scholarly journals Costs of implementing community-based intervention for HIV testing in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florida Uzoaru ◽  
Ucheoma Nwaozuru ◽  
Jason J. Ong ◽  
Felix Obi ◽  
Chisom Obiezu-Umeh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Community-based interventions (CBIs) are interventions aimed at improving the well-being of people in a community. CBIs for HIV testing seek to increase the availability of testing services to populations that have been identified as at high risk by reaching them in homes, schools, or community centers. However, evidence for a detailed cost analysis of these community-based interventions in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is limited. We conducted a systematic review of the cost analysis of HIV testing interventions in SSA. Methods Keyword search was conducted on SCOPUS, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Global Health databases. Three categories of key terms used were cost (implementation cost OR cost-effectiveness OR cost analysis OR cost-benefit OR marginal cost), intervention (HIV testing), and region (sub-Saharan Africa OR sub-Saharan Africa OR SSA). CBI studies were included if they primarily focused on HIV testing, was implemented in SSA, and used micro-costing or ingredients approach. Results We identified 1533 citations. After screening, ten studies were included in the review: five from East Africa and five from Southern Africa. Two studies conducted cost-effectiveness analysis, and one study was a cost-utility analysis. The remainder seven studies were cost analyses. Four intervention types were identified: HIV self-testing (HIVST), home-based, mobile, and Provider Initiated Testing and Counseling. Commonly costed resources included personnel (n = 9), materials and equipment (n = 6), and training (n = 5). Cost outcomes reported included total intervention cost (n = 9), cost per HIV test (n = 9), cost per diagnosis (n = 5), and cost per linkage to care (n = 3). Overall, interventions were implemented at a higher cost than controls, with the largest cost difference with HIVST compared to facility-based testing. Conclusion To better inform policy, there is an urgent need to evaluate the costs associated with implementing CBIs in SSA. It is important for cost reports to be detailed, uniform, and informed by economic evaluation guidelines. This approach minimizes biases that may lead decision-makers to underestimate the resources required to scale up, sustain, or reproduce successful interventions in other settings. In an evolving field of implementation research, this review contributes to current resources on implementation cost studies.

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e039495
Author(s):  
Lydia Atuhaire ◽  
Olatunji Adetokunboh ◽  
Constance Shumba ◽  
Peter S Nyasulu

IntroductionFemale sex workers (FSWs) are a known high-risk group that are at increased risk of HIV transmission due to exposure to multiple sexual partners and inability to negotiate safe sex attributed to challenging economic circumstances. Previous systematic reviews have examined the effectiveness of HIV interventions prioritising FSWs and have shown that targeted interventions improve access to HIV prevention and treatment services. Interventions that increase FSWs’ uptake of services are well documented; however, evidence on specific interventions aimed at improving FSWs’ continuity in HIV care along the treatment cascade is lacking. This systematic review aims to document the performance of community-based interventions along the HIV treatment cascade.Methods and analysisWe will use a sensitive search strategy for electronic bibliographic databases, bibliographies of included articles and grey literature sources. In addition, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS and the WHO websites, peer-reviewed conference papers and grey literature sources will be searched for additional reports of sex work programmes. We will include randomised controlled trials, cross-sectional surveys and cohort interventions where community-based HIV services were provided to FSWs and measure the performance of the HIV intervention on one or more cascade stages. We will conduct a systematic review of studies published from 2004 to present within the sub-Saharan Africa region. We will report quantitative study outcomes of HIV testing and diagnosis, linkage to care, initiation on antiretroviral therapy and viral suppression. We will analyse the data using the random-effects meta-analysis method, and funnel plots will be used to assess the publication bias.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic review will not require ethical approval; we will publish data from manuscripts. The results of this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020157623.


2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 20182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darshini Govindasamy ◽  
Rashida A Ferrand ◽  
Stephanie MS Wilmore ◽  
Nathan Ford ◽  
Saeed Ahmed ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. e0200737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalpana Sabapathy ◽  
Bernadette Hensen ◽  
Olivia Varsaneux ◽  
Sian Floyd ◽  
Sarah Fidler ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e045748
Author(s):  
Gedefaw Diress ◽  
Amanuel Addisu ◽  
Melese Linger Endalifer

IntroductionVoluntary HIV testing is a vital preventive measure to reduce HIV transmission. Existing evidence on the association between HIV-related knowledge and HIV testing service utilisation shows inconsistent findings. Therefore, the aim of this review is to assess whether knowledge of HIV is related to improvement in voluntary HIV testing service utilisation among university students in Sub-Saharan Africa.Methods and analysisA systematic review of studies on the association of HIV-related knowledge and voluntary HIV testing service utilisation among university students will be conducted. We will search several electronic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, African Journals Online, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, for all study types looking at the association between HIV-related knowledge and voluntary HIV testing service utilisation. Two reviewers will independently screen all retrieved records and full-text articles and extract data. The Higgins I2 test will be used to assess heterogeneity between studies. Random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted, if feasible and appropriate. Additional analyses will be performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Stata statistical software (V.14) will be used to analyse the data.Ethics and disseminationFormal ethical approval is not required because the systematic review relies on primary studies. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, conference presentation and the popular press.


PLoS Medicine ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e1001351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalpana Sabapathy ◽  
Rafael Van den Bergh ◽  
Sarah Fidler ◽  
Richard Hayes ◽  
Nathan Ford

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 10-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supriya Sarkar ◽  
Phaedra Corso ◽  
Shideh Ebrahim-Zadeh ◽  
Patricia Kim ◽  
Sana Charania ◽  
...  

Nature ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 528 (7580) ◽  
pp. S77-S85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monisha Sharma ◽  
Roger Ying ◽  
Gillian Tarr ◽  
Ruanne Barnabas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document