scholarly journals Is it worth to perform initial non-operative treatment for patients with acute ACL injury?: a prospective cohort prognostic study

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Geun Park ◽  
Chul-Won Ha ◽  
Yong-Beom Park ◽  
Sang-Eun Na ◽  
Manyoung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Viable Option ◽  
Lachman Test ◽  
Clinical Evaluations ◽  
Tegner Score

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the result of implementing an initial non-operative treatment program for an acute ACL injury and to find if the timing of initiating the non-operative treatment is significant. Methods This study included a prospective cohort of 85 consecutive patients with acute ACL injury who were treated according to the above strategy for the initial 3 months with 1-year follow-up. Clinical evaluations were made by Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, Lachman test (LT), pivot-shit test (PST), and the side to side difference (SSD) by KT-2000 arthrometer. The results were analyzed according to the timing of initiating the non-operative treatment. Results Initially, 84% of the patients showed LT and PST ≤ grade 1, and 16% with ≥grade 2. At 1-year follow-up, 77 patients (91%) with LT and PST ≤ grade 1 did not receive reconstruction as copers and 8 patients with LT or PST ≥ grade 2 required reconstruction (six patients received the operation and two refused). The patients with LT and PST ≤ grade 1 showed average Lysholm score 91.2, average SSD 2.5 mm, and mean Tegner score decreased from 6.9 (pre-injury) to 6.2. Patients who started the non-operative treatment within 2 weeks after injury revealed superior rates of grade 0 or 1 instability than those who commenced the treatment later than 2 weeks after injury (P = 0.043). Conclusions Implementing a non-operative treatment with brace in acute phase of ACL injury appears to be an effective and viable option to achieve a reasonable clinical outcome. We recommend earlier initiation of the non-operative treatment to obtain a better result in patients with acute ACL injury.

scholarly journals Combined posteromedial or posterolateral PCL injuries: Anatomic repair and ligament bracing as a new treatment option - first results of a multicentre study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0030
Author(s):  
Tobias J. Gensior ◽  
Richard Glaab ◽  
Pierre Hepp ◽  
Johannes Zellner ◽  
Bastian Mester ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Multicentre Study ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Anatomic Repair ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Ligament Bracing ◽  
Ikdc Score ◽  
Tegner Score

Aims and Objectives: Acute, isolated PCL injuries can succesfully be managed non-operatively whereas combined PCL injuries usually require surgical management. Currently, there is a lack of evidence regarding the standard of treatment (repair vs. reconstruction, one-stage vs. two-stages procedures). Suture augmented repair leads to good and excellent results in cases of acute knee dislocations. This technique has not been investigated clinically in combined PCL injuries, yet. The aim of this multicentre study was to evaluate the clinical outcome after surgical repair with additional suture augmentation (ligament bracing) of all torn ligaments in acute combined pcl injuries (posteromedial or posterolateral). Materials and Methods: From 2016 to 2018, 25 patients with an acute combined PCL injury were treated with one stage anatomical repair and ligament bracing of the torn ligaments within 14 days at 6 trauma centres (5xGER, 1x SUI). Inclusion criteria: Follow-up min. 6 months, age > 18y. Exclusion criteria: ACL Injury, posteromedial AND posterolateral injury. During the follow-up evaluation, various scores were collected (International Knee Documentation Committee IKDC Score, Tegner Score , KOOS and Lysholm Score). Additional stress radiography was performed (TelosTM) postoperatively. Results: For now 14 combined PCL injuries (posteromedial or -lateral) with a follow-up of 20 months (range 8-33) were evaluated. 10 patients had a posteromedial (PCL + MCL/POL), 4 patients had a posterolateral (PCL + LCL) injury. 10 additional articular lesions were detected (6 meniscus tears, 4 grade IV chondral lesions) and 1 transitional peroneal nerve injury. The average IKDC score was 62.2±18.5, the average Lysholm score was 78±19.2, average KOOS 88.7±7.6. Median loss of activity in the Tegner score was 1 (range 0-5) point. Side-to-side pcl-stress-radiographs showed a difference at a mean of 4.8±3.0mm (range 1-10). 2 cases with symptomatic knee instability, both posterolateral, and 3 patients with knee stiffness needed reoperation. Interestingly, patients with posteromedial injuries showed predominantly good or excellent results according to Lysholm score and were graded as A (4/10) or B (2/10) whereas ligament bracing in posterolateral combined injuries had a high failure rate (Grade D 2/4). Conclusion: Primary anatomic repair and additional suture augmentation predominantly leads to good and excellent clinical results in cases of combined posteromedial PCL injuries. Patients with posterolateral injuries showed inferior clinical outcome and relatively high instability rates following ligament bracing. In conclusion, primary augmented suture repair seems to be a promising treatment option. The overall results of this study have to be evaluated for more exact recommendations.

