scholarly journals Lower dementia risk with anticoagulation and ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daehoon Kim ◽  
Pil-Sung Yang ◽  
Boyoung Joung
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cognitive Decline ◽  
Elderly Population ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Dementia Risk ◽  
Increased Risk

AbstractAtrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia in the elderly population, has been associated with an impairment of cognitive function and an increased risk of dementia. Even though there does not appear to be solid evidence that any specific treatment prevents or delays AF-associated cognitive decline, evidence is accumulating regarding the possible treatment strategies for preventing dementia. Oral anticoagulation, especially non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants rather than warfarin use, has been suggested to be associated with reduced risk of dementia. Successfully maintaining sinus rhythm using catheter ablation might be also helpful in preventing subsequent dementia in patients with AF. In this review, we critically appraise the proposed treatment strategies for preventing AF-associated cognitive decline.

HEMATURIA AND OTHER KINDS OF BLEEDINGS ON NON-VITAMIN K ANTAGONIST ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: AN UPDATED OVERVIEW ON OCCURRENCE, PATHOMECHANISMS AND MANAGEMENT

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (11) ◽  
pp. 2528-2534
Author(s):  
Dagmara Wojtowicz ◽  
Anna Tomaszuk-Kazberuk ◽  
Jolanta Małyszko ◽  
Marek Koziński
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Anticoagulant Activity ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Reversal Agents ◽  
Limited Availability ◽  
Increased Risk

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are currently recommended for oral anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. In the setting, NOACs effectively prevent from stroke and systemic embolic events. In spite of the favorable safety profile of NOACs when compared with vitamin K antagonists, the use of any kind of anticoagulation is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. However, there is still a lack of direct comparisons of effectiveness and safety among NOACs. The results of indirect comparisons and meta-analyses suggest that the risk of various types of hemorrhagic complications differ among the particular NOACs. Management of bleeding in patients under NOAC therapy can be challenging because of limited availability of antidotes and the lack of routine laboratory test monitoring the NOAC anticoagulant effect. In case of life-threatening or critical site bleeding, reversal of NOAC anticoagulant activity is essential together with immediate implementation of causative treatment. Moreover, some patients on chronic NOAC therapy may require urgent surgery or invasive procedures. Specific reversal agents for NOACs have been developed, i.e. more widely available idarucizumab for the factor IIa inhibitor (dabigatran) and andexanet alfa for the factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) with limited availability. This review summarizes the occurrence and management of NOAC-related bleeding complications with a particular emphasis on hematuria.

scholarly journals Bleeding and thromboembolism due to drug-drug interactions with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants—a Swedish, register-based cohort study in atrial fibrillation outpatients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Holm ◽  
Buster Mannheimer ◽  
Rickard E Malmström ◽  
Erik Eliasson ◽  
Jonatan D Lindh
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Drug Register ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Purpose To study the association between interacting drugs and bleeding or thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation outpatients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Methods Population-based cohort study of outpatients treated with NOACs in Sweden from 2008 to 2017. Patients with atrial fibrillation and newly initiated NOAC treatment were identified in the Prescribed Drug Register. Comorbidities and outcome data were retrieved from the Patient Register and the Cause of Death Register. Cox-regression analyses were performed to evaluate the primary endpoints any severe bleed and ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack/stroke unspecified during the first six months of treatment. Secondary endpoints were gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, ischemic stroke, and venous thromboembolism. Results Increased risk of any severe bleed was found when NOAC treatment, and drugs with pharmacodynamic effect on bleeding were combined, compared to NOAC only. An increased risk with these combinations was evident for apixaban (hazard ratio (HR) 1.47; 95% CI 1.33–1.63), rivaroxaban (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.49–1.92), and dabigatran (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.05–1.52). For apixaban, there was an increased risk of any severe bleed when combined with CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.01–1.5). The use of inducers of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp was low in this cohort, and effects on ischemic stroke/TIA/stroke unspecified could not be established. Conclusion Increased risk of bleeding was seen for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions with NOACs. Prescribers need to be vigilant of the effect of interacting drugs on the risk profile of patients treated with NOACs.

