scholarly journals Effective chemotherapy and targeted therapy supplemented with stereotactic radiotherapy of a patient with metastatic colon cancer following renal transplantation: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Szabolcs Bellyei ◽  
Árpád Boronkai ◽  
Eva Pozsgai ◽  
Dávid Fodor ◽  
László Mangel

Abstract Background Previous studies have shown that patients who underwent renal transplantation were at a greater risk of developing malignancies. Due to advances in effective surgical techniques and immunosuppressive therapies, organ recipients live longer. Yet, there is insufficient information about the recommended type of therapy for colorectal cancer patients following transplantation. We describe the oncological treatment of a patient with renal transplantation, who presented with metastatic colon cancer 5 years after transplantation. Case presentation A 66-year-old Caucasian male patient, with hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and renal failure underwent successful kidney transplantation in 2013. In April 2018, the adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon was found, and surgical resection was performed. The histological diagnosis was low-grade adenocarcinoma. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computerized tomography scan showed a 2.5-cm metastasis in the VIIth segment of the liver and a metastatic paraaortical lymph node on the left. The clinical diagnosis was, therefore, metastatic (stage IV) sigmoid colon cancer (AJCC TNM system). The ongoing medications of the patient included immunosuppressive drugs and medication for his cardiovascular comorbidities. In July 2018, palliative cetuximab plus folinic acid–fluorouracil–irinotecan chemotherapeutic treatment was initiated, then cetuximab was substituted for panitumumab because of adverse events. In August 2018, the follow-up positron emission tomography/computerized tomography scan revealed stable disease. Because of side effects, the patient was unwilling to continue with the panitumumab plus folinic acid–fluorouracil–irinotecan treatment regimen. Therefore, the patient received 10× 5 Gy stereotactic body irradiation for his liver metastasis and mono-panitumumab therapy. By January 2019, the positron emission tomography/computerized tomography scan showed regression of the liver metastasis but a progression in the paraaortic lymph node. Therefore, 5× 8 Gy stereotactic irradiation was given to the paraaortic lesion. Meanwhile, the patient received altogether 16 cycles of panitumumab until June 2019, when complete remission was attained. In July 2019, the patient suffered a hemorrhagic stroke, probably due to his cardiovascular comorbidities, and died subsequently. Conclusions Since information is scarce regarding oncological treatment of patients following organ transplantation, data about their oncological treatment is essential. To our knowledge, this is the first case report to describe the successful chemotherapy and targeted therapy supplemented with stereotactic radiotherapy of a posttransplant patient with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 614-614
Author(s):  
Bodil E. Engelmann ◽  
Annika Loft ◽  
Andreas Kjær ◽  
Hans J. Nielsen ◽  
Eric von Benzon ◽  
...  

614 Background: Treatment options for metastatic colon cancer (mCC) are widening. We prospectively evaluated serial 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (PET/CT) and measurements of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases type 1 (TIMP-1), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and urokinase plasminogen activator receptor domain I [uPAR(I)] for early assessment of treatment response in mCC patients. Methods: Thirty-three mCC patients scheduled for first line chemotherapy with capecitabine, oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and bevacizumab participated; 27 were evaluated by PET/CT before treatment, after one and four treatment series. Morphological and metabolic response was independently assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST1.1) and EORTC PET criteria. Plasma TIMP-1, plasma uPAR(I) and serum CEA were determined. Results: Metabolic response after one treatment course predicted the ability of CAPOX and bevacizumab to induce morphological response after four treatment series with a sensitivity of 80 %, specificity of 69 % and an Odds Ratio of 13.9 [CI 1.9; 182]. Early metabolically stable or progressive disease was associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.2 [CI 1.3; 7.8]). Biomarker levels at early evaluation were associated to shorter PFS (TIMP-1 per unit increase on a log-2 transformed ng/mL scale: HR = 2.23 [CI 1.20; 4.14]; uPAR(I) per 25 fmol/mL increase: HR = 1.36 [CI 1.03; 1.79]). Conclusions: This monocentric study demonstrated predictive value of early metabolic PET response and prognostic value of TIMP-1 and uPAR(I) levels in mCC treated with CAPOX and bevacizumab. Results support investigation of PET/CT, TIMP-1 and uPAR(I) guided early treatment adaptation in mCC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document