scholarly journals Extended high-frequency audiometry in healthy adults with different age groups

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingming Wang ◽  
Yu Ai ◽  
Yuechen Han ◽  
Zhaomin Fan ◽  
Peng Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Hearing Threshold ◽  
Healthy Population ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Hearing Ability ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
High Frequency Audiometry ◽  
Air Conduction

Abstract Background It was well-documented that extended high-frequency (EHF, above 8 kHz) hearing test could be more sensitive comparing with the conventional measurement on frequency below 8 kHz, regarding the early prediction of auditory damage in certain population. However, hardly any age-specific thresholds of EHF in population with normal hearing ability were observed. This study aims to monitor the age-dependent hearing thresholds at EHF (from 9 to 20 kHz) in healthy hearing population. Methods A total of 162 healthy participants (from 21 to 70 years) with normal conventional pure tone audiograms were recruited and separated into five groups by age. Conventional pure tone average was performed with frequencies from 0.25 to 8 kHz under air conduction and from 0.25 to 4 kHz under bone conduction. EHF audiometry from 9 to 20 kHz was determined under air conduction. Results The effects of aging on hearing were evident at frequencies above 4 kHz. The hearing thresholds of EHF were less than 26 dB HL before 30 years-olds. Hearing abilities in EHF were deteriorated starting from the 31 ~ 40 group and were most obvious in the 51 ~ 60 group and the 61 ~ 70 group with the maximum thresholds of 75 dB HL. Sensitivity of EHF was inversely proportional to the frequency within each age group, and to age among groups. Subjects under 30 years old were totally responsive up to 16 kHz, and 52.2% could respond to 20 kHz. Meanwhile, no responsiveness was recorded to 20 kHz in the 51 ~ 60 group and even to 18 kHz in the 61 ~ 70 group. No gender differences in hearing threshold was observed within each age group, except an obvious decline at frequencies of 4, 6, 8, and 9 kHz in male participants of the 41 ~ 50 group. Conclusions Hearing thresholds at EHF from 9 to 20 kHz were more sensitive than at frequencies below 8 kHz for hearing measurement, and aging inversely affected hearing ability at EHF in healthy population. Hearing thresholds at EHF deteriorated with age and raising frequency, while the upper frequency limit decreased with aging. Graphical abstract

scholarly journals A study of the high-frequency hearing thresholds of dentistry professionals

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (02) ◽  
pp. 226-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana de Melo ◽  
Cibele Santos ◽  
Andréa Lopes
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Hearing Threshold ◽  
Impaired Hearing ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Hearing Ability ◽  
Group I ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
High Frequency Audiometry ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Frequency Threshold

Summary Introduction: In the dentistry practice, dentists are exposed to harmful effects caused by several factors, such as the noise produced by their work instruments. In 1959, the American Dental Association recommended periodical hearing assessments and the use of ear protectors. Aquiring more information regarding dentists', dental nurses', and prosthodontists' hearing abilities is necessary to propose prevention measures and early treatment strategies. Objective: To investigate the auditory thresholds of dentists, dental nurses, and prosthodontists. Method: In this clinical and experimental study, 44 dentists (Group I; GI), 36 dental nurses (Group II; GII), and 28 prosthodontists (Group III; GIII) were included, , with a total of 108 professionals. The procedures that were performed included a specific interview, ear canal inspection, conventional and high-frequency threshold audiometry, a speech reception threshold test, and an acoustic impedance test. Results: In the 3 groups that were tested, the comparison between the mean hearing thresholds provided evidence of worsened hearing ability relative to the increase in frequency. For the tritonal mean at 500 to 2,000 Hz and 3,000 to 6,000 Hz, GIII presented the worst thresholds. For the mean of the high frequencies (9,000 and 16,000 Hz), GII presented the worst thresholds. Conclusion: The conventional hearing threshold evaluation did not demonstrate alterations in the 3 groups that were tested; however, the complementary tests such as high-frequency audiometry provided greater efficacy in the early detection of hearing problems, since this population's hearing loss impaired hearing ability at frequencies that are not tested by the conventional tests. Therefore, we emphasize the need of utilizing high-frequency threshold audiometry in the hearing assessment routine in combination with other audiological tests.

scholarly journals Hearing Thresholds Changes after MRI 1.5T of Head and Neck

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Bahaloo ◽  
Mohammad Hossein Davari ◽  
Mohammad Sobhan ◽  
Seyyed Jalil Mirmohammadi ◽  
Mohammad Taghi Jalalian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Hearing Threshold ◽  
Significant Shift ◽  
Auditory Thresholds ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
High Frequency Audiometry ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After

