scholarly journals Evidence into practice

2002 ◽  
Vol 181 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupatharshini Chilvers ◽  
Glynn Harrison ◽  
Attila Sipos ◽  
Madeline Barley

Psychiatrists have long recognised that routine clinical practice needs to be shaped and informed by external evidence (Lewis, 1958). Psychiatric researchers were among the first to utilise multi-centre randomised controlled trials (demonstrating the effectiveness of antipsychotics), and psychologists were among the first in the health field to develop techniques of meta-analysis. Social workers, too, point to their tradition with the publication of one of the earliest controlled trials (Lehrman, 1949).

2002 ◽  
Vol 181 (02) ◽  
pp. 99-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupatharshini Chilvers ◽  
Glynn Harrison ◽  
Attila Sipos ◽  
Madeline Barley

Psychiatrists have long recognised that routine clinical practice needs to be shaped and informed by external evidence (Lewis, 1958). Psychiatric researchers were among the first to utilise multi-centre randomised controlled trials (demonstrating the effectiveness of antipsychotics), and psychologists were among the first in the health field to develop techniques of meta-analysis. Social workers, too, point to their tradition with the publication of one of the earliest controlled trials (Lehrman, 1949).


2009 ◽  
Vol 194 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Parker

SummaryA recent meta-analysis concluded that newer antidepressant drugs are equivalent to or no better than placebos, a conclusion at some variance with their commonly judged clinical effectiveness. The ‘disconnect’ between randomised controlled trials and clinical practice would benefit from dissection of contributing factors, and redressing limitations to current trial procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document