Wave propagation in heterogeneous, porous media: A velocity‐stress, finite‐difference method

Geophysics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Dai ◽  
A. Vafidis ◽  
E. R. Kanasewich

A particle velocity‐stress, finite‐difference method is developed for the simulation of wave propagation in 2-D heterogeneous poroelastic media. Instead of the prevailing second‐order differential equations, we consider a first‐order hyperbolic system that is equivalent to Biot’s equations. The vector of unknowns in this system consists of the solid and fluid particle velocity components, the solid stress components, and the fluid pressure. A MacCormack finite‐difference scheme that is fourth‐order accurate in space and second‐order accurate in time forms the basis of the numerical solutions for Biot’s hyperbolic system. An original analytic solution for a P‐wave line source in a uniform poroelastic medium is derived for the purposes of source implementation and algorithm testing. In simulations with a two‐layer model, additional “slow” compressional incident, transmitted, and reflected phases are recorded when the damping coefficient is small. This “slow” compressional wave is highly attenuated in porous media saturated by a viscous fluid. From the simulation we also verified that the attenuation mechanism introduced in Biot’s theory is of secondary importance for “fast” compressional and rotational waves. The existence of seismically observable differences caused by the presence of pores has been examined through synthetic experiments that indicate that amplitude variation with offset may be observed on receivers and could be diagnostic of the matrix and fluid parameters. This method was applied in simulating seismic wave propagation over an expanded steam‐heated zone in Cold Lake, Alberta in an area of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processing. The results indicate that a seismic surface survey can be used to monitor thermal fronts.

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Sari

Accurate solutions of the porous media equation that usually occurs in nonlinear problems of heat and mass transfer and in biological systems are obtained using a compact finite difference method in space and a low-storage total variation diminishing third-order Runge-Kutta scheme in time. In the calculation of the numerical derivatives, only a tridiagonal band matrix algorithm is encountered. Therefore, this scheme causes to less accumulation of numerical errors and less use of storage space. The computed results obtained by this way have been compared with the exact solutions to show the accuracy of the method. The approximate solutions to the equation have been computed without transforming the equation and without using linearization. Comparisons indicate that there is a very good agreement between the numerical solutions and the exact solutions in terms of accuracy. This method is seen to be a very good alternative method to some existing techniques for such realistic problems.


1989 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 1210-1230
Author(s):  
C. R. Daudt ◽  
L. W. Braile ◽  
R. L. Nowack ◽  
C. S. Chiang

Abstract The Fourier method, the second-order finite-difference method, and a fourth-order implicit finite-difference method have been tested using analytical phase and group velocity calculations, homogeneous velocity model calculations for disperson analysis, two-dimensional layered-interface calculations, comparisons with the Cagniard-de Hoop method, and calculations for a laterally heterogeneous model. Group velocity rather than phase velocity dispersion calculations are shown to be a more useful aid in predicting the frequency-dependent travel-time errors resulting from grid dispersion, and in establishing criteria for estimating equivalent accuracy between discrete grid methods. Comparison of the Fourier method with the Cagniard-de Hoop method showed that the Fourier method produced accurate seismic traces for a planar interface model even when a relatively coarse grid calculation was used. Computations using an IBM 3083 showed that Fourier method calculations using fourth-order time derivatives can be performed using as little as one-fourth the CPU time of an equivalent second-order finite-difference calculation. The Fourier method required a factor of 20 less computer storage than the equivalent second-order finite-difference calculation. The fourth-order finite-difference method required two-thirds the CPU time and a factor of 4 less computer storage than the second-order calculation. For comparison purposes, equivalent runs were determined by allowing a group velocity error tolerance of 2.5 per cent numerical dispersion for the maximum seismic frequency in each calculation. The Fourier method was also applied to a laterally heterogeneous model consisting of random velocity variations in the lower half-space. Seismograms for the random velocity model resulted in anticipated variations in amplitude with distance, particularly for refracted phases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document