scholarly journals When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina Sailer ◽  
Stefan Coassin ◽  
Katharina Lackner ◽  
Caroline Fischer ◽  
Eileen McNeill ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Genome editing in mice using either classical approaches like homologous recombination or CRISPR/Cas9 has been reported to harbor off target effects (insertion/deletion, frame shifts or gene segment duplications) that lead to mutations not only in close proximity to the target site but also outside. Only the genomes of few engineered mouse strains have been sequenced. Since the role of the ether-lipid cleaving enzyme alkylglycerol monooxygenase (AGMO) in physiology and pathophysiology remains enigmatic, we created a knockout mouse model for AGMO using EUCOMM stem cells but unforeseen genotyping issues that did not agree with Mendelian distribution and enzyme activity data prompted an in-depth genomic validation of the mouse model. Results We report a gene segment tandem duplication event that occurred during the generation of an Agmo knockout-first allele by homologous recombination. Only low homology was seen between the breakpoints. While a single copy of the recombinant 18 kb cassette was integrated correctly around exon 2 of the Agmo gene, whole genome nanopore sequencing revealed a 94 kb duplication in the Agmo locus that contains Agmo wild-type exons 1–3. The duplication fooled genotyping by routine PCR, but could be resolved using qPCR-based genotyping, targeted locus amplification sequencing and nanopore sequencing. Despite this event, this Agmo knockout mouse model lacks AGMO enzyme activity and can therefore be used to study its physiological role. Conclusions A duplication event occurred at the exact locus of the homologous recombination and was not detected by conventional quality control filters such as FISH or long-range PCR over the recombination sites. Nanopore sequencing provides a cost convenient method to detect such underrated off-target effects, suggesting its use for additional quality assessment of gene editing in mice and also other model organisms.

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 406-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy H T Cheng ◽  
Kathy O Lui ◽  
Xianlu Laura Peng ◽  
Suk Hang Cheng ◽  
Peiyong Jiang ◽  
...  

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1372
Author(s):  
Tengrui Shi ◽  
Jianxi Song ◽  
Guanying You ◽  
Yujie Yang ◽  
Qiong Liu ◽  
...  

MsrB1 used to be named selenoprotein R, for it was first identified as a selenocysteine containing protein by searching for the selenocysteine insert sequence (SECIS) in the human genome. Later, it was found that MsrB1 is homologous to PilB in Neisseria gonorrhoeae, which is a methionine sulfoxide reductase (Msr), specifically reducing L-methionine sulfoxide (L-Met-O) in proteins. In humans and mice, four members constitute the Msr family, which are MsrA, MsrB1, MsrB2, and MsrB3. MsrA can reduce free or protein-containing L-Met-O (S), whereas MsrBs can only function on the L-Met-O (R) epimer in proteins. Though there are isomerases existent that could transfer L-Met-O (S) to L-Met-O (R) and vice-versa, the loss of Msr individually results in different phenotypes in mice models. These observations indicate that the function of one Msr cannot be totally complemented by another. Among the mammalian Msrs, MsrB1 is the only selenocysteine-containing protein, and we recently found that loss of MsrB1 perturbs the synaptic plasticity in mice, along with the astrogliosis in their brains. In this review, we summarized the effects resulting from Msr deficiency and the bioactivity of selenium in the central nervous system, especially those that we learned from the MsrB1 knockout mouse model. We hope it will be helpful in better understanding how the trace element selenium participates in the reduction of L-Met-O and becomes involved in neurobiology.


Cell Cycle ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 950-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiakun Zhang ◽  
Brett Schweers ◽  
Michael A. Dyer

Author(s):  
Emanuele G. Coci ◽  
Nadine Thau-Habermann ◽  
Tobias Maetzig ◽  
Zhixiong Li ◽  
Christoph Klein ◽  
...  

Genomics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duangporn Jamsai ◽  
Faten Zaibak ◽  
Jim Vadolas ◽  
Lucille Voullaire ◽  
Kerry J. Fowler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document