scholarly journals Comparison of postoperative complications between segmentectomy and lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery: a multicenter study

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoît Bédat ◽  
Etienne Abdelnour-Berchtold ◽  
Thomas Perneger ◽  
Marc-Joseph Licker ◽  
Alexandra Stefani ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Compared to lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), segmentectomy by VATS has a potential higher risk of postoperative atelectasis and air leakage. We compared postoperative complications between these two procedures, and analyzed their risk factors. Methods We reviewed the records of all patients who underwent anatomical pulmonary resections by VATS from January 2014 to March 2018 in two Swiss university hospitals. All complications were reported. A logistic regression model was used to compare the risks of complications for the two interventions. Adjustment for patient characteristics was performed using a propensity score, and by including risk factors separately. Results Among 690 patients reviewed, the major indication for lung resection was primary lung cancer (86.4%) followed by metastasis resection (5.8%), benign lesion (3.9%), infection (3.2%) and emphysema (0.7%). Postoperatively, there were 80 instances (33.3%) of complications in 240 segmentectomies, and 171 instances (38.0%) of complications in 450 lobectomies (P = 0.73). After adjustment for the patient’s propensity to be treated by segmentectomy rather than lobectomy, the risks of a complication remained comparable for the two techniques (odds ratio for segmentectomy 0.91 (0.61–1.30), p = 0.59). Length of hospital stay and drainage duration were shorter after segmentectomy. On multivariate analysis, an American Society of Anesthesiologists score above 2 and a forced expiratory volume in one second below 80% of predicted value were significantly associated with the occurrence of complications. Conclusions The rate of complications and their grade were similar between segmentectomy and lobectomy by VATS.

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-63
Author(s):  
Joseph Seitlinger ◽  
Anne Olland ◽  
Sophie Guinard ◽  
Gilbert Massard ◽  
Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz

Abstract OBJECTIVES Since video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) was first performed in the early 1990s, there have been many developments, and the conversion rate has decreased over the years. This article highlights the specific outcomes of patients undergoing conversion to thoracotomy despite initially scheduled VATS lung resection. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 501 patients who underwent thoracoscopic anatomic lung resection (i.e. lobectomy, segmentectomy or bilobectomy) between 1 January 2012 and 1 August 2017 at our institution. We explored the risk factors for surgical conversion and adverse events occurring in patients who underwent conversion to thoracotomy. RESULTS A total of 44/501 patients underwent conversion during the procedure (global rate: 8.8%). The main reasons for conversion were (i) anatomical variation, adhesions or unexpected tumour extension (37%), followed by (ii) vascular causes (30%) and (iii) unexpected lymph node invasion (20%). The least common reason for conversion was technical failure (13%). We could not identify any specific risk factors for conversion. The global complication rate was significantly higher in converted patients (40.9%) than in complete VATS patients (16.8%) (P = 0.001). Postoperative atrial fibrillation was a major complication in converted patients (18.2%) [odds ratio (OR) 5.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80–13.27; P = 0.001]. Perioperative mortality was higher in the conversion group (6.8%) than in the VATS group (0.2%) (OR 33.3, 95% CI 3.4–328; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Through the years, the global conversion rate has dramatically decreased to <10%. Nevertheless, patients who undergo conversion represent a high-risk population in terms of complications (40.9% vs 16.8%) and perioperative mortality (6.8% vs 0.2%).


Surgery Today ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Koizumi ◽  
Shigeo Tanaka ◽  
Shuji Haraguchi ◽  
Hirohiko Akiyama ◽  
Iwao Mikami ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 335
Author(s):  
M Yamamoto ◽  
S Sugiyama ◽  
S Koyama ◽  
K Mino ◽  
T Ikeya ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 863-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Yang ◽  
Yan Xia ◽  
Yang Yang ◽  
Zheng-zheng Ni ◽  
Wen-xin He ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document