Introduction to this special section: Borehole geophysics

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 832-832
Author(s):  
Sarah Coyle ◽  
Jesús M. Salazar ◽  
Kyle T. Spikes

When borehole geophysics technologies and applications come to mind, often we think of vertical seismic profiles (VSPs), checkshots, or wireline logging measurements. Problems that have been addressed include resolution enhancement, coverage, illumination, and time-to-depth conversion, among others. The papers in this special section, however, extend these relatively well-known techniques to include salt proximity work, use of high-pressure and ultrahigh-pressure geophones in VSPs, distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), acoustic wellbore ranging, refinement of velocity models and image enhancement, and impacts on business value. Although all the papers could have been about, for example, DAS or vertical resolution improvements, this special section turned out to be broader in terms of the application of borehole geophysics. What drives the need for borehole geophysics in these applications? Is it the significance of business value? Is it scientific and engineering knowledge? Is it some combination thereof? The answers to those questions are not addressed directly, but each paper is unique and offers useful results and techniques across many disciplines. This special section is not extensive in terms of the number of papers, but those included are well worth reading.

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 462-463
Author(s):  
David H. Johnston

The papers submitted to this special section demonstrate that the topic of reservoir monitoring is extremely diverse. This diversity is reflected in the wide range of geologic settings covered by these papers — deepwater unconsolidated clastics, more cemented sandstones in onshore fields, and carbonates. Diversity is seen in the range of production scenarios described by these papers — water sweep of oil and gas, thermal recovery using steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD), and enhanced recovery using CO2 injection. Moreover, the papers in this section cover much more than time-lapse 3D seismic. Although about half of the submitted papers use 4D surface seismic data to monitor reservoirs, the remainder cover a diversity of methods that include time-lapse vertical seismic profiles (VSPs), repeat well logging using distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), and muon tomography. Even the concept of the “reservoir” is expanded to include monitoring microseismicity that might result from production activity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 471-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Kiyashchenko ◽  
Albena Mateeva ◽  
Yuting Duan ◽  
Duane Johnson ◽  
Jonathan Pugh ◽  
...  

Time-lapse monitoring using 3D distributed acoustic sensing vertical seismic profiles (DAS VSPs) is rapidly maturing as a nonintrusive low-cost solution for target-oriented monitoring in deep water. In a Gulf of Mexico field, DAS fibers deployed in active wells enable detailed tracking of the water flood in two deep reservoirs. Multiple tests in adverse well conditions let us understand the impact of source size and other factors on the spatially dependent quality of time-lapse DAS data and prove that excellent image repeatability is achievable under typical field conditions. Frequent repeat surveys allowed us to predict the timing of water arrival in a producer and to observe new water injection patterns that are important for understanding water-flood performance. Going forward, DAS 4D monitoring is envisioned as a tool that can assist with proactive wells and reservoir management, new well planning, and reservoir model updates.


2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 689-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Malinverno ◽  
W. Scott Leaney

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-35
Author(s):  
M. Javad Khoshnavaz

Building an accurate velocity model plays a vital role in routine seismic imaging workflows. Normal-moveout-based seismic velocity analysis is a popular method to make the velocity models. However, traditional velocity analysis methodologies are not generally capable of handling amplitude variations across moveout curves, specifically polarity reversals caused by amplitude-versus-offset anomalies. I present a normal-moveout-based velocity analysis approach that circumvents this shortcoming by modifying the conventional semblance function to include polarity and amplitude correction terms computed using correlation coefficients of seismic traces in the velocity analysis scanning window with a reference trace. Thus, the proposed workflow is suitable for any class of amplitude-versus-offset effects. The approach is demonstrated to four synthetic data examples of different conditions and a field data consisting a common-midpoint gather. Lateral resolution enhancement using the proposed workflow is evaluated by comparison between the results from the workflow and the results obtained by the application of conventional semblance and three semblance-based velocity analysis algorithms developed to circumvent the challenges associated with amplitude variations across moveout curves, caused by seismic attenuation and class II amplitude-versus-offset anomalies. According to the obtained results, the proposed workflow is superior to all the presented workflows in handling such anomalies.


1996 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 524-529
Author(s):  
Hayrullah Karabulut ◽  
John F. Ferguson

Abstract An extension of the boundary integral method for SH waves is given for transversely isotropic media. The accuracy of the method is demonstrated for a simple flat interface problem by comparison to the Cagniard-de Hoop solution. The method is further demonstrated for a case with interface topography for both surface and vertical seismic profiles. The new method is found to be both accurate and effective.


First Break ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Cassell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document