Seismic Interferometry Applied to Seismic Background-Noise Field Data

Author(s):  
Deyan Draganov ◽  
Kees Wapenaar ◽  
Wim Mulder ◽  
Johannes Singer ◽  
Arie Verdel
2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deyan Draganov ◽  
Kees Wapenaar ◽  
Wim Mulder ◽  
Johannes Singer

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1094-1115
Author(s):  
Haitao Cao ◽  
Roohollah Askari

Abstract Ambient noise seismic interferometry performed by cross-correlation has been proven to be a potential cost-effective technique for geological studies. To improve the resolution of images created by interferometry, additional techniques using deconvolution and cross-coherence have been introduced. While all three methods have previously been evaluated using surface wave data for shear-wave imaging of the near surface, comparatively little study has been devoted to assess the three methods for the retrieval of body waves in reflection surveys for time-lapse application. Moreover, although the application of seismic interferometry to CO2 sequestration by cross-correlation has been investigated by many researchers, to our knowledge, similar time-lapse studies have not been conducted using deconvolution and cross-coherence methods. We evaluate the three methods of cross-correlation, deconvolution and cross-coherence for the retrieval of phase information contained in virtual seismic records by applying seismic interferometry to synthetic data, using a model reservoir before and after CO2 injection. By examining two approaches of regularization and smoothing factors to suppress spurious reflection events observed on the deconvolution and cross-coherence results, we note that both approaches provide similar results. We investigate noise effects by adding random noise independently at each geophone. Finally, we apply these techniques to field data recorded near the CO2 storage site in Ketzin, Germany. For both our numerical and field data studies, we find that the cross-coherence technique retrieves the phase information of body-wave data more effectively than the cross-correlation and deconvolution techniques, and is less sensitive to uncorrelated noise from shallow sources.


2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deyan Draganov ◽  
Kees Wapenaar ◽  
Wim Mulder ◽  
Johannes Singer ◽  
Arie Verdel

Geophysics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. SA19-SA34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shohei Minato ◽  
Toshifumi Matsuoka ◽  
Takeshi Tsuji ◽  
Deyan Draganov ◽  
Jürg Hunziker ◽  
...  

Crosswell reflection method is a high-resolution seismic imaging method that uses recordings between boreholes. The need for downhole sources is a restrictive factor in its application, for example, to time-lapse surveys. An alternative is to use surface sources in combination with seismic interferometry. Seismic interferometry (SI) could retrieve the reflection response at one of the boreholes as if from a source inside the other borehole. We investigate the applicability of SI for the retrieval of the reflection response between two boreholes using numerically modeled field data. We compare two SI approaches — crosscorrelation (CC) and multidimensional deconvolution (MDD). SI by MDD is less sensitive to underillumination from the source distribution, but requires inversion of the recordings at one of the receiver arrays from all the available sources. We find that the inversion problem is ill-posed, and propose to stabilize it using singular-value decomposition. The results show that the reflections from deep boundaries are retrieved very well using both the CC and MDD methods. Furthermore, the MDD results exhibit more realistic amplitudes than those from the CC method for downgoing reflections from shallow boundaries. We find that the results retrieved from the application of both methods to field data agree well with crosswell seismic-reflection data using borehole sources and with the logged P-wave velocity.


2008 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takao Aizawa ◽  
Yoshiaki Yamanaka ◽  
Shunichiro Ito ◽  
Toshinori Kimura ◽  
Kyosuke Onishi ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 1507-1515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell M. Withers ◽  
Richard C. Aster ◽  
Christopher J. Young ◽  
Eric P. Chael

Abstract We used a deep (1500 m) cased borehole near the town of Datil in west-central New Mexico to study high-frequency (>1 Hz) seismic noise characteristics. The remote site had very low levels of cultural noise, but strong winds (winter and spring) made the site an excellent candidate to study the effects of wind noise on seismograms. Along with a three-component set of surface sensors (Teledyne Geotech GS-13), a vertical borehole seismometer (GS-28) was deployed at a variety of depths (5, 43, and 85 m) to investigate signal and noise variations. Wind speed was measured with an anemometer. Event-triggered and time-triggered data streams were recorded on a RefTek 72-02 data acquisition system located at the site. Our data show little cultural noise and a strong correlation between wind speed and seismic background noise. The minimum wind speed at which the seismic background noise appears to be influenced varies with depth: 3 m/sec at the surface, 3.5 m/sec at 43 m in depth, and 4 m/sec at 85 m in depth. For wind speed below 3 to 4 m/sec, we observe omni-directional background noise that is coherent at frequencies below 15 Hz. This coherence is destroyed when wind speeds exceed 3 to 4 m/sec. We use a test event (Md ∼ 1.6) and superimposed noise to investigate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvement with sensor depth. For the low Q valley fill of the Datil borehole (DBH) site, we have found that SNR can be improved by as much as 20 to 40 dB between 23 and 55 Hz and 10 to 20 dB between 10 and 20 Hz, by deploying at a 43-m depth rather than at the surface. At the surface, there is little signal above noise in the 23- to 55-Hz frequency band for wind speeds greater than 8 m/sec. Thus, high-frequency signal information that is lost at the surface can be recorded by deploying at the relatively shallow depth of 40 m. Because we observe only minor further reductions in seismic background noise (SBN) at deeper depths, 40 m is likely to be a reasonable deployment depth for other high-frequency-monitoring sites in similar environmental and geologic conditions.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Almagro Vidal ◽  
Joost van der Neut ◽  
Deyan Draganov ◽  
Guy Drijkoningen ◽  
Kees Wapenaar
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document