CLINICAL OUTCOME OF ARTHROSCOPIC REDUCTION AND FIXATION BY PULL THROUGH SUTURE TECHNIQUE IN TIBIAL SPINE FRACTURES

2021 ◽  
pp. 17-20
Author(s):  
Ravi Shankar ◽  
Arunim Swarup ◽  
Rahul Kumar Gupta ◽  
Sunil Malhotra ◽  
Sparsh Jaiswal
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Suture Technique ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Spine Fractures ◽  
Lachman Test ◽  
Tibial Spine ◽  
Ikdc Score ◽  
Pull Through

Background -Tibial spine avulsion fracture is bony avulsions of anterior cruciate Ligament (ACL) from its attachment on the anteromedial portion of the intercondylartibial eminence. If not treated well, Tibial spine fractures can lead to non-union or malunion, which can lead to signicant disability in the form of exion deformity,loss of extension, or instability. Aims And Objectives: This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating clinical outcome of arthroscopic reduction and xation of fractures by pull through suture technique and complications associated with the procedure. Thi Material And Method: s prospective with retrospective study analyzed 20 patients (16 males and 4 females), with mean age of 28.6 ± 9.8 years (range, 15-55). Patients were classied by Meyers and Mckeever type III (n=16) and IV (n=4) and were operated arthroscopically by pull through suture technique. They were followed over a mean period of 10±2.8 months. Postoperative assessment was done by using Lachman test, Lysholm knee score and international knee documentation Committee (IKDC) score. Objective assessment of anterior translation of tibia was done by using indigenously developed device named Laxometer. At the end of follow up,17 of 20 patient had no or minimal anterior transl Results: ation of tibia by Lachman test. The mean preoperative Lysholm score in 20 knees was 38 (range 29 to 55) and mean post-operative Lysholm score was 96 (range 83-100). At the end of follow up 17 of 20 (85%) patients accessed by IKDC score were normal/ nearly normal grade A/B and 3 patients were abnormal (grade C). All patients achieved union within 3 months (range 8 to 17 weeks). 20% patients had restricted range of motion. Arthroscopic pull Conclusion: through suture technique has good clinical outcomes in both type III and type IV fractures, and in all age groups (open and closed physis) with minimal complications. This was evidenced by no instability and residual ACL deciency, postoperatively at 1 year. Most patients have excellent recovery with full return of knee range of motion.

Non-operative treatment of ACL injury is associated with opposing subjective and objective outcomes over 20 years of follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 2665-2671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Gföller ◽  
Elisabeth Abermann ◽  
Armin Runer ◽  
Christian Hoser ◽  
Mario Pflüglmayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Objective Outcomes

scholarly journals Revision Meniscal Repair - Failure rates, clinical outcome and patient satisfaction

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (6_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0022
Author(s):  
Andreas Fuchs ◽  
Ferdinand Kloos ◽  
Gerrit Bode ◽  
Kaywan Izadpanah ◽  
Norbert Südkamp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Sports Participation ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
The Mean ◽  
High Level

