scholarly journals Patient–ventilator asynchrony in acute brain-injured patients: a prospective observational study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu-Ying Luo ◽  
Xuan He ◽  
Yi-Min Zhou ◽  
Yu-Mei Wang ◽  
Jing-Ran Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Esophageal Pressure ◽  
Respiratory Drive ◽  
Asynchrony Index ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Airway Occlusion ◽  
Brain Injured ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
Duration Of Ventilation ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Abstract Background Patient–ventilator asynchrony is common in mechanically ventilated patients and may be related to adverse outcomes. Few studies have reported the occurrence of asynchrony in brain-injured patients. We aimed to investigate the prevalence, type and severity of patient–ventilator asynchrony in mechanically ventilated patients with brain injury. Methods This prospective observational study enrolled acute brain-injured patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Esophageal pressure monitoring was established after enrollment. Flow, airway pressure, and esophageal pressure–time waveforms were recorded for a 15-min interval, four times daily for 3 days, for visually detecting asynchrony by offline analysis. At the end of each dataset recording, the respiratory drive was determined by the airway occlusion maneuver. The asynchrony index was calculated to represent the severity. The relationship between the prevalence and the severity of asynchrony with ventilatory modes and settings, respiratory drive, and analgesia and sedation were determined. Association of severe patient–ventilator asynchrony, which was defined as an asynchrony index  ≥ 10%, with clinical outcomes was analyzed. Results In 100 enrolled patients, a total of 1076 15-min waveform datasets covering 330,292 breaths were collected, in which 70,156 (38%) asynchronous breaths were detected. Asynchrony occurred in 96% of patients with the median (interquartile range) asynchrony index of 12.4% (4.3%–26.4%). The most prevalent type was ineffective triggering. No significant difference was found in either prevalence or asynchrony index among different classifications of brain injury (p > 0.05). The prevalence of asynchrony was significantly lower during pressure control/assist ventilation than during other ventilatory modes (p < 0.05). Compared to the datasets without asynchrony, the airway occlusion pressure was significantly lower in datasets with ineffective triggering (p < 0.001). The asynchrony index was significantly higher during the combined use of opioids and sedatives (p < 0.001). Significantly longer duration of ventilation and hospital length of stay after the inclusion were found in patients with severe ineffective triggering (p < 0.05). Conclusions Patient–ventilator asynchrony is common in brain-injured patients. The most prevalent type is ineffective triggering and its severity is likely related to a long duration of ventilation and hospital stay. Prevalence and severity of asynchrony are associated with ventilatory modes, respiratory drive and analgesia/sedation strategy, suggesting treatment adjustment in this particular population. Trial registration The study has been registered on 4 July 2017 in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03212482) (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03212482).

scholarly journals Accuracy of two pulse-oximetry measurements for INTELLiVENT-ASV in mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective observational study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinshu Katayama ◽  
Jun Shima ◽  
Ken Tonai ◽  
Kansuke Koyama ◽  
Shin Nunomiya
Keyword(s):  
Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Pulse Oximetry ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Arterial Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Arterial Oxygen ◽  
Arterial Blood Gas ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Ventilated Patients

AbstractRecently, maintaining a certain oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) range in mechanically ventilated patients was recommended; attaching the INTELLiVENT-ASV to ventilators might be beneficial. We evaluated the SpO2 measurement accuracy of a Nihon Kohden and a Masimo monitor compared to actual arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2). SpO2 was simultaneously measured by a Nihon Kohden and Masimo monitor in patients consecutively admitted to a general intensive care unit and mechanically ventilated. Bland–Altman plots were used to compare measured SpO2 with actual SaO2. One hundred mechanically ventilated patients and 1497 arterial blood gas results were reviewed. Mean SaO2 values, Nihon Kohden SpO2 measurements, and Masimo SpO2 measurements were 95.7%, 96.4%, and 96.9%, respectively. The Nihon Kohden SpO2 measurements were less biased than Masimo measurements; their precision was not significantly different. Nihon Kohden and Masimo SpO2 measurements were not significantly different in the “SaO2 < 94%” group (P = 0.083). In the “94% ≤ SaO2 < 98%” and “SaO2 ≥ 98%” groups, there were significant differences between the Nihon Kohden and Masimo SpO2 measurements (P < 0.0001; P = 0.006; respectively). Therefore, when using automatically controlling oxygenation with INTELLiVENT-ASV in mechanically ventilated patients, the Nihon Kohden SpO2 sensor is preferable.Trial registration UMIN000027671. Registered 7 June 2017.

Respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients with respiratory failure

1985 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 1849-1858 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Rossi ◽  
S. B. Gottfried ◽  
B. D. Higgs ◽  
L. Zocchi ◽  
A. Grassino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Constant ◽  
Inflation Rate ◽  
Respiratory Mechanics ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Airway Occlusion ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Resistance Value ◽  
Ventilated Patients

In 11 mechanically ventilated patients, respiratory mechanics were measured 1) during constant flow inflation and 2) following end-inflation airway occlusion, as proposed in model analysis (J. Appl. Physiol. 58: 1840–1848, 1985. During the latter part of inflation, the relationship between driving pressure and lung volume change was linear, allowing determination of static respiratory elastance (Ers) and resistance (RT). The latter represents in each patient the maximum resistance value that can obtain with the prevailing time constant inhomogeneity. Following occlusion, Ers and RT were also obtained along with RT (min) which represents a minimum, i.e., resistance value that would obtain in the absence of time constant inhomogeneity. A discrepancy between inflation and occlusion Ers and RT was found only in the three patients without positive end-expiratory pressure, and could be attributed to recruitment of lung units during inflation. In all instances Ers and RT were higher than normal. RT(min) was lower in all patients than the corresponding values of RT, indicating that resistance was frequency dependent due to time constant inequalities. Changes in inflation rate did not affect Ers, while RT increased with increasing flow.

scholarly journals Focus on renal blood flow in mechanically ventilated patients with SARS-CoV-2

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Fogagnolo ◽  
Salvatore Grasso ◽  
Martin Dres ◽  
Loreto Gesualdo ◽  
Elena Morelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Renal Blood Flow ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Venous Flow ◽  
Resistivity Index ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Abstract Background: Patients with ARDS due to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) seem particularly susceptible to AKI. Our hypothesis was that the renal blood flow could be more compromised in SARS-CoV-2 patients than in patients with “traditional” ARDS. We compared the renal resistivity index (RRI) and the renal venous flow (RVF) in ARDS patients with SARS-CoV-2 and in ARDS patients due to other etiologies.Materials and Methods: Prospective, observational study performed on 30 mechanically ventilated patients (15 with SARS-COV-2 ARDS and 15 with ARDS). Ultrasound Doppler measurements of RRI and RVF pattern were performed in each patient.Results: Patients with SARS-COV-2 ARDS had higher RRI than patients with ARDS (0.71[0.67–0.78] vs 0.64[0.60–0.74], p=0.04). RVF was not-continuous in 9/15 patients (71%) in the SARS-COV-2 ARDS group and in and 5/15 (33%) in the ARDS group (p=0.27). A linear correlation was found between PEEP and RRI in patients with SARS-COV-2 ARDS (r2=0.31; p=0.03) but not in patients with ARDS. Occurrence of AKI was 53% in patients with SARS-COV-2 ARDS and 33% in patients with ARDS (p=0.46).Conclusions: We found a more pronounced impairment in renal blood flow in mechanically ventilated patients with SARS-COV-2 ARDS, compared with patients with “traditional” ARDS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document