scholarly journals Congenital aortic stenosis due to unicuspid unicommissural aortic valve: a case report

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnar B. Ingason ◽  
Gunnlaugur Sigfusson ◽  
Bjarni Torfason
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Congenital Aortic Stenosis

The Ross-Konno Procedure as Reoperative Treatment in a Young Adult with Congenital Aortic Stenosis

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 182
Author(s):  
Fotios A. Mitropoulos ◽  
Meletios A. Kanakis ◽  
Sotiria C. Apostolopoulou ◽  
Spyridon Rammos ◽  
Constantine E. Anagnostopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Young Adult ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Uneventful Recovery ◽  
Ross Procedure ◽  
Congenital Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Biological Prostheses

<p>Mechanical and biological prostheses are valid options when aortic valve replacement is necessary. The Ross procedure is also an alternative solution, especially for young patients.</p><p>We describe the case of a young patient with congenital aortic stenosis and bicuspid aortic valve who presented with dyspnea on exertion. An open commissurotomy was performed, and within 8 months the patient developed recurrent symptoms of severe aortic stenosis. He underwent redo sternotomy and a Ross-Konno procedure with an uneventful recovery.</p>

Abstract 19440: Reintervention Rates Following Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty versus Surgical Valve Repair in Isolated Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis - A Meta-analysis

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
May T Saung ◽  
Courtney McCracken ◽  
Ritu Sachdeva ◽  
Christopher J Petit
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Stenosis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty ◽  
Congenital Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Primary Indication ◽  
Aortic Valvuloplasty

Introduction: The optimal treatment for congenital aortic stenosis (AS) is debated despite decades of experience with both balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) and surgical aortic valve repair (SAV). While BAV has been the mainstay of therapy for AS, recent single-center reports suggest optimal results following SAV. Hypothesis: We propose that reintervention rates following SAV and BAV are equivalent. Methods: We queried Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science for eligible studies using the keywords: “congenital aortic stenosis”, “balloon valvotomy”, “aortic valve stenosis surgery” and “treatment outcome or reintervention”. Studies were excluded when cohort size was <20 pts, when follow-up was < 2.5 yrs from primary intervention, and when primary indication was not AS (e.g. SAV in the setting of aortic valve regurgitation (AR)). Outcomes analyzed included death, reintervention and moderate or severe AR. Analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis v3 using random effects models. Results: A total of 20 studies were included in our meta-analysis: SAV alone (n=3), BAV alone (n=12), and both (n=5). The mean age at BAV was 3.1 years (range, 4 days - 7 years) with a mean follow-up duration of 6.8 years, while mean age at SAV was 2.8 years (range, 14.2 days - 7.1 years) with a mean follow-up duration of 9.1 years. Mortality rates following BAV and SAV were 12.3% (95% CI: 7.7 - 19.1) and 10.2% (95% CI: 7.0 - 14.5), respectively (p=0.27). Reintervention following initial procedure for treatment of AS was higher following BAV (35.7% [95% CI: 29 - 43.1]) compared to SAV (25.2% [95% CI: 19.9 - 31.3])(p=0.012). Long-term and mid-term follow-up in these studies showed moderate to severe AR was present in 24.1% and 28.1% of BAV and SAV patients, respectively. Conclusions: Notwithstanding publication bias, both survival rates and development of late AR following BAV and SAV are similar. However, reintervention rates are significantly higher following BAV compared to SAV.

Echocardiography in Aspergillus Endocarditis

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-253
Author(s):  
Martin B. Kleiman
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Mycotic Aneurysm ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Congenital Aortic Stenosis

In an extensive review1 of endocarditis caused by Aspergillus in children, Barst et al found no cases in which the presence of vegetations was proven by echocardiography. We present the case report of a child in whom the two-dimensional echocardiogram first established the presence of a mycotic aneurysm and associated intracardiac and intra-aortic vegetations. Case Report. An 11-year-old girl with severe congenital aortic stenosis underwent aortic valvulotomy on Dec 17, 1977. Fever developed on the 11th day after surgery and daily spikes to 38.8 C (102 F) continued for the ensuing several weeks.

scholarly journals Novel ‘open-sleeve technique’ for aortic valve plasty in congenital aortic stenosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 660-660
Author(s):  
Masaya Murata ◽  
Keiichi Hirose ◽  
Akio Ikai ◽  
Kisaburo Sakamoto
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Congenital Aortic Stenosis

Reconstruction of a Previously Repaired Aortic Valve Destroyed by Infective Endocarditis: Case Report

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 408-410
Author(s):  
Tomas Chalela ◽  
Viktor Hraska
Keyword(s):  
Congenital Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Congenital Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
History Of ◽  
Uncommon Condition

Infective endocarditis (IE) is an uncommon condition among patients with congenital heart disease, however it can be life threatening. The usual management includes replacement of the affected valve, especially in patients with aortic valve compromise, and is even more common in previously repaired valves. In this case report, we describe the successful reconstruction of an aortic root destroyed by IE, in a patient with history of ballooning of a congenital aortic stenosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document