Residual migration‐velocity analysis in the plane‐wave domain

Geophysics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 1258-1269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junru Jiao ◽  
Paul L. Stoffa ◽  
Mrinal K. Sen ◽  
Roustam K. Seifoullaev
Keyword(s):  
Plane Wave ◽  
Field Data ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
New Method ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Interval Velocities

Over the last few years, migration‐velocity analysis methods have been developed for 2‐D and 3‐D models by extending the assumptions and approximations used for rms velocity models. Computational requirements for these analyses have increased dramatically because top‐down layer‐stripping migration is needed to derive interval velocities directly instead of using rms velocities and then converting into interval velocities. We establish exact equations for 1‐D and 2‐D residual velocity analysis in the depth‐plane‐wave domain and use these in an iterative and interactive migration velocity analysis program. The new method updates interval velocities directly in a top‐down residual‐difference correction for all layers after prestack depth migration instead of top‐down layer‐stripping migration followed by residual analysis. This makes the new method a suitable tool for migration velocity analysis, especially for 3‐D surveys. We test the method on synthetic and field data. The field data results show that a reasonable velocity model is obtained and most common image gathers are correctly imaged using no more than four iterations.

Migration velocity analysis from locally coherent events in 2‐D laterally heterogeneous media, Part I: Theoretical aspects

Geophysics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 1202-1212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hervé Chauris ◽  
Mark S. Noble ◽  
Gilles Lambaré ◽  
Pascal Podvin
Keyword(s):  
Cost Function ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Estimation ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Seismic Reflection Data ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Paraxial Ray ◽  
The Cost

We present a new method based on migration velocity analysis (MVA) to estimate 2‐D velocity models from seismic reflection data with no assumption on reflector geometry or the background velocity field. Classical approaches using picking on common image gathers (CIGs) must consider continuous events over the whole panel. This interpretive step may be difficult—particularly for applications on real data sets. We propose to overcome the limiting factor by considering locally coherent events. A locally coherent event can be defined whenever the imaged reflectivity locally shows lateral coherency at some location in the image cube. In the prestack depth‐migrated volume obtained for an a priori velocity model, locally coherent events are picked automatically, without interpretation, and are characterized by their positions and slopes (tangent to the event). Even a single locally coherent event has information on the unknown velocity model, carried by the value of the slope measured in the CIG. The velocity is estimated by minimizing these slopes. We first introduce the cost function and explain its physical meaning. The theoretical developments lead to two equivalent expressions of the cost function: one formulated in the depth‐migrated domain on locally coherent events in CIGs and the other in the time domain. We thus establish direct links between different methods devoted to velocity estimation: migration velocity analysis using locally coherent events and slope tomography. We finally explain how to compute the gradient of the cost function using paraxial ray tracing to update the velocity model. Our method provides smooth, inverted velocity models consistent with Kirchhoff‐type migration schemes and requires neither the introduction of interfaces nor the interpretation of continuous events. As for most automatic velocity analysis methods, careful preprocessing must be applied to remove coherent noise such as multiples.

Migration velocity analysis based on focusing diffractions generated using the CRS wavefront attributes: Application to real land data

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-50
Author(s):  
German Garabito ◽  
José Silas dos Santos Silva ◽  
Williams Lima
Keyword(s):  
Time Domain ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Normal Incidence ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
The Time Domain

In land seismic data processing, the prestack time migration (PSTM) image remains the standard imaging output, but a reliable migrated image of the subsurface depends on the accuracy of the migration velocity model. We have adopted two new algorithms for time-domain migration velocity analysis based on wavefield attributes of the common-reflection-surface (CRS) stack method. These attributes, extracted from multicoverage data, were successfully applied to build the velocity model in the depth domain through tomographic inversion of the normal-incidence-point (NIP) wave. However, there is no practical and reliable method for determining an accurate and geologically consistent time-migration velocity model from these CRS attributes. We introduce an interactive method to determine the migration velocity model in the time domain based on the application of NIP wave attributes and the CRS stacking operator for diffractions, to generate synthetic diffractions on the reflection events of the zero-offset (ZO) CRS stacked section. In the ZO data with diffractions, the poststack time migration (post-STM) is applied with a set of constant velocities, and the migration velocities are then selected through a focusing analysis of the simulated diffractions. We also introduce an algorithm to automatically calculate the migration velocity model from the CRS attributes picked for the main reflection events in the ZO data. We determine the precision of our diffraction focusing velocity analysis and the automatic velocity calculation algorithms using two synthetic models. We also applied them to real 2D land data with low quality and low fold to estimate the time-domain migration velocity model. The velocity models obtained through our methods were validated by applying them in the Kirchhoff PSTM of real data, in which the velocity model from the diffraction focusing analysis provided significant improvements in the quality of the migrated image compared to the legacy image and to the migrated image obtained using the automatically calculated velocity model.

