Ischemia-modified Albumin (IMA) Is Useful in Risk Stratification of Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 555-b-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. V Pollack
2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Laureano-Phillips ◽  
Richard D. Robinson ◽  
Subhash Aryal ◽  
Somer Blair ◽  
Damalia Wilson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 16-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan Liu ◽  
Janson Cheng Ji Ng ◽  
Chu En Ting ◽  
Jeffrey Tadashi Sakamoto ◽  
Andrew Fu Wah Ho ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan Liu ◽  
Marcel Lucas Chee ◽  
Zhi Xiong Koh ◽  
Su Li Leow ◽  
Andrew Fu Wah Ho ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Chest pain is among the most common presenting complaints in the emergency department (ED). Swift and accurate risk stratification of chest pain patients in the ED may improve patient outcomes and reduce unnecessary costs. Traditional logistic regression with stepwise variable selection has been used to build risk prediction models for ED chest pain patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate if machine learning dimensionality reduction methods can improve performance in deriving risk stratification models. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of patients > 20 years old who presented to the ED of Singapore General Hospital with chest pain between September 2010 and July 2015. Variables used included demographics, medical history, laboratory findings, heart rate variability (HRV), and heart rate n-variability (HRnV) parameters calculated from five to six-minute electrocardiograms (ECGs). The primary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which included death, acute myocardial infarction, and revascularization within 30 days of ED presentation. We used eight machine learning dimensionality reduction methods and logistic regression to create different prediction models. We further excluded cardiac troponin from candidate variables and derived a separate set of models to evaluate the performance of models without using laboratory tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration analysis was used to compare model performance. Results Seven hundred ninety-five patients were included in the analysis, of which 247 (31%) met the primary outcome of 30-day MACE. Patients with MACE were older and more likely to be male. All eight dimensionality reduction methods achieved comparable performance with the traditional stepwise variable selection; The multidimensional scaling algorithm performed the best with an area under the curve of 0.901. All prediction models generated in this study outperformed several existing clinical scores in ROC analysis. Conclusions Dimensionality reduction models showed marginal value in improving the prediction of 30-day MACE for ED chest pain patients. Moreover, they are black box models, making them difficult to explain and interpret in clinical practice.


2006 ◽  
Vol 365 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 93-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi Ordóñez-Llanos ◽  
Miquel Santaló-Bel ◽  
Javier Mercé-Muntañola ◽  
Paul O. Collinson ◽  
David Gaze ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Hamilton ◽  
Leslie A. Swales ◽  
Johanne Neill ◽  
John C. Murphy ◽  
Karen M. Darragh ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 2948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Kavsak ◽  
Joshua O. Cerasuolo ◽  
Shawn E. Mondoux ◽  
Jonathan Sherbino ◽  
Jinhui Ma ◽  
...  

For patients with chest pain who are deemed clinically to be low risk and discharged home from the emergency department (ED), it is unclear whether further laboratory tests can improve risk stratification. Here, we investigated the utility of a clinical chemistry score (CCS), which comprises plasma glucose, the estimated glomerular filtration rate, and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (I or T) to generate a common score for risk stratification. In a cohort of 14,676 chest pain patients in the province of Ontario, Canada and who were discharged home from the ED (November 2012–February 2013 and April 2013–September 2015) we evaluated the CCS as a risk stratification tool for all-cause mortality, plus hospitalization for myocardial infarction or unstable angina (primary outcome) at 30, 90, and 365 days post-discharge using Cox proportional hazard models. At 30 days the primary outcome occurred in 0.3% of patients with a CCS < 2 (n = 6404), 0.9% of patients with a CCS = 2 (n = 4336), and 2.3% of patients with a CCS > 2 (n = 3936) (p < 0.001). At 90 days, patients with CCS < 2 (median age = 52y (IQR = 46–60), 59.4% female) had an adjusted HR = 0.51 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.32–0.82) for the composite outcome and patients with a CCS > 2 (median age = 74y (IQR = 64–82), 48.0% female) had an adjusted HR = 2.80 (95%CI = 1.98–3.97). At 365 days, 1.3%, 3.4%, and 11.1% of patients with a CCS < 2, 2, or >2 respectively, had the composite outcome (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the CCS can risk stratify chest pain patients discharged home from the ED and identifies both low- and high-risk patients who may warrant different medical care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document