scholarly journals Inequities in breast cancer treatment in sub-Saharan Africa: findings from a prospective multi-country observational study

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Milena Foerster ◽  
Benjamin O. Anderson ◽  
Fiona McKenzie ◽  
Moses Galukande ◽  
Angelica Anele ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 256-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beverley de Valois ◽  
Teresa E. Young ◽  
Nicola Robinson ◽  
Christine McCourt ◽  
Elizabeth Jane Maher

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18736-e18736
Author(s):  
Jennifer Morgan ◽  
Takondwa Zuze ◽  
Shekinah Nefreteri Cluff Elmore ◽  
Matthew Painschab ◽  
Yolanda Gondwe ◽  
...  

e18736 Background: Despite increasing availability of curative-intent breast cancer treatment in concordance with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Harmonized Guidelines for Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), few descriptions of their application in SSA are available. Our aim was to describe patterns of curative-intent treatment including neoadjuvant (NAC) and/or adjuvant chemotherapy (AdC) and surgery (S) by stage and HIV status, and the association between guideline-concordant treatment completion and overall survival (OS). Methods: We enrolled newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in a prospective cohort study at Kamuzu Central Hospital in Malawi from Dec 2016 – Oct 2018. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were calculated to identify factors associated with completion of guideline-concordant treatment, defined as S and at least 4 cycles of NAC or AdC. A logistic regression model was performed using variables with p<0.1. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan Meier methods and log-rank test. Results: 67 non-metastatic patients were included. 12 (18%) were HIV+; 13 (19%) were Stage II and 54 (81%) Stage III. 46 (69%) began treatment with NAC, of which 39 (85%) were Stage III and 7 (15%) Stage II. 12 (18%) began treatment with S+AdC, of which 5 (42%) were Stage II and 7 (58%) were Stage III. 2 (3%) Stage III patients were treated with palliative chemotherapy (PC). 7 (10%) never received treatment. Overall, 41 (61%) underwent S. In bivariate analysis, factors associated with failure to complete treatment were HIV+ (OR 0.25 CI (0.06-0.99), Stage III (OR 0.10 CI (0.01-0.89) and ER/PR-/HER2+ (OR 0.07 CI (0.01-0.49). In adjusted analysis, ER/PR-/HER2+ (OR 0.12 (0.01-0.97) was associated with failure to complete treatment. HIV+ patients received less NAC than HIV- (2.5 vs 4 cycles; p=0.07) and similar AdC as HIV- (6 vs 6 cycles; p=0.7). Median OS for those who began treatment with NAC was shorter than with S+AdC (28.5 vs 40 months; p=0.01). Median OS for HIV+ vs HIV- who received NAC was 19.7 vs 32.7 months (p=0.10) and received S+AdC was unreached vs 37.1 months (p=0.27). Conclusions: When applying NCCN Harmonized Guidelines for SSA to Malawi, most patients received NAC for curative breast cancer treatment and had significantly shorter OS compared to those receiving upfront S+AdC. Stage III, HIV+, and ER/PR-/HER2+ patients were less likely to complete guideline-concordant treatment which may reflect advanced disease or poor treatment tolerability. Further study is needed to identify barriers to guideline-concordant treatment and inform interventions to improve breast cancer treatment outcomes in Malawi and SSA.[Table: see text]


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 3) ◽  
pp. 49s-49s
Author(s):  
Takondwa Zuze ◽  
Tamiwe Tomoka ◽  
Ruth Nyirenda ◽  
Richard Nyasosela ◽  
Ryan Seguin ◽  
...  

Purpose Despite the increasing breast cancer burden in sub-Saharan Africa, outcomes are suboptimal as a result of limited screening, limited diagnostic infrastructure, advanced stage, and limited treatment availability. In Malawi, we established the first prospective cohort of patients with breast cancer to comprehensively and longitudinally describe breast cancer in this environment. Methods Since December 2016, we have been enrolling patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer at Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi. All patients receive standardized baseline and follow-up evaluations and treatment that is consistent with National Comprehensive Cancer Network harmonized guidelines for sub-Saharan Africa. Results From December 2016 to May 2018, 70 women with breast cancer were enrolled. The median age was 48 years (range, 21 to 78 years) and 16 patients (23%) were HIV positive. Of 63 patients who could be formally staged, 54 (86%) had stage III and IV disease, including 40 (63%) with T4 tumors, 50 (79%) with at least N1, and 19 (30%) with distant metastases. Of 65 tumors histologically graded, 30 (46%) were grade 3 and 22 (34%) were grade 2. Of 66 biopsies evaluated, 31 (47%) were estrogen or progesterone receptor positive. Fifty biopsies were additionally evaluated for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, of which 12 (22%) were positive and 15 (30%) triple negative. Thirty-nine women (56%) received curative-intent treatment, including eight with modified radical mastectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, and 31 with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by modified radical mastectomy for localized bulky disease that was initially felt to be unresectable. Adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy was typically administered as doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide. Twenty-five patients (36%) received palliative-intent chemotherapy, typically with single-agent paclitaxel. Six patients (9%) received no cancer treatment, with two patients dying before chemotherapy and four refusing cancer treatment. Median follow-up time was 7.8 months and overall survival was 88% at 12 months (95% CI, 76% to 96%) with no significant differences between HIV-positive and HIV-negative women ( P = .198). Conclusion Women at a national teaching hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi, presented with young age and advanced, bulky, high-risk breast cancer, but short-term survival was good in the context of a structured treatment program. Continued improvements for this population are needed for all aspects of the care cascade, including early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliation, to improve outcomes further. AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/site/ifc . No COIs from the authors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document