Joint PP and PS plane-wave wave-equation migration-velocity analysis

Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. R507-R525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zongcai Feng ◽  
Bowen Guo ◽  
Lianjie Huang
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Plane Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Relative Depth ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis

Conventional joint PP and PS velocity analysis is based on ray tomography. We develop a joint PP and PS wave-equation migration-velocity-analysis method using plane-wave common-image gathers (CIGs) to produce accurate P- and S-wave velocity models. The objective function of our new method consists of three terms: The first and second terms penalize the moveout residuals computed from PP and PS plane-wave CIGs, respectively, and the third term constrains the nonzero relative depth shifts between the PP and PS migration images. The moveout of plane-wave CIGs is automatically picked using a semblance analysis method, and the relative depth shifts between the PP and PS images are automatically computed using dynamic warping or manually picking the depths of certain primary reflectors. The moveout residuals and the relative depth shifts are transformed into weighted image perturbations, and they are then projected into the velocity models to update the P- and S-wave velocity models using the scalar-wave equations and their linearized forms. Numerical tests with synthetic and multicomponent field data demonstrate that our method can simultaneously invert for accurate P- and S-wave velocity models for elastic migration.

Migration velocity analysis by double path-integral migration

Geophysics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. WCA225-WCA231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Schleicher ◽  
Jessé C. Costa
Keyword(s):  
Path Integral ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Quantitative Information ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Integral Imaging ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Velocity Information ◽  
Starting Model

The idea of path-integral imaging is to sum over the migrated images obtained for a set of migration velocity models. Velocities where common-image gathers align horizontally are stationary, thus favoring these images in the overall stack. The overall image forms with no knowledge of the true velocity model. However, the velocity information associated with the final image can be determined in the process. By executing the path-integral imaging twice and weighting one of the stacks with the velocity value, the stationary velocities that produce the final image can then be extracted by a division of the two images. The velocity extraction, interpola-tion, and smoothing can be done fully automatically, without the need for human interpretation or other intervention. A numerical example demonstrated that quantitative information about the migration velocity model can be determined by double path-integral migration. The so-obtained velocity model can then be used as a starting model for subsequent velocity analysis tools like migration velocity analysis or tomographic methods.

scholarly journals Joint migration velocity analysis of PP- and PS-waves for VTI media

Geophysics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. WC123-WC135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengfei Cai ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Grid Point ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
The North ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Vti Media

Combining PP-waves with mode-converted PS reflections in migration velocity analysis (MVA) can help build more accurate VTI (transversely isotropic with a vertical symmetry axis) velocity models. To avoid problems caused by the moveout asymmetry of PS-waves and take advantage of efficient MVA algorithms designed for pure modes, here we generate pure SS-reflections from PP and PS data using the [Formula: see text] method. Then the residual moveout in both PP and SS common-image gathers is minimized during iterative velocity updates. The model is divided into square cells, and the VTI parameters [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] are defined at each grid point. The objective function also includes the differences between the migrated depths of the same reflectors on the PP and SS sections. Synthetic examples confirm that 2D MVA of PP- and PS-waves may be able to resolve all four relevant parameters of VTI media if reflectors with at least two distinct dips are available. The algorithm is also successfully applied to a 2D line from 3D ocean-bottom seismic data acquired at Volve field in the North Sea. After the anisotropic velocity model has been estimated, accurate depth images can be obtained by migrating the recorded PP and PS data.

Subsalt velocity estimation by target-oriented wave-equation migration velocity analysis: A 3D field-data example

Geophysics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. U19-U29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaxun Tang ◽  
Biondo Biondi
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Field Data ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Estimation ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Generalized Born ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Recorded Data

We apply target-oriented wave-equation migration velocity analysis to a 3D field data set acquired from the Gulf of Mexico. Instead of using the original surface-recorded data set, we use a new data set synthesized specifically for velocity analysis to update subsalt velocities. The new data set is generated based on an initial unfocused target image and by a novel application of 3D generalized Born wavefield modeling, which correctly preserves velocity kinematics by modeling zero and nonzero subsurface-offset-domain images. The target-oriented inversion strategy drastically reduces the data size and the computation domain for 3D wave-equation migration velocity analysis, greatly improving its efficiency and flexibility. We apply differential semblance optimization (DSO) using the synthesized new data set to optimize subsalt velocities. The updated velocity model significantly improves the continuity of subsalt reflectors and yields flattened angle-domain common-image gathers.