Aims and Objectives: Failure of isolated primary meniscal repair must be expected in 14% - 28%. Patients requiring revision surgery may benefit from revision meniscal repair, however, the results of revision meniscal repair remain unclear. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate the clinical outcome and failure rates of revision meniscal repair in patients with re-tears or failed healing after previous isolated meniscal repair in stable knee joints. Materials and Methods: A chart review was performed to identify all patients undergoing revision meniscal repair between 08/2010 and 02/2016. Only patients without concomitant procedures, without ligamentous insufficiency, and a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included. The records of all patients were reviewed to collect patient demographics, injury patterns of the meniscus, and details about primary and revision surgery. Follow-up evaluation included failure rates, clinical outcome scores (Lysholm Score, KOOS Score), sporting activity (Tegner scale), and patient satisfaction. Results: A total of 12 patients with a mean age of 22 ± 5 years were included. The mean time between primary repair and revision repair was 27 ± 21 months. Reasons for failed primary repairs were traumatic re-tears in 10 patients (83%) and failed healing in two patients (17%). The mean follow-up period after revision meniscal repair was 43 months. Failure of revision meniscal repair occurred in 3 patients (25%). In two of these patients, re-revision repair was performed. At final follow-up, the mean Lysholm Score was 95.2 with a range of 90-100, representing a good to excellent result in all patients. The final assessment of the KOOS subscores also showed good to excellent results. The mean Tegner scale was 6.8 ± 1.8, indicating a relatively high level of sports participation. Ten patients (83%) were either very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome. Conclusion: In patients with re-tears or failed healing after previous isolated meniscal repair, revision meniscal repair results in good to excellent knee function, high level of sports participation, and high patient satisfaction. The failure rate is comparable to isolated meniscal repair. Therefore, revision meniscal repair is worthwhile in order to save as much meniscal tissue as possible.

scholarly journals Quadriceps- vs. semitendinosus tendon in ACL reconstruction - a prospective study comparing autologous transplants regarding their clinical outcome

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0028
Author(s):  
Katrin Karpinski ◽  
Sebastian Bierke ◽  
Martin Häner ◽  
Tilman Hees ◽  
Wolf Petersen
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Quadriceps Tendon ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Semitendinosus Tendon ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Primary Acl Reconstruction

Aims and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knee stability and subjective outcome after primary ACL reconstruction using either autologous semitendinosus or quadriceps tendon. Materials and Methods: We evaluated a total of 50 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction - including 25 using the ipsilateral semitendinosus tendon (group I) and 25 patients with autologous quadriceps tendon graft (group II). The follow-up of this prospective comparative study was at least two years after surgery, comprising clinical assessment according to the International Documantation Committee (IKDC), KT1000 arthrometer testing and an additional questionnaire including the Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Lysholm score. Results: The mean postoperative side-to-side difference assessed by KT1000 arthrometer was 1.8mm for group I and 1.7mm for group II with no statistically significant difference. There was no statistically significant difference neither in the individual KOOS subscores nor the Lysholm score. No re-rupture or positive pivot-shift test occurred during follow-up for both groups. Conclusion: Semitendinosus- as well as quadriceps tendon are both equal regarding their clinical outcome. Thus, the quadriceps tendon may serve as a good alternative graft for primary ACL reconstruction.

Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years' follow-up

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 400-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Yu Fay ◽  
Wen-Cheng Huang ◽  
Jau-Ching Wu ◽  
Hsuan-Kan Chang ◽  
Tzu-Yun Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Heterotopic Ossification ◽  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽  
Viable Option ◽  
Cervical Arthroplasty ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Object Cervical arthroplasty has been accepted as a viable option for surgical management of cervical spondylosis or degenerative disc disease (DDD). The best candidates for cervical arthroplasty are young patients who have radiculopathy caused by herniated disc with competent facet joints. However, it remains uncertain whether arthroplasty is equally effective for patients who have cervical myelopathy caused by DDD. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of arthroplasty for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and patients with radiculopathy without CSM. Methods A total of 151 consecutive cases involving patients with CSM or radiculopathy caused by DDD and who underwent one- or two-level cervical arthroplasty were included in this study. Clinical outcome evaluations and radiographic studies were reviewed. Clinical outcome measurements included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of neck and arm pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) in every patient. For patients with CSM, Nurick scores were recorded for evaluation of cervical myelopathy. Radiographic studies included lateral dynamic radiographs and CT for detection of the formation of heterotopic ossification . Results Of the 151 consecutive patients with cervical DDD, 125 (82.8%; 72 patients in the myelopathy group and 53 in the radiculopathy group) had at least 24 months of clinical and radiographic follow-up. The mean duration of follow-up in these patients was 36.4 months (range 24–56 months). There was no difference in sex distribution between the 2 groups. However, the mean age of the patients in the myelopathy group was approximately 6 years greater than that of the radiculopathy group (53.1 vs 47.2 years, p < 0.001). The mean operation time, mean estimated blood loss, and the percentage of patients prescribed perioperative analgesic agents were similar in both groups (p = 0.754, 0.652, and 0.113, respectively). There were significant improvements in VAS neck and arm pain, JOA scores, and NDI in both groups. Nurick scores in the myelopathy group also improved significantly after surgery. In radiographic evaluations, 92.5% of patients in the radiculopathy group and 95.8% of those in the radiculopathy group retained spinal motion (no significant difference). Evaluation of CT scans showed heterotopic ossification in 34 patients (47.2%) in the myelopathy group and 25 patients (47.1%) in the radiculopathy group (p = 0.995). At a mean of over 3 years postoperatively, no secondary surgery was reported in either group. Conclusions The severity of myelopathy improves after cervical arthroplasty in patients with CSM caused by DDD. At 3-year follow-up, the clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty in DDD patients with CSM are similar to those patients who have only cervical radiculopathy. Therefore, cervical arthroplasty is a viable option for patients with CSM caused by DDD who require anterior surgery. However, comparison with the standard surgical treatment of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is necessary to corroborate the outcomes of arthroplasty for CSM.

Cell-Seeded Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: A Simplified Implantation Technique That Maintains High Clinical Outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 1028-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas H. Gomoll ◽  
Luiz Felipe Ambra ◽  
Amy Phan ◽  
Marissa Mastrocola ◽  
Nehal Shah
Keyword(s):  
Failure Rate ◽  
Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation ◽  
Defect Size ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Collagen Membrane ◽  
Chondrocyte Implantation ◽  
Ikdc Score ◽  
Tegner Score ◽  
Autologous Chondrocyte

Background: The use of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) remains limited, even though multiple studies have demonstrated success rates exceeding 75%. The procedure is perceived as invasive and technically challenging, presenting barriers to more widespread adoption. Purpose/Hypothesis: The objective of this study was to investigate whether outcomes and the failure rate of a simplified ACI technique (cs-ACI) were comparable with those of the more complicated traditional technique of a chondrocyte suspension injected under a collagen membrane (cACI). We hypothesized that the change in technique would not negatively affect outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Thirty-nine patients treated with the cs-ACI technique fulfilled the inclusion requirements. A group of 45 patients treated previously with standard cACI was used as a comparison. The functional outcomes were prospectively collected both preoperatively and postoperatively at the last follow-up. Failure was defined as any graft removal of more than 25% of the original defect size. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed postoperatively, and scans were assessed using a modified MOCART (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue) scoring system. Results: Group demographics were not significantly different, except for the defect size and mean follow-up: 4.09 years in the cACI group and 2.46 years in the cs-ACI group. Significant improvements were seen in all outcome measures except the Tegner score from the preoperative baseline to the latest follow-up for both the cACI group (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] score, from 42.0 to 63.4; Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]–Pain subscore, from 58.7 to 77.1; Lysholm score, from 57.2 to 69.7; and Tegner score, from 3.5 to 4.2) and the cs-ACI group (IKDC score, from 45.6 to 68.0; KOOS-Pain subscore, from 66.6 to 84.7; Lysholm score, from 53.7 to 75.4; and Tegner score, from 3.2 to 3.8). No significant difference was found between the groups at the latest follow-up. The failure rate at 2 years was not significantly different, while the total failure rate over the entire study period was significantly lower in the cs-ACI group than the cACI group (5% vs 24%, respectively). The overall MOCART score was not significantly different between the groups. Conclusion: The treatment of full-thickness articular cartilage defects with a simplified cell-seeded ACI technique demonstrated no significant differences in the failure rate and patient-reported outcomes when compared with a standard technique utilizing interrupted sutures and the injection of a cell suspension under a collagen membrane.

