Randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as infection prophylaxis in oncologic surgery. Leukine Surgical Prophylaxis Research Group.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 1167-1173 ◽  
Author(s):  
N J Meropol ◽  
D E Wood ◽  
J Nemunaitis ◽  
N J Petrelli ◽  
B J Lipman ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Postoperative infections are a frequent source of preventable morbidity and mortality in the oncologic population. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a potent modulator of immune effector cells in vitro and in vivo. This study was conducted to determine whether GM-CSF, when administered perioperatively, could reduce the incidence of surgical infections in cancer patients. METHODS This was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Cancer patients at high risk of infectious surgical morbidity were randomized to receive GM-CSF 125 microg/m2 per day or placebo subcutaneously for 8 days beginning 3 days preoperatively. Routine antibiotic prophylaxis was administered to all patients. RESULTS Three hundred ninety-nine patients were enrolled, with 198 randomized to receive GM-CSF. Twenty-one percent of patients experienced infections during the first 2 weeks postoperatively, and there was no difference in infection rate between the study groups. The most common sites of infection were respiratory tract (53%) and surgical wound (25%). The duration of operation and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status classification were the most significant predictors of infection in multivariate analysis. GM-CSF was well tolerated and was not associated with fever. CONCLUSION The eligibility criteria for this study were successful at defining a patient subgroup at high risk for postoperative infections. At an immunomodulatory dose of 125 microg/m2 per day, GM-CSF was safe and well tolerated, but did not reduce the incidence of postoperative infections in this high-risk oncologic population. Infectious morbidity in surgical oncology remains an important subject for continued clinical investigation.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 2930-2936 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Ravaud ◽  
C Chevreau ◽  
L Cany ◽  
P Houyau ◽  
N Dohollou ◽  
...  

PURPOSE A randomized unblinded phase III trial was designed to determine the ability of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to accelerate recovery from febrile neutropenia induced by chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 68 patients with febrile neutropenia following chemotherapy defined as axillary temperature greater than 38 degrees C and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less than 1 x 10(9)/L were included. After stratification for high- and low-risk chemotherapy to induce febrile neutropenia, treatment was randomized between GM-CSF at 5 microg/kg/d or control, both being associated with antibiotics. RESULTS GM-CSF significantly reduced the median duration of neutropenia from 6 to 3 days for ANC less than 1 x 10(9)/L(P < .001) and from 4 to 3 days for ANC less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L (P=.024), days of hospitalization required for febrile neutropenia, and duration of antibiotics during hospitalization. The greatest benefit with GM-CSF appeared for patients who had received low-risk chemotherapy, for which the median duration of ANC less than 1 x 10(9)/L was reduced from 7 to 2.5 days (P < .001) and from 4 to 2 days for ANC less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L (P=.0011), the duration of hospitalization during the study from 7 to 4 days (P=.003), and the duration on antibiotics during hospitalization from 7 to 3.5 days (P < .001). A multivariate analysis, using Cox regression, showed that variables predictive for recovery from neutropenia were GM-CSF (P=.0010) and time interval between the first day of chemotherapy and randomization (P=.030). There was no benefit for GM-CSF when high-risk chemotherapy was considered. CONCLUSION GM-CSF significantly shortened duration of neutropenia, duration of neutropenic fever-related hospitalization, and duration on antibiotics during hospitalization when febrile neutropenia occurred after low-risk chemotherapy, but not high-risk chemotherapy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (34) ◽  
pp. 4066-4076 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Lawson ◽  
Sandra Lee ◽  
Fengmin Zhao ◽  
Ahmad A. Tarhini ◽  
Kim A. Margolin ◽  
...  

