
Bongani M. Mayosi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document