Presidential Address delivered at the Annual Meeting of the Medico-Psychological Association, July 25, 1889

1889 ◽  
Vol 35 (151) ◽  
pp. 293-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Hayes Newington

Gentlemen,—I have chosen as the subject of this address a question which, though it is almost as old as the present system of treating the insane, has been revivified with so much vigour as to demand at our hands the close attention which we should feel bound to give to it had it been entirely new. I am about to offer you some remarks on what is called “Hospital treatment for recent and curable cases of insanity.” The reintroduction of this question is undoubtedly due to the necessity for the consideration of the great increase of the insane population; and it is appropriate in point of time; indeed, the time has been determined by the change in the composition of those bodies whose sanction and help are required for any new departure in this direction.

1950 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-252
Author(s):  
G. V. Bayley

With these words Sir George Maddex, in his Presidential Address, directed our attention to the present system of taxation of annuity funds. M. E. Ogborn, on 27 October 1947, touched on the subject of uneven incidence of tax upon differing funds, and some uneasiness about the consequences was manifest in the discussion on that paper.‘Income tax is another subject on which it is difficult for me to speak freely, but I cannot refrain from noting that the general taxation position, as it now affects life assurance and pensions business, has given rise to serious anomalies: ...one has only to consider... that the terms quoted by offices for the purchase of life annuities vary to a quite remarkable extent, depending on the distribution of the company's business between various funds, as it exists at the moment, and the consequential incidence of tax;...’


1937 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
F. M. Powickk

On previous occasions I have chosen as the subject of my address at the annual meeting of this Society a historical theme suggested by my studies. Three historical addresses, each of which involved careful preparation, are, I venture to think, as many as a President of the Society need feel it his duty to deliver. Yet I think that I should have inflicted a fourth upon the Society if some special considerations had not combined to divert me from what is certainly the safer, and is perhaps the more profitable course. Moreover, it so happens that the period of my presidency has been a time of significant development in the organisation of historical study in this country. The history of this Society has been affected by the general movement. We have tried deliberately to adjust ourselves to it, and to take a leading part in it. I decided, therefore, to make my last appearance in the chair an occasion for a review of current developments and for some reflections upon them.


1951 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 65-85
Author(s):  
G. V. Bayley

‘Income tax is another subject on which it is difficult for me to speak freely, but I cannot refrain from noting that the general taxation position, as it now affects life assurance and pensions business, has given rise to serious anomalies: …one has only to consider…that the terms quoted by offices for the purchase of life annuities vary to a quite remarkable extent, depending on the distribution of the company's business between various funds, as it exists at the moment, and the consequential incidence of tax;…’(J.I.A.Vol.LXXV, p. 7.)With these words Sir George Maddex, in his Presidential Address, directed our attention to the present system of taxation of annuity funds. M. E. Ogborn (1), on 27 October 1947, touched on the subject of uneven incidence of tax upon differing funds, and some uneasiness about the consequences was manifest in the discussion on that paper.Much has been written in recent years upon the general subject of taxation of annuities. S. J. Rowland and F. H. Wales (2), A. H. Shrewsbury (3), and M. E. Ogborn (1) have fully described and commented upon the present method. Relatively little attention, however, has been devoted to the effects of the system upon annuity funds, probably because it is only recently that we have become aware of its full implications. There is some need therefore to review the consequences and to investigate more closely the actuarial problems which follow.It is proposed here to analyse the effects of the system and, proceeding from some simple basic principles, to point to a method of solution of the actuarial problems connected with valuation, investment and the terms for new business and withdrawals.


1929 ◽  
Vol 75 (311) ◽  
pp. 573-583
Author(s):  
Nathan Raw

The subject of my address is one of immense importance to the community, and of particular concern to a very large number of individuals.


