scholarly journals Comparative study on hemato- and nephrotoxicity profile of weekly versus every 3-weekly cisplatin dosage during induction chemotherapy in locally advanced head neck squamous cell carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adity Chakraborty ◽  
Abhinandan Bhattacharjee ◽  
Amlan Jyoti Nath ◽  
Shibashis Deb ◽  
Aakanksha Rathor

Abstract Background Cisplatin is a frontline anticancer drug routinely used as part of concurrent chemoradiation administered at 3-weekly (100 mg/m2) dose. However, its role as fractionated weekly dose has achieved favorable outcome in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (LA-SCCHN) during induction chemotherapy (IC). We therefore sought to compare the toxicity outcomes of patients with LA-SCCHN treated with platinum-based IC at a single institution study using split-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. We compared the hematological and renal toxicity profile between the weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m2) (group A) versus 3-weekly (100 mg/m2) (group B) dosage schedule in this setting. Results The median age of the patients in groups A and B were 49.1 years and 48.27 years respectively with male:female ratio of 4:1. Most of the patients were of oropharyngeal cancers. Group A patients showed greater neutropenia (40.2%) than group B (20.6%). There was statistically significant fall in Hb% level in group A (13.9%) than in group B (11.9%). Renal profile showed greater rise in serum urea and serum creatinine (52.7%) in group B than in group A (52.29%) with statistically significant difference. Conclusions Since toxicities induced by high-dose cisplatin are irreversible and reduce quality of life in patients, the weekly regimen may be preferred owing to less renal toxicity, lesser hospitalization and more feasible in situations with high patient load and limited resources.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18512-e18512
Author(s):  
Bruna Bighetti ◽  
José Tristão Neto ◽  
Renata do Socorro Monteiro Pereira ◽  
LAÍS CRISTHINE SOUZA ◽  
Ilka Lopes Santoro ◽  
...  

e18512 Background: Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a well-established regimen used for adjuvant and/or head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) radical treatment. The most classic protocol for chemoradiotherapy remains the administration of Cisplatin 100mg/m² EV D1 q3-week period, 3 cycles. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the weekly 40mg/m² cisplatin regimen. Methods: we conducted a retrospective study from 2007-2020 with 102 patients treated at a national reference institution. All of them with HNSCC received concurrent CRT with weekly cisplatin 40mg/m² EV D1. We analyzed the overall survival (OS), local recurrence and tolerability in this scheme. Results: The median cisplatin cumulative dose received by our patients was 240mg/m². Hence, we divided them in two groups for the analysis: Group A (41 patients) received less than 240mg/m² cisplatin total dose and Group B (61 patients) received more or equal 240mg/m² cisplatin total dose. Both groups were equally balanced between sex, clinic stage, histologic grade and clinic status. We found that the Group A experienced 5 deaths (12.2%) while the Group B experienced 6 deaths (9.8%). The mean time to recurrence disease in the Group A was 45.68 months and in Group B 60.22 months (p = 0.958). The estimated overall survival in the Group A was 150 months and in the Group B was 116.4 months (p = 0.443). Conclusions: The weekly cisplatin dose regimen showed to be feasible, more tolerable, and less toxic and with no difference in terms of OS then the classic 3-week cisplatin protocol in the CRT setting. Our group suggests that the 240mg/m² cumulative cisplatin weekly schedule should be a better option for CRT treatments then the classic cisplatin regimen. A phase III clinical trial is warranted to further understanding of this framework. Key-words: head and neck cancer, cisplatin, radiotherapy


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 15-15
Author(s):  
Shah-Hwa Chou ◽  
Yu-Wei Liu

Abstract Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) was originally designed and used in colorectal surgery. Recently there were some related reports of its implementation on esophageal cancer surgery, mainly adenocarcinoma. This study is to determine if ERAS can be effectively and safely applied to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Asian population. Methods In early 2012, our perioperative management protocol was reinvented and has been implemented thereafter. So two groups of patients were set up and compared. Group A is the patients operated on before 2012, managed by the old protocol. Group B is the patients managed under the new protocol. Their demographics, complications, hospital stay and charges were reviewed and analysed. Results Group A 65 patients. Group B 61 patients. The ventilator days, ICU stay and postoperative stay were statistically shorter in group B. There was no hospital mortality in either groups. No increase of complications was noted in group B. The hospital charges in group B were lower although statistically insignificant. Conclusion The new protocol of perioperative care is safe and effectively enhanced the postoperative recovery after esophagectomy and reconstruction for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Table 1. Clinical protocol for group A and B POD, post-operative day; ICU, intensive care unit; TPN, total parenteral nutrition; J-P drain, Jackson-Pratt drain; N/S, normal saline; CVC, central venous catheter; NG, nasogastric tube; OR, operating room; NPO, nil per os; IV, intravenous; PCA, patient control analgesia. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (9) ◽  
pp. 833-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Noronha ◽  
C Goswami ◽  
S Patil ◽  
A Joshi ◽  
V M Patil ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground:Docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil is an efficacious induction regimen but is more toxic than cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil. This study aimed to determine whether docetaxel and cisplatin without 5-fluorouracil maintains efficacy while decreasing toxicity.Methods:A multicenter non-comparative pilot study of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was performed. Patients received primary therapy comprising three cycles of 75 mg/m2 docetaxel and 75 mg/m2 cisplatin followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the response rate to the docetaxel and cisplatin induction regimen.Results:A total of 26 patients were enrolled: of these, 23 (88.5 per cent) received all three docetaxel and cisplatin cycles. Common grade 3–4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (19.2 per cent of patients), diarrhoea (19.2 per cent) and non-neutropenic infection (15.4 per cent). The overall response rate to docetaxel and cisplatin induction chemotherapy was 65.4 per cent. A total of 23 patients (88.5 per cent) subsequently received chemoradiotherapy with a median radiotherapy dose of 70 Gy. The response rate to chemoradiotherapy was 73 per cent. At a median follow up of 44 months, the 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 62 per cent and 69 per cent, respectively.Conclusion:Docetaxel and cisplatin induction chemotherapy is a feasible induction regimen with comparable efficacy to docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Manikandan Dhanushkodi ◽  
Vijay Gnanaguru ◽  
Venkatraman Radhakrishnan ◽  
JayachandranPerumal Kalaiarasi ◽  
ArunKumar Rajan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document