P4758Label adherence of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: A nationwide study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H T Yu ◽  
P S Yang ◽  
E Jang ◽  
T H Kim ◽  
J S Uhm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Dose adjustment of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is indicated in some patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), based on selected patient factors or concomitant medications. Purpose We assessed the frequency of label adherence of NOAC dosing among AF patients and the associations between off-label NOAC dosing and clinical outcomes in real-world clinical practice. Methods We evaluated 53,649 AF patients treated with a NOAC using Korean National Health Insurance Service database during the period from January 2013 to December 2016. NOAC doses were classified as either underdosed or overdosed, consistent with U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to investigate the effectiveness and safety outcomes including stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. Results Overall, 16,757 NOAC-treated patients (31.2%) were underdosed, 4,492 were overdosed (8.4%), and 32,400 (60.4%) were dosed appropriately according to drug labeling. Compared with patients with label adherence, those who were underdosed or overdosed were older (71±8 and 75±7 years of age vs. 70±9 years of age, respectively; p<0.001), more likely female (39% and 53% vs. 38%, respectively; p<0.001), and had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (4.6±1.7 and 5.3±1.7 vs. 4.5±1.8, respectively; p<0.001). NOAC overdosing was associated with increased risk for stroke or systemic embolism (5.76 vs. 4.03 events/100 patient-years, p<0.001), major bleeding (4.77 vs. 2.94 events/100 patient-years, p<0.001), and all-cause mortality (5.43 vs. 3.05 events/100 patient-years, p<0.001) compared with label-adherent use. Figure 1 Conclusion In routine clinical practice, a significant proportion (almost 2 in 5) of AF patients received NOAC doses inconsistent with drug labeling. NOAC overdosing is associated with increased risk for stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality in Asian patient with AF.

scholarly journals Anticoagulation therapy in the elderly with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a double-edged sword

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Vetta ◽  
Gabriella Locorotondo ◽  
Giampaolo Vetta
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Hemorrhagic Events

Prevalence of non-valvular atrial fibrillation is increasing over time. Particularly in elderly population, treatment strategies to reduce the rate of stroke are challenging and still represent an unsolved cultural question. Indeed, the risk of thromboembolism increases in the elderly in parallel with the risk of bleeding. The frequent coexistence of several morbidities, frailty syndrome, polypharmacy, chronic kidney disease and dementia strengthens the perception that risk-benefit ratio of anticoagulant therapy could be unfavorable, and explains why such treatment is underused in the elderly. Recently, the introduction of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has allowed us to overcome the large number of limitations imposed by the use of vitamin K antagonists. In this manuscript, the benefits of individual NOACs in comparison with warfarin in elderly patients are reviewed. Targeted studies on complex elderly patients are needed to test usefulness of a geriatric comprehensive assessment, besides the scores addressing risk of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events. In the meantime, it is mandatory that use of anticoagulant therapy in most elderly people, currently excluded from randomized controlled trials, is prudent and responsible.

Prevalence of drug-drug interactions for oral anticoagulant drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation and relationship with outcomes: a population-based cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Proietti ◽  
L Cortesi ◽  
F Spagnoli ◽  
A Nobili ◽  
A Marengoni
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Administrative Databases ◽  
Italian Region ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Anticoagulant Drugs

