scholarly journals Using Long-term Time-lapse Imaging of Mammalian Cell Cycle Progression for Laboratory Instruction and Analysis

2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 284-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward H. Hinchcliffe
2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (23) ◽  
pp. 10205-10219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke F. Peterson ◽  
Anita Boyapati ◽  
Velvizhi Ranganathan ◽  
Atsushi Iwama ◽  
Daniel G. Tenen ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The family of cyclin D proteins plays a crucial role in the early events of the mammalian cell cycle. Recent studies have revealed the involvement of AML1 transactivation activity in promoting cell cycle progression through the induction of cyclin D proteins. This information in combination with our previous observation that a region in AML1 between amino acids 213 and 289 is important for its function led us to investigate prospective proteins associating with this region. We identified cyclin D3 by a yeast two-hybrid screen and detected AML1 interaction with the cyclin D family by both in vitro pull-down and in vivo coimmunoprecipitation assays. Furthermore, we demonstrate that cyclin D3 negatively regulates the transactivation activity of AML1 in a dose-dependent manner by competing with CBFβ for AML1 association, leading to a decreased binding affinity of AML1 for its target DNA sequence. AML1 and its fusion protein AML1-ETO have been shown to shorten and prolong the mammalian cell cycle, respectively. In addition, AML1 promotes myeloid cell differentiation. Thus, our observations suggest that the direct association of cyclin D3 with AML1 functions as a putative feedback mechanism to regulate cell cycle progression and differentiation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 283 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anuradha Chauhan ◽  
Stephan Lorenzen ◽  
Hanspeter Herzel ◽  
Samuel Bernard

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 4623-4632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Hitomi ◽  
Dennis W. Stacey

ABSTRACT Novel techniques were used to determine when in the cell cycle of proliferating NIH 3T3 cells cellular Ras and cyclin D1 are required. For comparison, in quiescent cells, all four of the inhibitors of cell cycle progression tested (anti-Ras, anti-cyclin D1, serum removal, and cycloheximide) became ineffective at essentially the same point in G1 phase, approximately 4 h prior to the beginning of DNA synthesis. To extend these studies to cycling cells, a time-lapse approach was used to determine the approximate cell cycle position of individual cells in an asynchronous culture at the time of inhibitor treatment and then to determine the effects of the inhibitor upon recipient cells. With this approach, anti-Ras antibody efficiently inhibited entry into S phase only when introduced into cells prior to the preceding mitosis, several hours before the beginning of S phase. Anti-cyclin D1, on the other hand, was an efficient inhibitor when introduced up until just before the initiation of DNA synthesis. Cycloheximide treatment, like anti-cyclin D1 microinjection, was inhibitory throughout G1 phase (which lasts a total of 4 to 5 h in these cells). Finally, serum removal blocked entry into S phase only during the first hour following mitosis. Kinetic analysis and a novel dual-labeling technique were used to confirm the differences in cell cycle requirements for Ras, cyclin D1, and cycloheximide. These studies demonstrate a fundamental difference in mitogenic signal transduction between quiescent and cycling NIH 3T3 cells and reveal a sequence of signaling events required for cell cycle progression in proliferating NIH 3T3 cells.


2010 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 107-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Bou Kheir ◽  
Anders H. Lund

Progression of the mammalian cell cycle depends on correct timing and co-ordination of a series of events, which are managed by the cellular transcriptional machinery and epigenetic mechanisms governing genome accessibility. Epigenetic chromatin modifications are dynamic across the cell cycle, and are shown to influence and be influenced by cell-cycle progression. Chromatin modifiers regulate cell-cycle progression locally by controlling the expression of individual genes and globally by controlling chromatin condensation and chromosome segregation. The cell cycle, on the other hand, ensures a correct inheritance of epigenetic chromatin modifications to daughter cells. In this chapter, we summarize the current knowledge on the dynamics of epigenetic chromatin modifications during progression of the cell cycle.


2019 ◽  
Vol 218 (12) ◽  
pp. 4042-4062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reito Watanabe ◽  
Masatoshi Hara ◽  
Ei-ichi Okumura ◽  
Solène Hervé ◽  
Daniele Fachinetti ◽  
...  

The kinetochore is essential for faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis. To form a functional kinetochore, constitutive centromere-associated network (CCAN) proteins are assembled on the centromere chromatin that contains the centromere-specific histone CENP-A. CENP-C, a CCAN protein, directly interacts with the CENP-A nucleosome to nucleate the kinetochore structure. As CENP-C is a hub protein for kinetochore assembly, it is critical to address how the CENP-A–CENP-C interaction is regulated during cell cycle progression. To address this question, we investigated the CENP-C C-terminal region, including a conserved CENP-A–binding motif, in both chicken and human cells and found that CDK1-mediated phosphorylation of CENP-C facilitates its binding to CENP-A in vitro and in vivo. We observed that CENP-A binding is involved in CENP-C kinetochore localization during mitosis. We also demonstrate that the CENP-A–CENP-C interaction is critical for long-term viability in human RPE-1 cells. These results provide deeper insights into protein-interaction network plasticity in centromere proteins during cell cycle progression.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Brooks

AbstractThe Restriction Point (R) in the mammalian cell cycle is regarded as a critical transition in G1 when cells become committed to enter S phase even in the absence of further growth factor stimulation. Classic time-lapse studies by Zetterberg and Larsson suggested that the acquisition of growth factor independence (i.e. passage of R) occurred very abruptly 3-4 hours after mitosis, with most cell cycle variability arising between R and entry into S phase. However, the cycle times of the post-R cells that continued on to mitosis after serum step-down without perturbation were far less variable than the control cells with which they were compared. A re-analysis of the data, presented here, shows that when the timing of R and entry in mitosis are compared for the same experiments, the curves are superimposable and statistically indistinguishable. This indicates that the data are compatible with the timing of R contributing to much of the overall variability in the cell cycle, contrary to the conclusions of Zetterberg and colleagues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document