Purpose We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and peptide vaccination (PV) on relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with resected high-risk melanoma. Patients and Methods Patients with completely resected stage IV or high-risk stage III melanoma were grouped by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) -A2 status. HLA-A2–positive patients were randomly assigned to receive GM-CSF, PV, both, or placebo; HLA-A2–negative patients, GM-CSF or placebo. Treatment lasted for 1 year or until recurrence. Efficacy analyses were conducted in the intent-to-treat population. Results A total of 815 patients were enrolled. There were no significant improvements in OS (stratified log-rank P = .528; hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% repeated CI, 0.77 to 1.15) or RFS (P = .131; hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.04) in the patients assigned to GM-CSF (n = 408) versus those assigned to placebo (n = 407). The median OS times with GM-CSF versus placebo treatments were 69.6 months (95% CI, 53.4 to 83.5 months) versus 59.3 months (95% CI, 44.4 to 77.3 months); the 5-year OS probability rates were 52.3% (95% CI, 47.3% to 57.1%) versus 49.4% (95% CI, 44.3% to 54.3%), respectively. The median RFS times with GM-CSF versus placebo were 11.4 months (95% CI, 9.4 to 14.8 months) versus 8.8 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 11.2 months); the 5-year RFS probability rates were 31.2% (95% CI, 26.7% to 35.9%) versus 27.0% (95% CI, 22.7% to 31.5%), respectively. Exploratory analyses showed a trend toward improved OS in GM-CSF–treated patients with resected visceral metastases. When survival in HLA-A2–positive patients who received PV versus placebo was compared, RFS and OS were not significantly different. Treatment-related grade 3 or greater adverse events were similar between GM-CSF and placebo groups. Conclusion Neither adjuvant GM-CSF nor PV significantly improved RFS or OS in patients with high-risk resected melanoma. Exploratory analyses suggest that GM-CSF may be beneficial in patients with resected visceral metastases; this observation requires prospective validation.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (19) ◽  
pp. 3235-3241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adil I. Daud ◽  
Noweeda Mirza ◽  
Brianna Lenox ◽  
Stephanie Andrews ◽  
Patricia Urbas ◽  
...  

Purpose Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) can induce differentiation of dendritic cells (DCs) in preclinical models. We hypothesized that GM-CSF–stimulated DC differentiation may result in clinical benefit in patients with high-risk melanoma. Patients and Methods We conducted a prospective trial in patients with high-risk (stage III B/C, IV), resected melanoma, with GM-CSF 125 μg/m2/d administered for 14 days every 28 days. Patients underwent clinical restaging every four cycles, with DC analysis performed at baseline and at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Results Of 42 patients enrolled, 39 were assessable for clinical outcome and DC analysis. Median overall survival was 65 months (95% CI, 43 to 67 months) and recurrence-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI, 3 to 11 months). GM-CSF treatment caused an increase in mature DCs, first identified after 2 weeks of treatment, normalizing by 4 weeks. Patients with decreased DCs at baseline had significant increases in DC number and function compared with those with “normal” parameters at baseline. No change was observed in the number of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Early recurrence (< 90 days) correlated with a decreased effect of GM-CSF on host DCs, compared with late or no (evidence of) recurrence. Conclusion GM-CSF treatment was associated with a transient increase in mature DCs, but not MDSCs. Greater increase of DCs was associated with remission or delayed recurrence. The prolonged overall survival observed warrants further exploration.


2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (21) ◽  
pp. 4313-4318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramesh K. Ramanathan ◽  
Douglas M. Potter ◽  
Chandra P. Belani ◽  
Samuel A. Jacobs ◽  
Stefan Gravenstein ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To determine whether granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) would improve response to influenza vaccination in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a randomized, patient-blinded, placebo-controlled trial carried out in 1997 to 2000, 133 patients were stratified into five groups of treatment and disease. Single doses of standard split trivalent influenza vaccine and either placebo or 250 μg of GM-CSF were administered at the same time. Hemagglutination inhibition assay titers were measured before and 4 weeks after vaccination. RESULTS: Standard analyses, which define response as at least a four-fold increase in titers, detect no effect of GM-CSF for any of the three influenza subtypes in the trivalent vaccines (P ≥ .12). Analysis that includes the magnitude of the change in titers and combines responses of the subtypes suggests that the placebo group had the greater response (P = .051), thus indicating that GM-CSF does not improve response. Ancillary analyses show that response declines both with increasing age and with higher initial titers. The fraction of patients with at least a four-fold increase in titers was 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.29 to 0.42) CONCLUSION: A single 250-μg dose of GM-CSF administered with the influenza vaccine does not improve response to vaccination. Response in cancer patients is low and declines as age and initial titer increase.


1996 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theofanis Economopoulos ◽  
Efstathios Papageorgiou ◽  
Nicholas Stathakis ◽  
Maria Constantinidou ◽  
Agapi Parharidou ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document