1991 ◽  
Vol 30 (4I) ◽  
pp. 337-365
Author(s):  
Syed Nawab Haider Naqvi

After 40 years of its birth, development economics has come to be widely accepted - without universal acclaim. In sharp contrast to some pessimistic evaluations of the subject, the academic community has granted it the right to a separate existence. But the recognition has not come easy. From the first full-length evaluation of the discipline by Chenery (1965), in which he looks at it as a variation on the classical theme of comparative advantage, to Stem's (1989) sympathetic review of the contributions that the discipline has made to the state of economic knowledge, development economics has experienced many a vicissitude - both the laurels of glory and the "arrows of outrageous fortune". But, finally, it has become an industry in its own right, of which not only social profitability but also 'private' profitability appears to be strictly positive: the publishing industry continues to patronize it and publish full-length books on the subject. Four decades of development experience, the production of massive cross-country and time-series data about a large number of development variables, the construction of large macro-economic models and fast-running computers, and the application of mathematical methods, have all combined to lay the foundations of a theoretically rigorous and policy-relevant development paradigm, which is gradually replacing the old one. All this is good news for development economists, who can now afford not only bread but also some butter for their daily parsnips .


1974 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Charles Issawi

Anything coming after the floor show we have just seen can only be an anticlimax, and my impulse is to tear up my prepared text and just quote two great men: Thomas Carlyle, who described economics as “the dismal science” and Henry Ford, who said “history is bunk” — from which it presumably follows that economic history is dismal bunk. Instead, I should like to take advantage of this captive audience and speak to you in praise of economic history. This is an old Arabic genre : mahasin al-iqtisad. And of course economic history means giving as little history for as much money as possible, so you will not expect a long speech.


1896 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 279-283
Author(s):  
A. H. Kirkland

At the eighth annual meeting of the Association of Economic Entomologists, held at Buffalo, August 21st and 22nd, 1896, a part of one session was devoted to the consideration of the work of exterminating the gypsy moth in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The subject was presented for discussion by the President, Prof. C. H. Fernald, at the morning session of the second day. Prof. Fernald referred to the action of the Association at its Springfield (1895) meeting, and stated that at the legislative hearings of the past spring, held with reference to determining the size of the appropriation to be granted for continuing the work of exterminating the gypsy moth, no representations made by the Gypsy Moth Committee, the Director, or himself, carried a fraction of the weight that the endorsement of the Association afforded. The legislators recognized the Association as a body of eminent scientists, and accordingly valued the opinion of its members.


1894 ◽  
Vol 40 (171) ◽  
pp. 487-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conolly Norman

Gentlemen,—My first and most pleasing duty in taking this chair is to thank you very warmly for the honour you have done me in placing me here. Recalling the names of those who have occupied this position before me, I am abashed by my sense of my own unworthiness to fill it. When the question of my nomination as President of this Association was mooted, I would fain have stood aside, but the kindly representations of those members who said that it was Ireland's turn for an Annual Meeting made me feel that I could not evade the honourable task which was put upon me, even though I feel that I am very far from being the fittest of my contemporaries to undertake it. I have also been moved to accept your kindness and the distinguished honour you have conferred upon me in the hope that a meeting might be arranged in Dublin in such a way as to further the objects of the Association and to be of advantage to the members, particularly to those who live in Ireland. How far this hope may be fulfilled remains to be seen. I trust, in any case, that our present meeting may be so far successful that all our future Annual Meetings may be working meetings, and that under successors, I hope more competent than myself, the Association may be thereby materially aided in its forward path. For this meeting we have, I am happy to say, a very large and comprehensive programme, the members having heartily seconded the efforts of the General Secretary and myself to bring in good material. I desire no credit for this. I may say, with Montaigne, “I have brought you here a nosegay of sweet flowers; nothing is mine but the string that ties them together.” It is, perhaps, the function of the Chairman of such a meeting as this rather to aid and to suggest discussion than himself to take a very prominent part therein; rather to offer opportunities for others than to make them for himself; rather to be the whetstone than the chisel—


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document