scholarly journals Listen to hard topics with soft ears - domestic violence and family carer; a survey of referrals to a MHIDD forensic mental health service in Ireland

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S320-S321
Author(s):  
Mohamed Elhassan Elamin ◽  
Anthony Kearns ◽  
Aidan Cooney

AimsA number of studies sought to explore and define families needs, experiences and concerns associated with being a carer for a detained person and their interaction with Forensic services (McKeown et al, 1995, MacInnes et al, 2002, Tsang et al, 2002, Absalom et al, 2012 Horberg et al, 2015).Relatives can be victims of the service user's offence (Ferriter & Huband, 2003, Tsang et al 2002), and may even blame the service user for their behaviour (Barrowclough et al., 2005). Service user becomes violent and aggressive family members are less likely to be motivated to participate, due to the service user's behaviour (MacInnes, 2000).An initial domestic violence survey of in-patient case files found that in 66%of the patients files, there were reported incidents of domestic violence in family caring relationships prior to the index offence and subsequent admission to NFMHS (Cooney, 2018).MethodA quantitative methodology was used. A domestic violence survey of referrals was conducted of 100 referrals to the National Forensic Mental Health Services – Mental Health and Intellectual & Development Disability Services between 2016-2019.Result22% of the referrals reported Domestic Violence in the family care-giving relationships.The father was recorded as the parent to be experience most Domestic Violence; 40%. Other family members who experienced domestic violence ranged from the mother 32%, brother 12% and sister 8%. Other family members were 8%.100% of the referrals did not report the domestic violence in the carer relationships, nor did referring agencies recorded safeguarding adults concerns.ConclusionThe findings from this audit raises a couple of clinical, legal and safeguarding adults work in National Forensic Mental Health Services with regards to family work. Firstly, the need to (re)conceptualising family work in the context of trauma informed care. Secondly, family work should offer some families, who are victim of crime, a restorative approach. Thirdly, safeguarding adults will need to consider complex caring relationships and acknowledged this as part of care planning and support.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darryl Maybery ◽  
Irene Casey Jaffe ◽  
Rose Cuff ◽  
Zoe Duncan ◽  
Anne Grant ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Substantial and important benefits flow to all stakeholders, including the service user, when mental health services meaningfully engage with carers and family members. Government policies around the world clearly supports inclusiveness however health service engagement with family and carers remains sporadic, possibly because how best to engage is unclear. A synthesis of currently used surveys, relevant research and audit tools indicates seven core ways that families and carers might be engaged by health services. This study sought to confirm, from the perspective of family and carers, the importance of these seven health service engagement practices. Methods In a mixed method online survey, 134 family members and carers were asked what they received and what they wanted from mental health services. Participants also quantified the importance of each of the seven core practices on a 0–100 point likert scale. Results Almost 250 verbatim responses were deductively matched against the seven themes, with additional unaligned responses inductively categorised. The findings triangulate with multiple diverse literatures to confirm seven fundamental engagement practices that carers and family want from health services. Conceptually, the seven practices are represented by two broad overarching practice themes of (i) meeting the needs of the family member and (ii) addressing the needs of the service user. Conclusion Policy, clinical practice, training and future research might encompass the seven core practices along with consideration of the intertwined relationship of family, carers and the service user suggested by the two broader concepts.


2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Simmons ◽  
Chris J. Hawley ◽  
Tim M. Gale ◽  
Thanusha Sivakumaran

Aims and methodTo determine which terms receivers of mental health services wish to be known by (service user, patient, client, user, survivor) according to the professional consulted (psychiatrist, nurse, psychologist, social worker, occupational therapist). We conducted a questionnaire study to assess terms by like or dislike and by rank order. There were 336 participants from local catchment area secondary care community and in-patient settings in east Hertfordshire.ResultsPatient is the preferred term when consulted by psychiatrists and nurses, but it is equally preferable to client for social workers and occupational therapists. Service user is disliked more than liked overall, particularly by those who consulted a health professional, but not by those who consulted a social worker. A significant minority wish to be regarded as a survivor or user.Clinical implicationsNational and local mental health services should adopt evidence-based terminology in referring to ‘patient’ or, in some groups, ‘patient or client’ in preference to ‘service user’.


2021 ◽  
pp. 002580242110669
Author(s):  
Howard Ryland ◽  
Louise Davies ◽  
Jeremy Kenney-Herbert ◽  
Michael Kingham ◽  
Mayura Deshpande

Forensic mental health services in high income countries are typically high cost and low volume, providing care to people with mental illness, personality disorders, learning disability and autism deemed to pose a risk to others. Research into how forensic mental health services work as a whole system is limited. Such research is urgently needed to guide policy makers and ensure that services operate effectively.


Author(s):  
Ian Cummins

This chapter begins with a discussion of the development of the service user movement within mental health. It emphasises the importance of service user perspectives before going on to examine a range of contemporary concerns within services.


1991 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Fein ◽  
Kenneth L. Appelbaum ◽  
Richard Barnum ◽  
Prudence Baxter ◽  
Thomas Grisso ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document