Abstract Introduction The introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) changed the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, promising a better safety profile and a lower chance of interaction with drugs than vitamin K antagoniste (VKA). Aim To evaluate the prevalence of possible drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in a cohort of newly anticoagulated AF patients, their impact on outcomes and possible differences between VKA and NOACs users. Methods We performed an analysis derived from administrative databases in Lombardy Italian region. All patients ≥40 years admitted from 01/06/2013 to 30/06/2018 with an AF diagnosis that were VKA or NOACs new users were included in this analysis. Possible DDIs were evaluated according to the prescription of OAC therapy, on the basis of current available evidence. Stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), any bleeding and all-cause death were the study outcomes. Results Among the 122816 patients included in the analysis, mean (SD) age 76.3 (9.6) with 47.3% females, a mean (SD) CHA2DS2-VASc of 3.5 (1.4) was found. A total of 70180 (57.1%) patients were prescribed with VKA and 52636 (42.9%) with NOACs. A possible DDI was recorded in 63273 (51.5%). Patients exposed to DDIs were older and less likely female (both p&lt;0.0001) and with a higher mean (SD) CHA2DS2-VASc (p&lt;0.0001). Rate of stroke, ICH, any bleeding and all-cause death were higher in those patients exposed to DDIs (all p&lt;0.001). After full adjustment, exposure to possible DDIs was associated with an increased risk for any bleeding (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05–1.12) and all-cause death (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07–1.13), with no differences for stroke and ICH. Comparing VKA and NOACs patients exposed to possible DDIs, we found that VKA users exposed to possible DDIs, after adjustments, were at higher risk for all the outcomes (Table). Conclusions In a large cohort of AF patients newly prescribed with OAC, possible DDIs were largely prevalent, in particular in VKA users. Presence of a possible DDI is associated with an increased risk of any bleeding and all-cause death. VKA users exposed to a possible DDI were at higher risk for any outcome than NOACs users exposed to a possible DDI. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Overcoming global challenges in stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation: The role of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 950-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayrton Massaro ◽  
Robert P Giugliano ◽  
Bo Norrving ◽  
Ali Oto ◽  
Roland Veltkamp
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Ageing Population ◽  
Maximum Benefit ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Care Systems

Atrial fibrillation is the world's most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke. The global burden of atrial fibrillation is rising, commensurate with the ageing population. Well-controlled vitamin K antagonist-based anticoagulation has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke secondary to atrial fibrillation by two-thirds. However, patients with atrial fibrillation have frequently been denied anticoagulation because of a variety of perceived risks related to bleeding, falls, chronological age, and poor compliance. Even when vitamin K antagonists are used, maximum benefit and safety are only delivered when high quality control of therapy (TTR > 70%) is achieved, which has proven remarkably difficult in many health-care systems and amongst many patient groups. The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) offer solutions to many of the challenges of achieving widespread, safe, and effective anticoagulation for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation, yet their uptake into routine clinical practice remains variable. The evidence supporting their more widespread use to overcome the challenges of stroke prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation is reviewed in this article.

scholarly journals Is there a connection among atrial fibrillation, anticoagulant treatment, and dementia?

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_E) ◽  
pp. E79-E81
Author(s):  
Claudio Ferri ◽  
Rita Del Pinto
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cognitive Decline ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Cost Containment ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Anticoagulant Treatment ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Over Time

Abstract It is well-known that atrial fibrillation carries an increased risk of stroke and dementia. The connecting pathogenic common mechanism is the thromboembolic state provided by atrial fibrillation, which is responsible for the acute cerebral events, as well as more saddle anatomic lesions, which accumulating over time, could lead to a progressive cognitive decline. It is plausible, instinctively, that oral anticoagulation could decrease this risk, although the possibility of micro-haemorrhages, which cannot be ignored, could make anticoagulation in this contest even dangerous. In this regard, whether there are firm, well established, evidences documenting a significant reduction in stroke occurrence with anticoagulant treatment in atrial fibrillation, the same level of evidences are not supporting the treatment in preventing dementia. Bringing some more clarity to this issue could have some considerable advantages, also in term of healthcare cost containment, considering the high prevalence of atrial fibrillation and dementia in the elderly.

