scholarly journals Quantitative evaluation of interim positron emission tomography in peripheral T-cell lymphoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Kurch ◽  
Ulrich Dührsen ◽  
Andreas Hüttmann ◽  
Thomas W. Georgi ◽  
Osama Sabri ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Interim [18F]fluoro-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography predicts outcome in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). We compared two quantitative evaluation methods. Methods Interim scans from 43 patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative PTCL from the ‘Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Therapy of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas’ trial were re-analyzed by qPET (relating residual lymphoma-related uptake to liver uptake) and ∆SUVmax (relating interim scan to baseline scan). The endpoint was progression-free survival. Results qPET and ∆SUVmax were closely correlated (Pearson’s r = 0.627). Up to the 60th percentile of values ranked by increasing residual activity, the positive predictive value for progression or death increased from 60 to 95%, with stable negative predictive values (NPV) of 60%. Beyond the 60th percentile, the NPV decreased to 40%. qPET ≥ 2 and ∆SUVmax < 50% identified high-risk populations comprising 41.9% and 39.5% of patients, with 3-year progression-free survival rates of 5.6% (95% confidence interval, 0.8–37.3) and 0%, respectively, as compared to 63.7% (47.4–85.8) and 61.3% (45.1–83.3) in low-risk patients. Conclusions qPET and ∆SUVmax identify large fractions of PTCL patients destined to experience treatment failure. qPET may be preferred because it requires a single PET scan, halving the diagnostic effort.

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 746-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cinzia Pellegrini ◽  
Lisa Argnani ◽  
Alessandro Broccoli ◽  
Vittorio Stefoni ◽  
Enrico Derenzini ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4364-4364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho-Young Yhim ◽  
Na-Ri Lee ◽  
Eun-Kee Song ◽  
So Yeon Jeon ◽  
Chang-Yeol Yim ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Interim positron emission tomography (PET) scan has shown to be useful for evaluating response in Hodgkin lymphoma. And, there has been increasing interests in using interim PET for predicting outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, few data are available regarding prognostic value of interim PET in patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Recently, in an attempt to standardize reporting criteria for interim PET, Deauville five-point scale (5-PS), which visually assess the uptake of lesions in comparison with background mediastinal and liver uptakes, were proposed, but this was not investigated in PTCL. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the prognostic role of interim PET, assessed by Deauville 5-PS, in patients with PTCL treated with systemic chemotherapy. Patients and Methods We consecutively enrolled newly diagnosed PTCL patients, treated with systemic chemotherapy (CHOP/CHOP-like or non-anthracycline-based) and had the baseline PET data with ³1 evaluable hypermetabolic lesion between 2006 and 2012 in two Korean institutions. Patients treated with upfront chemoradiotherapy before interim PET scan were excluded. Interim PET scan was performed after 3 cycles of chemotherapy, before 1 week of the next cycle. Interim PET response was visually assessed by 5-PS and four point or higher was regarded as positive. All PET assessment was performed by 2 nuclear medicine specialists at each institution, and the discrepancy of assessment was resolved by the agreement through discussion. Results A total of 35 patients was included in this analysis. The median age was 60 years (range, 31-79) and 26 (74%) were male. Histologic subtypes included were PTCL, not otherwise specified in 10 (29%), extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma in 8 (23%), angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma in 7 (20%), anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ALK negative in 4 (11%), and others in 6 (18%). 22 patients (63%) were presented as advanced stage disease and 9 (26%) had B symptoms. ECOG performance status was ≥ 2 in 7 (20%), serum LDH level was elevated in 16 (46%), and bone marrow was involved in 5 (14%). Thus, 14 patients (40%) were classified as high risk (≥ 2 factors) by the prognostic index for PTCL (PIT). 31 patients (89%) completed planned systemic chemotherapy ± involved-field radiotherapy and 25 (71%) achieved complete response by systemic chemotherapy. 