Numeric implementation of wave-equation migration velocity analysis operators

Geophysics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. VE145-VE159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Sava ◽  
Ioan Vlad
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Estimation ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Image Optimization ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Zero Offset ◽  
Wavefield Extrapolation

Wave-equation migration velocity analysis (MVA) is a technique similar to wave-equation tomography because it is designed to update velocity models using information derived from full seismic wavefields. On the other hand, wave-equation MVA is similar to conventional, traveltime-based MVA because it derives the information used for model updates from properties of migrated images, e.g., focusing and moveout. The main motivation for using wave-equation MVA is derived from its consistency with the corresponding wave-equation migration, which makes this technique robust and capable of handling multipathing characterizing media with large and sharp velocity contrasts. The wave-equation MVA operators are constructed using linearizations of conventional wavefield extrapolation operators, assuming small perturbations relative to the background velocity model. Similar to typical wavefield extrapolation operators, the wave-equation MVA operators can be implemented in the mixed space-wavenumber domain using approximations of differentorders of accuracy. As for wave-equation migration, wave-equation MVA can be formulated in different imaging frameworks, depending on the type of data used and image optimization criteria. Examples of imaging frameworks correspond to zero-offset migration (designed for imaging based on focusing properties of the image), survey-sinking migration (designed for imaging based on moveout analysis using narrow-azimuth data), and shot-record migration (also designed for imaging based on moveout analysis, but using wide-azimuth data). The wave-equation MVA operators formulated for the various imaging frameworks are similar because they share elements derived from linearizations of the single square-root equation. Such operators represent the core of iterative velocity estimation based on diffraction focusing or semblance analysis, and their applicability in practice requires efficient and accurate implementation. This tutorial concentrates strictly on the numeric implementation of those operators and not on their use for iterative migration velocity analysis.

Migration velocity analysis using traveltime wavefield tomography

Geophysics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. U73-U85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saleh M. Al-Saleh ◽  
Jianwu Jiao
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Lateral Velocity ◽  
Traveltime Tomography ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Complex Structural

We introduce an integrated wave-equation technique for migration velocity analysis (MVA) that consists of three steps: (1) forming the extended data, (2) approximating the correct transmitted wavefield, and (3) using wavefield tomography to update the velocity model. In the first step, the crosscorrelation imaging condition is relaxed to produce other nonzero-lag common image gathers (CIG) that, combined, form a common image cube (CIC). Slicing the CIC at different crosscorrelation lags forms a series of CIGs. Flattened events will occur in the CIGs at a lag other than the zero-lag when an incorrect velocity model is used in the migration. In the second step, for each event on the CIG, we pick the focusing depth and crosscorrelation lag at which it is flattest. We then model a Green’s function by seeding a source at the focusing depth using one-way wave equation modeling, then shift the modeled wavefield with the focusing crosscorrelation lag. This process is repeated for the other primary events at different lateral and vertical positions. The result is a set of modeled data whose wavefield approximates the wavefield that would have been generated if the correct velocity model had been used to simulate these gathers. We then apply wavefield tomography on these data-driven modeled data to update the velocity model. Our inversion scheme is based on wave-equation traveltime tomography that can update the velocity model in the presence of large velocity errors and a complex environment. Tests on synthetic and real 2D seismic data confirm the method’s effectiveness in building velocity models in complex structural areas that have large lateral velocity variations.

Joint inversion of the reflectivity and the velocity model

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-68
Author(s):  
Alejandro Cabrales-Vargas ◽  
Rahul Sarkar ◽  
Biondo L. Biondi ◽  
Robert G. Clapp
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Field Data ◽  
Joint Inversion ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Background Model ◽  
Seismic Events ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis

During linearized waveform inversion, the presence of small inaccuracies in the background subsurface model can lead to unfocused seismic events in the final image. The effect on the amplitude can mislead the interpretation. We present a joint inversion scheme in the model domain of the reflectivity and the background velocity model. The idea is to unify the inversion of the background and the reflectivity model into a single framework instead of treating them as decoupled problems. We show that with this method, we can obtain a better estimate of the reflectivity than that obtained with conventional linearized waveform inversion. Conversely, the background model is improved by the joint inversion with the reflectivity in comparison with wave-equation migration velocity analysis. We perform tests on 2D synthetics and 3D field data that demonstrate both benefits.

Time-migration velocity analysis by image-wave propagation of common-image gathers

Geophysics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. VE161-VE171 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Schleicher ◽  
J. C. Costa ◽  
A. Novais
Keyword(s):  
Wave Propagation ◽  
Seismic Event ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Reference Velocity ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Velocity Image ◽  
The Common

Image-wave propagation or velocity continuation describes the variation of the migrated position of a seismic event as a function of migration velocity. Image-wave propagation in the common-image gather (CIG) domain can be combined with residual-moveout analysis for iterative migration velocity analysis (MVA). Velocity continuation of CIGs leads to a detection of those velocities in which events flatten. Although image-wave continuation is based on the assumption of a constant migration velocity, the procedure can be applied in inhomogeneous media. For this purpose, CIGs obtained by migration with an inhomogeneous macrovelocity model are continued starting from a constant reference velocity. The interpretation of continued CIGs, as if they were obtained from residual migrations, leads to a correction formula that translates residual flattening velocities into absolute time-migration velocities. In this way, the migration velocity model can be improved iteratively until a satisfactory result is reached. With a numerical example, we found that MVA with iterative image continuation applied exclusively to selected CIGs can construct a reasonable migration velocity model from scratch, without the need to build an initial model from a previous conventional normal-moveout/dip-moveout velocity analysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document