scholarly journals Post-infection cognitive impairments in a cohort of elderly patients with COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Hui Liu ◽  
Ye-Ran Wang ◽  
Qing-Hua Wang ◽  
Yang Chen ◽  
Xian Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cognitive Decline ◽  
Post Infection ◽  
Elderly Population ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Cognitive Status ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Understanding the long-term effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on cognitive function is essential for monitoring the cognitive decline in the elderly population. This study aims to assess the current cognitive status and the longitudinal cognitive decline in elderly patients recovered from COVID-19. Methods This cross-sectional study recruited 1539 COVID-19 inpatients aged over 60 years who were discharged from three COVID-19-designated hospitals in Wuhan, China, from February 10 to April 10, 2020. In total, 466 uninfected spouses of COVID-19 patients were selected as controls. The current cognitive status was assessed using a Chinese version of the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status-40 (TICS-40) and the longitudinal cognitive decline was assessed using an Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE). Cognitive assessments were performed 6 months after patient discharge. Results Compared with controls, COVID-19 patients had lower TICS-40 scores and higher IQCODE scores [TICS-40 median (IQR): 29 (25 to 32) vs. 30 (26 to 33), p < 0.001; IQCODE median (IQR): 3.19 (3.00 to 3.63) vs. 3.06 (3.00 to 3.38), p < 0.001]. Severe COVID-19 patients had lower TICS-40 scores and higher IQCODE scores than non-severe COVID-19 patients [TICS-40 median (IQR): 24 (18 to 28) vs. 30 (26 to 33), p < 0.001; IQCODE median (IQR): 3.63 (3.13 to 4.31) vs. 3.13 (3.00 to 3.56), p < 0.001] and controls [TICS-40 median (IQR): 24 (18 to 28) vs. 30 (26 to 33), p < 0.001; IQCODE median (IQR) 3.63 (3.13 to 4.31) vs. 3.06 (3.00 to 3.38), p < 0.001]. Severe COVID-19 patients had a higher proportion of cases with current cognitive impairment and longitudinal cognitive decline than non-severe COVID-19 patients [dementia: 25 (10.50 %) vs. 9 (0.69 %), p < 0.001; Mild cognitive impairment (MCI): 60 (25.21 %) vs. 63 (4.84 %), p < 0.001] and controls [dementia: 25 (10.50 %) vs. 0 (0 %), p < 0.001; MCI: 60 (25.21 %) vs. 20 (4.29 %), p < 0.001)]. COVID-19 severity, delirium and COPD were risk factors of current cognitive impairment. Low education level, severe COVID-19, delirium, hypertension and COPD were risk factors of longitudinal cognitive decline. Conclusions Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is associated with an increased risk of long-term cognitive decline in elderly population. COVID-19 patients, especially severe patients, should be intensively monitored for post-infection cognitive decline.

P4793Comparing the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in the elderly Asian patients with atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T F Chao ◽  
J N Liao ◽  
G Y H Lip ◽  
S A Chen
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Research Database

Abstract Background Stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) can be challenging. Comparisons of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in the elderly, at different age strata (age 65–74, 75–89, ≥90) in the daily practice have not been well described, particularly in Asians. We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of NOACs compared warfarin for stroke prevention in elderly patients with AF. Methods A total of 64,169 AF patients aged ≥65 years receiving NOACs or warfarin prescription were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The risks of adverse events were compared between NOACs and warfarin in all patients age ≥65 and specifically, with different age strata; that is 65–74 years, 75–89 years and >90 years. Results Overall NOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.869, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.812–0.931), ICH (aHR 0.524, 95% CI 0.456–0.601), major bleeding (aHR 0,824, 95% CI 0.776–0.875), mortality (aHR 0.511, 95% CI 0.491–0.532) and composite adverse events (aHR 0.646, 95% CI 0.625–0.667) compared to warfarin. There was heterogeneity in treatment effect for NOACs versus warfarin in different age strata, but the results still favored NOACs even among the very elderly (>90 years). The absolute risk difference and reductions in ICH and composite adverse events with NOAC use were even greater among the elderly compared to warfarin (Figure). Conclusions Compared to warfarin, NOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of adverse events, with heterogeneity in treatment effects among different age strata. Overall, the clear safety signal in favor of NOACs over warfarin was evident irrespective of age strata, being most marked in the most elderly.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document