Introduction. Exposure to high intensity noise produced by MRI is a cause for concern. This study was conducted to determine the temporary and permanent effects of exposure to noise created by performing MRI on the hearing threshold of the subjects using conventional and extended high frequency audiometry. Methods. This semiexperimental study was performed on 35 patients referred to Shahid Rahnemoun Hospital for head and neck MRI due to different clinical conditions. The hearing threshold of patients was measured before, immediately after, and 24 hours after performing 1.5 Tesla MRI using conventional and extended high frequency audiometry. SPSS version 18 was used to compare the mean hearing thresholds before and after MRI using paired T test and repeated measures analysis. Results. Comparison of auditory thresholds in conventional and extended high frequencies before and immediately after MRI showed a significant shift at 4 KHz (P = 0.008 and P = 0.08 for right and left ears), 6 KHz (P = 0.03 and P = 0.01 for right and left ears), and 14 KHz (P =0.03 and P = 0.31 for right and left ears). However, there was no significant difference between audiometric thresholds before and 24 hours after MRI. Conclusion. Noise due to 1.5 Tesla MRI can only cause transient threshold shift.

scholarly journals The Relevance of the High Frequency Audiometry in Tinnitus Patients with Normal Hearing in Conventional Pure-Tone Audiometry

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronika Vielsmeier ◽  
Astrid Lehner ◽  
Jürgen Strutz ◽  
Thomas Steffens ◽  
Peter M. Kreuzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
High Frequency Hearing Loss ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Tinnitus Severity ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
High Frequency Audiometry

Objective. The majority of tinnitus patients suffer from hearing loss. But a subgroup of tinnitus patients show normal hearing thresholds in the conventional pure-tone audiometry (125 Hz–8 kHz). Here we explored whether the results of the high frequency audiometry (>8 kHz) provide relevant additional information in tinnitus patients with normal conventional audiometry by comparing those with normal and pathological high frequency audiometry with respect to their demographic and clinical characteristics.Subjects and Methods. From the database of the Tinnitus Clinic at Regensburg we identified 75 patients with normal hearing thresholds in the conventional pure-tone audiometry. We contrasted these patients with normal and pathological high-frequency audiogram and compared them with respect to gender, age, tinnitus severity, pitch, laterality and duration, comorbid symptoms and triggers for tinnitus onset.Results. Patients with pathological high frequency audiometry were significantly older and had higher scores on the tinnitus questionnaires in comparison to patients with normal high frequency audiometry. Furthermore, there was an association of high frequency audiometry with the laterality of tinnitus.Conclusion. In tinnitus patients with normal pure-tone audiometry the high frequency audiometry provides useful additional information. The association between tinnitus laterality and asymmetry of the high frequency audiometry suggests a potential causal role for the high frequency hearing loss in tinnitus etiopathogenesis.

scholarly journals Objective Estimation of Frequency-Specific Pure-Tone Hearing Thresholds following Bone-Conduction Hearing Aid Stimulation

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torsten Rahne ◽  
Thomas Ehelebe
Keyword(s):  
Pure Tone ◽  
Auditory Evoked Potentials ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Hearing Threshold ◽  
Mixed Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Bone Conduction Hearing ◽  
Highly Correlated ◽  
Fitting In ◽  
Hearing System

Patients suffering from conductive or mixed hearing loss may benefit from bone-conduction hearing systems (BAHS). The amount of amplification provided by the hearing system is selected based on the individual’s sensorineural frequency-specific threshold. With patients who are not able to provide thresholds behaviorally, such as young children, objective methods are required to estimate the unaided and aided hearing threshold and thus the success of the hearing system fitting. In a prospective study with ten adult Baha softband users, aided and unaided frequency-specific thresholds were estimated. Aided thresholds to tone bursts via Baha stimulation were obtained behaviorally and electrophysiologically using cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and were compared to pure-tone thresholds using routine clinical audiometry. For all stimulation frequencies, the frequency-specific electrophysiological and behavioral hearing thresholds measured with Baha stimulation were highly correlated and not different. Increased thresholds were observed only with the 0.5 kHz Baha stimulation as compared to the pure-tone audiogram. Objective measurement of frequency-specific hearing thresholds with CAEPs is applicable to BAHS users.

Estimation of the Benefit of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids

1994 ◽  
Vol 103 (11) ◽  
pp. 872-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
George G. Browning ◽  
Stuart Gatehouse
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Chronic Otitis Media ◽  
Valuable Alternative ◽  
Hearing Ability ◽  
Bone Anchored Hearing Aid ◽  
Bone Conduction Hearing ◽  
Air Conduction

Implantable bone conduction hearing aids are a valuable alternative to conventional aids for those who cannot use a conventional air conduction aid or find it difficult to use because of an aural discharge, most commonly due to chronic otitis media. Previously reported series of the use of a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) come from the originators of this device, and an independent report of their benefit and use, especially in previous air conduction aid users, would be of value. Twenty-three patients were evaluated at least 6 months after implantation of a BAHA. All 7 previous bone conduction aid users were delighted with their BAHA, reporting increased comfort and hearing benefit that was backed by audiometric evidence. Of the 16 individuals who previously used an air conduction aid, 11 (69%) were delighted users of their BAHA. Unfortunately, the other 5 (31%) reverted to solely using their air conduction aid. There was no obvious predictor as to how these individuals might have been identified prior to implantation. In particular, their pure tone thresholds, especially the bone conduction thresholds, were no different from those of the 11 BAHA users. However, in free field audiometry, the users gained superior benefit from their BAHA compared to their air conduction aid, whereas the nonusers did not. In conclusion, in all series to date, previous users of a conventional bone conduction aid have been delighted users of a BAHA and have gained superior audiometric benefit. This is not necessarily the case with previous air conduction aid users. As most patients rate hearing ability to be more important than absence of an aural discharge, it is important to develop methods that might predict benefit from a BAHA prior to implantation.