Over-the-top ACL Reconstruction Plus Extra-articular Lateral Tenodesis With Hamstring Tendon Grafts: Prospective Evaluation With 20-Year Minimum Follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (14) ◽  
pp. 3233-3242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Zaffagnini ◽  
Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli ◽  
Alberto Grassi ◽  
Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina ◽  
Federico Raggi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Joint Space ◽  
Hamstring Tendon ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lateral Tenodesis ◽  
Tegner Score ◽  
Over The Top

Background: There are few published studies with very long-term follow-up of combined intra- and extra-articular anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Purpose: To analyze clinical and radiographic outcomes of over-the-top ACL reconstruction plus extra-articular lateral tenodesis with autologous hamstrings at minimum 20-year follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Of 60 originally eligible patients who underwent over-the-top ACL reconstruction with double-stranded hamstring tendon (leaving intact graft tibial insertions) and extra-articular lateral plasty (performed with the remnant part of tendons), 52 were prospectively evaluated at a minimum 20-year follow-up (mean follow-up, 24 years; 41 men, 11 women; mean age at time of surgery, 25.5 ± 7.6 years). Twenty-nine patients were available for prospective evaluations: clinical (Lysholm, Tegner, and objective International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC]), instrumented (KT-2000), and radiographic (standard, long-standing, and Merchant views). Subjective KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) and objective inertial sensor pivot-shift analysis (KiRA) were carried out at final follow-up. Twenty-three patients were investigated by phone interview for subjective Tegner score and documented complications, rerupture, or revision surgery. Results: At final follow-up, mean Lysholm score was 85.7 ± 14.6; median Tegner score, 4 (range, 3-5); sport activity resumption, 86.2%; and objective IKDC score, good or excellent in 86% of patients (31%, A; 55%, B). Only 3 of 26 patients (12%) had >5-mm manual maximum KT-2000 side-to-side difference. KiRA system documented positive pivot-shift (>0.9-m/s2 tibial acceleration side-to-side difference) in these 3 of 26 patients (12%). Statistically significant changes were as follows: decrease in Tegner score from 7 (range, 6-8) at 5-year follow-up to 4 (range, 3-5) at 10 years ( P < .0001) and decrease in Lysholm score from 96.1 ± 7.3 at 10-year follow-up to 85.7 ± 14.6 at 20 years ( P = .0003). Radiographic evaluation demonstrated significant difference of medial joint space between injured and healthy knees in patients with concomitant medial meniscectomy (n = 8, 3.2 ± 0.6 vs 5.0 ± 1.8 mm, P = .0114). No significant differences were reported regarding lateral or patellofemoral joint space. One patient (2%) experienced rerupture, with 3 of 52 (5.8%) having a contralateral ACL injury (excluded from KT-2000 and radiographic evaluations). Overall, 4 of 29 clinical failures (objective IKDC, KT-2000) and 1 rerupture among 52 patients were registered at final follow-up. Conclusion: Studied surgical technique demonstrated good results in laxity control at 20-year minimum follow-up. The lateral extra-articular plasty associated with ACL reconstruction did not generate lateral knee or patellofemoral osteoarthritis. The factor increasing osteoarthritis was meniscectomy.

