scholarly journals Retrospective analysis of incidental non-trauma associated findings in severely injured patients identified by whole-body spiral CT scans

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes KM Fakler ◽  
Orkun Özkurtul ◽  
Christoph Josten
Injury ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 1964-1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Mezidi ◽  
Mehdi Ould-Chikh ◽  
Pauline Deras ◽  
Camille Maury ◽  
Orianne Martinez ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e68880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Huber-Wagner ◽  
Peter Biberthaler ◽  
Sandra Häberle ◽  
Matthias Wierer ◽  
Martin Dobritz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Wirth ◽  
Julian Hebebrand ◽  
Raffaella Basilico ◽  
Ferco H. Berger ◽  
Ana Blanco ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although some national recommendations for the role of radiology in a polytrauma service exist, there are no European guidelines to date. Additionally, for many interdisciplinary guidelines, radiology tends to be under-represented. These factors motivated the European Society of Emergency Radiology (ESER) to develop radiologically-centred polytrauma guidelines. Results Evidence-based decisions were made on 68 individual aspects of polytrauma imaging at two ESER consensus conferences. For severely injured patients, whole-body CT (WBCT) has been shown to significantly reduce mortality when compared to targeted, selective CT. However, this advantage must be balanced against the radiation risk of performing more WBCTs, especially in less severely injured patients. For this reason, we recommend a second lower dose WBCT protocol as an alternative in certain clinical scenarios. The ESER Guideline on Radiological Polytrauma Imaging and Service is published in two versions: a full version (download from the ESER homepage, https://www.eser-society.org) and a short version also covering all recommendations (this article). Conclusions Once a patient has been accurately classified as polytrauma, each institution should be able to choose from at least two WBCT protocols. One protocol should be optimised regarding time and precision, and is already used by most institutions (variant A). The second protocol should be dose reduced and used for clinically stable and oriented patients who nonetheless require a CT because the history suggests possible serious injury (variant B). Reading, interpretation and communication of the report should be structured clinically following the ABCDE format, i.e. diagnose first what kills first.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-22
Author(s):  
Hyun-Woo Sun ◽  
Suk-Kyung Hong ◽  
Min-Ae Keum ◽  
Jong-Kwan Baek ◽  
Jung-Sun Lee ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Huber-Wagner ◽  
Karl-Georg Kanz ◽  
Marc Hanschen ◽  
Martijn van Griensven ◽  
Peter Biberthaler ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Falco Hietbrink ◽  
Roderick M. Houwert ◽  
Karlijn J. P. van Wessem ◽  
Rogier K. J. Simmermacher ◽  
Geertje A. M. Govaert ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In 1999 an inclusive trauma system was initiated in the Netherlands and a nationwide trauma registry, including all admitted trauma patients to every hospital, was started. The Dutch trauma system is run by trauma surgeons who treat both the truncal (visceral) and extremity injuries (fractures). Materials and Methods In this comprehensive review based on previous published studies, data over the past 20 years from the central region of the Netherlands (Utrecht) was evaluated. Results It is demonstrated that the initiation of the trauma systems and the governance by the trauma surgeons led to a region-wide mortality reduction of 50% and a mortality reduction for the most severely injured of 75% in the level 1 trauma centre. Furthermore, major improvements were found in terms of efficiency, demonstrating the quality of the current system and its constructs such as the type of surgeon. Due to the major reduction in mortality over the past few years, the emphasis of trauma care evaluation shifts towards functional outcome of severely injured patients. For the upcoming years, centralisation of severely injured patients should also aim at the balance between skills in primary resuscitation and surgical stabilization versus longitudinal surgical involvement. Conclusion Further centralisation to a limited number of level 1 trauma centres in the Netherlands is necessary to consolidate experience and knowledge for the trauma surgeon. The future trauma surgeon, as specialist for injured patients, should be able to provide the vast majority of trauma care in this system. For the remaining part, intramural, regional and national collaboration is essential


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document