scholarly journals Comprehensive analysis of mutations and clonal evolution patterns in a cohort of patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuslina Mat Yusoff ◽  
Fadly Ahid ◽  
Zahidah Abu Seman ◽  
Julia Abdullah ◽  
Nor Rizan Kamaluddin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with the acquisition of additional somatic mutations which are thought to drive phenotypic adaptability, clonal selection and evolution of leukemic clones during treatment. We performed high throughput exome sequencing of matched presentation and relapsed samples from 6 cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML) patients treated with standard remission induction chemotherapy in order to contribute with the investigation of the mutational landscape of CN-AML and clonal evolution during AML treatment. Result A total of 24 and 32 somatic variants were identified in presentation and relapse samples respectively with an average of 4.0 variants per patient at presentation and 5.3 variants per patient at relapse, with SNVs being more frequent than indels at both disease stages. All patients have somatic variants in at least one gene that is frequently mutated in AML at both disease presentation and relapse, with most of these variants are classic AML and recurrent hotspot mutations including NPM1 p.W288fs, FLT3-ITD, NRAS p.G12D and IDH2 p.R140Q. In addition, we found two distinct clonal evolution patterns of relapse: (1) a leukemic clone at disease presentation acquires additional mutations and evolves into the relapse clone after the chemotherapy; (2) a leukemic clone at disease presentation persists at relapse without the addition of novel somatic mutations. Conclusions The findings of this study suggest that the relapse-initiating clones may pre-exist prior to therapy, which harbor or acquire mutations that confer selective advantage during chemotherapy, resulting in clonal expansion and eventually leading to relapse.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuslina Mat Yusoff ◽  
Fadly Ahid ◽  
Zahidah Abu Seman ◽  
Julia Abdullah ◽  
Nor Rizan Kamaluddin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with the acquisition of additional somatic mutations which are thought to drive phenotypic adaptability driving clonal selection during treatment and evolution of leukemic clones. We performed high throughput exome sequencing of matched presentation and relapsed samples from 6 cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML) patients treated with standard remission induction chemotherapy in order to investigate the mutational landscape of CN-AML and clonal evolution during AML treatment. Result A total of 24 and 32 somatic variants were identified in presentation and relapse samples respectively with an average of 4.0 variants per patient at presentation and 5.3 variants per patient at relapse, with SNVs were more frequent than indels at both disease stages. All patients have somatic variants in at least one gene that frequently mutated in AML at both disease presentation and relapse, with most of these variants are classic AML and recurrent hotspot mutations including NPM1 p.W288fs, FLT3-ITD, NRAS p.G12D and IDH2 p.R140Q. In addition, we found two clonal evolution patterns of relapse: (1) a leukemic clone at disease presentation acquires additional mutations and evolves into the relapse clone after the chemotherapy; (2) a leukemic clone at disease presentation persists at relapse without the addition of novel somatic mutations. Conclusion The findings from this study suggest that the relapse-initiating clones may pre-exist before therapy, which harbor or acquire mutations that confer selective advantage during chemotherapy, resulting in clonal expansion and eventually leading to relapse.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1014-1014
Author(s):  
Hélène Boutroux ◽  
Pierre Hirsch ◽  
Chrystele Bilhou-Nabera ◽  
Ruoping Tang ◽  
Fanny Fava ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive malignancy caused by the accumulation of multiple oncogenetic mutations occurring in a single lineage of hematopoietic progenitors. AML is rare in children and the mutations found are partially different from those in adults, and for some with a lower frequency. Thus, clonal evolution leading to pediatric AML may be specific, and has not been described yet. Methods To define clonal evolution from diagnosis to relapse, we performed whole exome sequencing in matched trio of specimens (diagnosis, germline and relapse) in a 9-years old girl presenting AML FAB M5a with t(9;11)(p22;q23) MLL-AF9 and trisomy 8. At diagnosis, we focused on 3 non-silent somatic mutations candidate for leukemogenesis process, confirmed by Sanger method: EED (R355*), GSDMC (R40*) and ELK1 (3’ UTR). In the same time, we performed cell cultures from bone marrow mononucleated cells at diagnosis. CD34 and CD38 cells were cultured either in liquid long term culture medium (LTC IC) or methylcellulose medium. Results: A total of 512 colonies were collecte. Our 3 interest mutations and trisomy 8 were tracked by allele-specific PCR, and MLL rearrangement detected by FISH, individually in 267 from the 512 colonies. Exploitable results were found in 164 colonies. Through these results in the different cell populations, we were able to establish the clonal architecture at diagnosis. MLL-AF9 fusion and EED mutation were found together as the first concomitant occurring events in the leukemic clone. Then genotyping of the colonies demonstrated that ELK1 mutation, GSDMC mutation, and trisomy 8 were successively acquired. Additional later mutations such as ASXL1 (frameshift), PTPN11 (E76K), EMP2 (3’UTR) and DGCR14 (P314S) were detected in the relapse sample. Discussion The 3 mutations studied in the colonies may impact the progression of the leukemic clone by dysregulating several cellular pathways and networks. First, EED is an essential non-catalytic subunit of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) which mediates gene silencing through catalysis of histone H3K27 methylation. PRC2 is known to be enhanced in solid neoplasms such as prostate cancer. On the contrary, in myeloid malignancies and myelodysplasic syndromes, it has been recently demonstrated that mutations involving PRC2 subunits (EED, SUZ12 and EZH1/2) were hypomorphic. These loss-of-functions mutations were responsible for chromatin relaxation and induced transcription of genes promoting self-renewal such as HOXA9. Nevertheless, recent sh-RNA studies in a murine model of MLL-AF9 leukemia demonstrated that residual PRC2 enzymatic activity after EED mutation is needed to unable leukemia growth. These data are coherent with our finding that EED mutation is an early event in leukemogenesis, in cooperation with MLL-AF9 rearrangement. Secondly, ELK1 is targeted by RAS-MAPK pathway, thus its mutation can confer an increased proliferation potential when acquired by the leukemic clone, after its maturation has been blocked and its self-renewal increased through previous MLL rearrangement and EED mutation. Finally, GSDMC may be implicated in monocyte count regulation, and mutated in other neoplasms such as melanoma. As a consequence, it is likely that its mutation occurs lately in the evolution of the monoblastic leukemic clone of our patient. The latest event in the clonal evolution in our patient at diagnosis is the acquisition of trisomy 8. Conclusion This study highlights the clonal evolution in one pediatric AML, and paves the way for further studies to better understand clonal evolution in children. Elucidating, the succession and the cooperation between driver and secondary mutations, is important for both understanding leukemogenesis and developing innovative therapeutic agents targeting founding anomalies in the leukemic clone at its most precocious stage. Moreover, discovering clonal architecture also unable to find new minimal residual disease markers to assess the therapeutic response and risk stratification. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 106494
Author(s):  
Diego Adrianzen-Herrera ◽  
Ximena Jordan-Bruno ◽  
Katherine A. Devitt ◽  
Joanna L. Conant ◽  
Juli-Anne Gardner

2012 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eytan M. Stein ◽  
Martin S. Tallman

2018 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 561-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayman Qasrawi ◽  
Waled Bahaj ◽  
Lien Qasrawi ◽  
Omar Abughanimeh ◽  
John Foxworth ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document