Effects of open heart surgery on hearing thresholds measured by high frequency audiometry

2007 ◽  
Vol 122 (8) ◽  
pp. 795-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Iriz ◽  
K Cagli ◽  
C Gocer ◽  
E Dursun ◽  
H Korkmaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Open Heart Surgery ◽  
Open Heart ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
High Frequency Audiometry ◽  
History Of

AbstractBackground:The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between pre- and post-operative hearing thresholds, measured by high frequency audiometry, in patients undergoing open heart surgery.Materials and methods:Pre- and post-operative audiometric assessments were performed in 20 patients undergoing open heart surgery. Pure tone audiometry testing was performed at 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000, 8000, 10 000, 12 000 and 14 000 Hz. We also evaluated: patients' clinical parameters (i.e. age, sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, history of myocardial infarction, and whether undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery or valve surgery); various operative details (operative temperatures, cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamp time); and post-operative clinical progress and its effect on hearing loss.Results:Patients' pre- and post-operative pure tone audiometric results were significantly different at some frequencies (p < 0.05). In addition, there was a significant impact of hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, history of myocardial infarction and cross-clamp time.Conclusions:This study shows that open heart surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass can lead to significant post-operative changes in hearing levels at some frequencies. Some additional patient parameters may influence this process. It seems possible that the risk of such hearing loss could be reduced; further studies may be able to define the significance of patients' concomitant disorders.

scholarly journals Absence of Cochleotoxicity Measured by Standard and High-Frequency Pure Tone Audiometry in a Trial of Once- versus Three-Times-Daily Tobramycin in Cystic Fibrosis Patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 2293-2299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Mulheran ◽  
Pauline Hyman-Taylor ◽  
Kelvin H.-V. Tan ◽  
Sarah Lewis ◽  
David Stableforth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cystic Fibrosis ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Aminoglycoside Therapy ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
High Frequency Audiometry

ABSTRACT We undertook assessment of hearing in patients with cystic fibrosis who were taking part in a large randomized controlled trial of once- versus three-times-daily tobramycin for pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis (the TOPIC study). All patients were eligible to have standard pure tone audiometry performed across the frequency range of 0.25 to 8 kHz. High-frequency pure tone audiometry over 10 to 16 kHz was also performed with a subset of patients. Audiometry was undertaken at the start of tobramycin treatment, at the end of a 14-day course of treatment, and at follow-up 6 to 8 weeks later. We enrolled 244 patients, of whom 219 (125 children and 94 adults) completed treatment. Nineteen patients were excluded from analysis due to abnormal baseline audiometry. Complete pre- and posttreatment standard audiological data were obtained for 168/219 patients. We found no significant differences in hearing thresholds when they were assessed at the baseline, at the end of treatment, and at follow-up 6 to 8 weeks later were compared. In addition, no significant differences in hearing thresholds were detected between treatment regimens. Similar results were obtained for the subset of 63/168 patients who underwent high-frequency audiometry. We conclude that for a single 14-day course of tobramycin treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis with no preexisiting auditory deficit, no measurable effect on hearing was apparent with either once- or three-times-daily treatment. Estimation of the cumulative cochleotoxic risk in cystic fibrosis patients due to repeated aminoglycoside therapy, as evidenced by the patients excluded from this study due to hearing loss, also requires further characterization.

High-Frequency Air-Conduction and Electric Bone-Conduction Audiometry: Age and Sex Variations

1991 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heikki Löppönen ◽  
Martti Sorri ◽  
Risto Bloigu
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Air Conduction ◽  
Age And Sex

Air Conduction Thresholds and Secretory Otitis Media: A Conventional and Extra-High Frequency Audiometric Comparison

1989 ◽  
Vol 98 (10) ◽  
pp. 767-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iain W. S. Mair ◽  
Oddbjørn Fjermedal ◽  
Einar Laukli
Keyword(s):  
Otitis Media ◽  
Middle Ear ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Secretory Otitis Media ◽  
Middle Ear Fluid ◽  
Ventilation Tubes ◽  
Air Conduction

A comparison has been made of air conduction threshold changes up to 1 year after myringotomy, aspiration of middle ear fluid, and insertion of ventilation tubes in ten patients with bilateral and 12 with unilateral secretory otitis media (SOM). Pure tone air conduction thresholds have been analyzed in three frequency groups: Low frequency (LF; 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz), high frequency (HF; 2,4, and 8 kHz), and extra-high frequency (EHF; 10, 12, 14, and 16 kHz). In the LF and HF ranges, significant improvement came during the first 24 hours after intubation, while in the EHF range, threshold lowering occurred gradually over the following 2 months. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document