scholarly journals Clinical outcome after knee ligament reconstruction with tendon allografts

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Olav Drogset ◽  
Kristina Hovde Størset ◽  
Thea Marie Nitteberg ◽  
Tone Gifstad
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Postoperative Infections ◽  
Knee Ligament ◽  
Lachman Test ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical outcome for patients after knee ligament reconstructions with allografts at a university hospital. Methods A total of 33 patients received allografts for reconstructive knee surgery between 2007 and 2017. The follow up evaluation consisted of a clinical knee examination including evaluation of range of motion (ROM), lateral and medial laxity, the Lachman test, the Pivot shift test, the sag test, the posterior drawer test and checking for patellofemoral pain. The following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used; the Lysholm Function Score, the Tegner activity score, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Results Twenty-one (64%) patients were available for the follow-up evaluation and the mean follow-up time was 4.8 years. A total of 16 out of 21 patients had multiligament injuries of which the ACL was the ligament most frequently ruptured. At the time of follow-up, 14 out of 16 patients (87%) with ACL injury had Lachman test grade 0 or grade 1 + , and 12 out of 13 (92%) had a pivot shift grade 0 or 1 + . The mean Lysholm Score was 74. All mean KOOS subscale values were ≥ 59 at the follow-up. The preoperative Tegner activity score was 3 (range, 1–6) and 4 (range, 2–6) at follow up. There were no deep postoperative infections. A total of 19 out of 21 patients (90%) reported that they would have undergone surgery again had they known the clinical outcome in advance. Conclusions The patients improved from the preoperative score to the follow-up score in the knee-related Quality of Life (QoL) KOOS subscale. None of the patients were diagnosed with deep postoperative infections.

scholarly journals Results of multiple ligament reconstruction after knee dislocation——A prospective study with 95 patients and minimum 2-year follow up

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Li ◽  
Yan Xiong ◽  
Zhong Zhang ◽  
Xin Tang ◽  
Gang Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stage ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Ligament Injuries ◽  
Chronic Stage ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Subjective Score ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tegner Score

Abstract Background There is still a lack of clinical data in arthroscopic treatment for treating multiple ligament injuries. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with multiple ligament injuries undergoing treatment based on the classification stage and type of injury. Methods A prospective, clinical trial on multiple ligament injuries was planned, which included 95 patients (58 men and 37 women; age: 42.8 ± 11.9 [range, 18–63] years) from October 2017 to June 2018. Injuries were classified into three stages (emergency stage < 24 h; acute stage: 24 h to 3 weeks, and chronic stage: > 3 weeks) and six types (KD I–VI) based on injuries time and structures, which indicated appropriate treatments. The clinical outcomes were evaluated at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks and at 6, 9, 12 months and 24 months after surgery. The final choices in efficacy index included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and range of motion. Results During the follow-up, all patients exhibited statistically significant functional improvement in the injured limb compared with their preoperative situation. The mean postoperative scores of acute stage patients at 2-year follow-up were IKDC subjective score, 77.54 ± 11.53; Lysholm score, 85.96 ± 9.39; Tegner score, 4.13 ± 1.08; and VAS score, 1.21 ± 0.76. The mean postoperative scores of chronic stage patents at 2-year follow-up were IKDC subjective score, 74.61 ± 12.38; Lysholm score, 81.71 ± 10.80; Tegner score, 3.96 ± 1.14; and VAS score, 1.71 ± 0.60. The IKDC subjective score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score were significantly improved (P < 0.01) and the VAS score was significantly decreased (P < 0.01) at 2-year follow-up. Regarding the multiple ligament injuries classification, patients with more structural damage in stages V and VI showed less progress in functional recovery than those in stages I–IV. Conclusions This new classification with three stages and six types helps to identify the severity of injury and plan the management effectively. The outcomes were encouraging and the subjective functional results showed significant improvement at 2-year follow-up. Study design Prospective clinical trial. Level of evidence II

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document