Treatment of estrogen receptor-negative or hormonally refractory breast cancer with double high-dose chemotherapy intensification and bone marrow support.

1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 1207-1216 ◽  
Author(s):  
F R Dunphy ◽  
G Spitzer ◽  
A U Buzdar ◽  
G N Hortobagyi ◽  
L J Horwitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iv Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Negative

We have used high-dose therapy followed by randomization to receive or not receive autologous bone marrow infusion in 58 stage IV breast cancer patients (all were estrogen receptor-negative [ER-] or primary hormonal refractory). Patients received a median of four courses of induction chemotherapy and if stable or responding received two courses of intensive therapy with cyclophosphamide 4.5 to 5.25 g/m2, etoposide 750 to 1,200 mg/m2, and cisplatin 120 to 180 mg/m2 (CVP). The complete remission (CR) rate after completion of the induction and intensive phases was 55%. Median progression-free interval from induction is 57 weeks with a projected 2-year progression-free survival of approximately 25%. Six of seven patients followed for greater than 2 years are still progression-free. Three favorable features predicted for improved progression-free survival are the following: (1) absent liver involvement, (2) absent soft tissue involvement, and (3) less than or equal to two disease sites (P values of .001, .013, and .048, respectively). Hormonal and menopausal status did not predict for progression-free survival. Major toxicities were infectious secondary to neutropenia, with a 93% incidence of fever and a 38% incidence of sepsis. The treatment-related mortality rate was 9%, with three infectious, one coronary, and one late hemorrhage-related death of unknown cause. Longer follow-up is still needed to truly evaluate the possibility of long-term disease-free survival, but further studies of this approach to high-dose intensification in poor prognostic groups of stage IV breast cancer appear warranted.

AMEERA-5: A randomized, double-blind phase III study of amcenestrant (SAR439859) + palbociclib versus letrozole + palbociclib for previously untreated ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1104-TPS1104
Author(s):  
Aditya Bardia ◽  
Javier Cortes ◽  
Sara A. Hurvitz ◽  
Suzette Delaloge ◽  
Hiroji Iwata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii Study

TPS1104 Background: Selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) block estrogen receptor (ER) associated signaling and have created interest for treating patients (pts) with advanced ER+ breast cancer (BC). Fulvestrant is currently the only SERD available for advanced BC but requires intramuscular administration, limiting the applied dose, exposure and receptor engagement. Amcenestrant (SAR439859) is an oral SERD that binds with high affinity to both wild-type and mutant ER, blocking estradiol binding and promoting up to 98% ER degradation in preclinical studies. In the phase I AMEERA-1 study of pretreated pts with ER+/HER2- advanced BC, amcenestrant 150–600 mg once daily (QD) showed a mean ER occupancy of 94% with plasma concentrations > 100 ng/mL and a favorable safety profile (Bardia, 2019; data on file). Combination therapy with amcenestrant + palbociclib (palbo) was also evaluated as part of this ongoing phase I study. CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with an aromatase inhibitor (AI), the gold standard for first line treatment for advanced breast cancer, prolong progression free survival (PFS) in pts with no prior treatment for ER+/HER2- advanced BC, but OS benefit has not been shown yet in postmenopausal pts. There remains a clinical need for more effective treatments in this setting. Methods: AMEERA-5 (NCT04478266) is an ongoing, prospective, randomized, double-blind phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of amcenestrant + palbo with that of letrozole + palbo in pts with advanced, locoregional recurrent or metastatic ER+/HER2- BC who have not received prior systemic therapy for advanced disease. The study includes men, pre/peri-menopausal (with goserelin) and post-menopausal women. Pts with progression during or within 12 months of (neo)adjuvant endocrine therapy using any of the following agents are excluded: AI, selective estrogen receptor modulators, CDK4/6i. Pts are randomized 1:1 to either continuous amcenestrant 200 mg or letrozole 2.5 mg QD orally with matching placebos; both combined with palbo 125 mg QD orally (d1–21 every 28-d cycle). Randomization is stratified according to disease type (de novo metastatic vs recurrent disease), the presence of visceral metastasis, and menopausal status. The primary endpoint is investigator assessed progression free survival (PFS) (RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints are overall survival, PFS2, objective response rate, duration of response, clinical benefit rate, pharmacokinetics of amcenestrant and palbo, health-related quality of life, time to chemotherapy, and safety. Biomarkers will be measured in paired tumor biopsies and cell free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA) over time. Target enrolment = 1066 pts; enrolment as of 1/2021 = 33 pts. Bardia A, et al., J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37 (15 suppl):1054 Clinical trial information: NCT04478266 .

scholarly journals Difficulty Diagnosing a Brain Tumor during Clinical Maintenance of a Complete Response to anti-HER2 Treatments for Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Case Report

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1311-1316
Author(s):  
Ryoko Semba ◽  
Yoshiya Horimoto ◽  
Atsushi Arakawa ◽  
Yoko Edahiro ◽  
Tomoiku Takaku ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Stage Iv Breast Cancer ◽  
The Right

A 46-year-old woman with erythema of the right breast presented to our hospital and was diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer (HER2-positive invasive ductal carcinoma). She received 4 courses of anthracycline-based regimens and 4 courses of trastuzumab + pertuzumab + docetaxel (Tmab + Pmab + DTX). Since she responded well to these therapies, only Tmab + Pmab was continued thereafter. Twenty-three months after starting treatment, she developed a headache. A tumor was identified in the right temporal lobe. Craniotomy was performed for definitive diagnosis. Intraoperative pathological assessment suggested the tumor to be brain metastasis of breast cancer. However, the final pathological diagnosis was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of central nervous system (DLBCL-CNS) based on re-assessment with immunohistochemical examinations. Therefore, the Tmab + Pmab was discontinued, and 6 courses of high-dose methotrexate therapy were administered. This case highlights the importance of considering rare entities, such as DLBCL, when diagnosing a solitary brain tumor in a patient with a primary cancer, based on imaging and pathological findings.

Myeloablative therapy and unpurged autologous bone marrow transplantation for poor-prognosis neuroblastoma: report of 34 cases.

1991 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 962-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Dini ◽  
E Lanino ◽  
A Garaventa ◽  
D Rogers ◽  
S Dallorso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Bone Marrow Transplantation ◽  
Marrow Transplantation ◽  
Partial Remission ◽  
Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Bone Marrow ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Bone

From October 1984 to November 1987, 34 patients aged from 1 year 1 month to 7 years 7 months with resistant or relapsed neuroblastoma (NB) (group 1, 10 patients), unselected disseminated NB (group 2, 14 patients), or selected disseminated NB (group 3, 10 patients) received myeloablative therapy (MAT) followed by unpurged autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) at the end of an intensive protocol, which included high-dose chemotherapy and surgery to the primary tumor. Median time from diagnosis to MAT and ABMT was 6 months (5 months from last relapse to MAT and ABMT in the relapsed patients). The MAT regimen included vincristine, fractionated total body irradiation (TBI), and melphalan. Seventeen patients were grafted in complete remission (CR), five in very good partial remission (VGPR), 10 in partial remission (PR), and two in progressive disease (PD). The acute toxic death rate was 2.9%. The overall progression-free survival was 29%. The median progression-free survival was 20 months for the 17 patients grafted in CR, 6 months for the five patients grafted in VGPR, and 12 months for the 10 patients grafted in PR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document