10 patients (29%) underwent consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Using 5-PS, interim PET scan was visually scored as follows; 1 point in 10 patients (29%), 2 in 6 (17%), 3 in 8 (23%), 4 in 7 (20%), and 5 in 4 (11%). Among these, 11 patients (31%) had 4 point or above were considered positive for interim PET scan. With a median follow-up of 43.4 (range, 4.3-89.8) months, progression-free survival (PFS; median, 5.2 vs 38.0 months, respectively; P=0.001) and overall survival (median, 12.6 months vs not reached, respectively; P=0.004) was significantly worse in patients with positive interim PET than those with negative results. In multivariate analysis for PFS, high risk of PIT (HR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.13-11.99) and positive interim PET (HR, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.32-12.23) were independently associated with faster disease progression, whereas consolidation with ASCT was independent prognostic factor for better PFS (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.84). Conclusion Visual assessment of interim PET scan using Deauville 5-PS appears to predict early outcomes of patients with PTCL. Patients with positive interim PET shows highly predictive of extremely poor outcomes. Therefore, our findings suggest further studies regarding early stratification based on interim PET results as a response-adapted treatment strategies in patients with PTCL are needed to improve outcomes. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 1216-1217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Bennani-Baiti ◽  
Siddhartha Yadav ◽  
Lesley Flynt ◽  
Nabila Bennani-Baiti

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1706-1706
Author(s):  
Luis Alberto de Padua Covas Lage ◽  
Marianne Castro Goncalves ◽  
Rodrigo Santucci ◽  
Renata Oliveira Costa ◽  
Debora Levy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) are a biologically and clinically heterogeneous group of rare diseases arising from mature or activated post-thymic T lymphocytes. Correspond to 10% to 15% of lymphoid malignancies with marked geographical variation in incidence. According to the WHO classification they are divided into nodal, extranodal, primary cutaneous and leukemic or disseminated and encompass 18 distinct entities. The nodal group involves the peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), angioimmunoblastic lymphoma (AITL), anaplastic large cell lymphoma ALK positive (ALCL-ALK+) and anaplastic large cell lymphoma ALK negative (ALCL-ALK-). The literature of PTCL is scarce, especially in our country where data of epidemiology, clinical features and outcomes are usually rarely available. So, to better understand PTCL we performed a retrospective study with patients treated in a reference service for cancer treatment in Brazil. Methods: Eight-seven nodal PTCL patients treated with anthracyclne-based regimen (CHOP or, CHOEP) from January 2000 to June 2014 were evaluated retrospectively at the Medicine School of Sao Paulo University, Brazil. All patients lower than 60 years were consolidated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first CR or PR except that with ALCL-ALK+ diagnosis. Refractory and relapsed patients were salvaged with 3-4 cycles of IVAC (Ifosphamide 1.5 g/m2 i.v D1-D5, etoposide 100mg/m2 i.v D1-D5, aracytin 2g/m2 i.v twice a day D1-D2) regimen and submitted to ASCT. It was performed a central histopathological review and clinical and epidemiological data were obtained from medical records. Patients were evaluated for overall response (OR) including complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Statistical analysis was performed using the STATA-3 program using and a p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 87 patients, 34 (39.08%) cases were classified as ALCL-ALK-, 27 (31.03%) as PTCL-NOS, 16 (18.39%) as ALCL-ALK+, 6 (6.89%) as AITL and in 4 (4.1%) cases the diagnosis could not be performed and an expansion of the immunohistochemical is ongoing. Thirty-six (45.38%) cases were female and 51(54.62%) were male, 59(67.81%) patients were lower than 60 years. Seventy-six (87.35%) patients presented in advanced stage (III or IV) at diagnosis but 73(83.90%) patients presented an ECOG < 2 and 14(16.10%) ≥ 2. Eighteen (20.70%) patients were of low-risk, 26 (29.88%) of low-intermediate risk and 43(49.42%) of high-intermediate and high-risk of international prognostic index (IPI). The CR and PR was obtained for 44(50.57%) and 8(9.19%), respectively with 59.76% OR. Thirty (34.48%) patients were primary refractory and five remain under treatment. In a median of follow of 30 months, ALCL-ALK+ show higher OS (median 140.98 months) than ALCL-ALK- (44.20 months), PTCL-NOS (median 20.62 months) and AITL (median 7.24 months) (p=0.41) (Figure 1A). The median of PFS was 3.84 months for AITL, 23.44 months for ALCL-ALK+, 40.03 months for PTCL-NOS and was not yet reached for ALCL-ALK- (p=0.0006) (Figure 1B). Figure 1: Overall survival (1A) and Progression Free Survival (1B) of nodal PTCL Figure 1:. Overall survival (1A) and Progression Free Survival (1B) of nodal PTCL Figure 2 Figure 2. Conclusion: In this study we showed that ALCL-ALK+ as well as found in the literature presented a better OS in comparison to others nodal T-cell lymphoma as AITL, PTCL-NOS and ALCL-ALK-. Surprisingly the PFS of ALCL-ALK+ was statistically significant lower than of ALCL-ALK-. We thought that this result may be explained because in our service until to perform this analysis we did not indicate ASCT in first CR for ALCL-ALK+, but for all ALCL-ALK-. This hypothesis may be reinforced as the most of our cases presented high-intermediate and high-risk of IPI and that could equalize the favorable effect of ALK expression. In addition, we changed our approach and we are also indicating ASCT in first line for patients with ALCL-ALK+ with intermediate-high and high-risk of IPI . Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 406-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor R. Rodriguez ◽  
Aparna Joshi ◽  
Fangyu Peng ◽  
Raja M. Rabah ◽  
Paul T. Stockmann ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2482-2482
Author(s):  
Haiyan Yang ◽  
Cong Li

Abstract Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous disease with poor prognosis. The response rate of standard CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) is only 50-60%, with a poor long-term survival rate of 10-30%. The addition of etoposide to CHOP increases response rate, but not progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Recent study reported that nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway plays a critical role in PTCL. Bortezomib, a potent and reversible proteasome inhibitor, can induce tumor cell apoptosis by inhibiting activation of NF-κB pathway and has been recommended as single agent option in relapse/refractory PTCL. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of bortezomib in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and prednisone (BCHEP) in newly diagnosed PTCL patients for the first time. METHODS: A prospective, single arm, phase 2 study was conducted (NCT04061772). This is an interim analysis. Patients with newly diagnosis of PTCL were treated with up to 6 cycles of BCHEP regimen every 3 weeks. Bortezomib was subcutaneously administered on Days 1 and 8 at a dose of 1.3 mg/m 2 in combination with CHEP, consisting of 100 mg/m 2 etoposide on Days 1 to 3, 750mg/m 2 cyclophosphamide on Day 1, 75mg/m 2 epirubicin on Day 1 and 100mg prednisone on Days 1 to 5. The primary endpoint of the study was ORR including complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). The secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Between February 2019 and January 2021, a total of twenty-six patients were enrolled. Median age was 57 years (range 37-69) and six (23.1%) were female. Pathological subtypes included ALK-positive anaplastic cell lymphoma (ALCL, n=2), ALK-negative ALCL (n=4), PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS, n=9) and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, n=11). Nineteen patients had stage III/IV disease and eleven had B symptoms, including weight loss in three cases and fever in eight. Ten patients had elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), eleven had IPI score higher than 2. All patients had completed BCHEP treatment for at least two cycles and received imaging evaluation. Ten patients received prophylaxis of intrathecal chemotherapy with methotrexate at least once. Three patients received consolidated radiotherapy for metabolic residuals after chemotherapy, while one received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as consolidation treatment. This study had reached the primary end point at this interim analysis. The ORR was 92.3% (24/26) with a CR rate of 57.7% (15/26). Two patients had progression of disease within two cycles of chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 16.3 months, twelve patients had disease progression, and six died. Median PFS was 10.9 months and 1-year PFS rate was 65.4%. Median OS was 14.6 months and 1-year OS rate was 88.5%. No patient presented with Grade 5 AE. The most frequent all-grade hematological toxicity was leucopenia (42.3%,11/26), anemia (50%,13/26) and thrombocytopenia (23.1%, 6/26). Other common toxicity included intestinal infection or pneumonia (19.2%, 5/26), Grade 1 peripheral neuropathy (15.4%, 4/26) and nausea (7.7%, 2/26). Dose reduction was performed in eight patients. CONCLUSIONS: Interim results showed that bortezomib in combination with CHEP is associated with high response rate and manageable toxicity in patients with previously untreated PTCL. The BCHEP regimen may serve as a novel first-line treatment option for patients with PTCL. The study is going on to enroll patients and updating results, including the prognostic value of serum inflammatory factors. Larger trials will be necessary to further verify the efficacy of this regimen in treatment naïve PTCL patients and to overcome relapse after remission. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document