Patient Preferences Versus Physician Perceptions of Treatment Decisions in Cancer Care

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 2883-2885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Bruera ◽  
Catherine Sweeney ◽  
Kathryn Calder ◽  
Lynn Palmer ◽  
Suzanne Benisch-Tolley

PURPOSE: To examine patient preferences as well as physician perceptions of these preferences for decision making and communication in palliative care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical decision-making preferences (DMPs) were prospectively studied in 78 assessable cancer patients after initial assessment at a palliative care outpatient clinic. DMPs were assessed with a questionnaire using five possible choices ranging from 1 (patient prefers to make the treatment decision) to 5 (patient prefers the physician to make the decision). In addition, the physician’s perception of this preference was assessed. RESULTS: Full concordance between the physician and the patient was seen in 30 (38%) of 78 cases; when the five original categories were recombined to cover active, shared, and passive decision making, there was concordance in 35 (45%) of 78 cases. The kappa coefficient for agreement between physician and patient was poor at 0.14 (95% confidence limit, −0.01 to 0.30) for simple kappa and 0.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00 to 0.34) for weighted kappa (calculated on the three regrouped categories). Active, shared, and passive DMPs were chosen by 16 (20%) of 78, 49 (63%) of 78, and 13 (17%) of 78 patients, and by 23 (29%) of 78, 30 (39%) of 78, and 25 (32%) of 78 physicians, respectively. The majority of patients (49 [63%] of 78; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.74) preferred a shared approach with physicians. Physicians predicted that patients preferred a less shared approach than they in fact did. Patient age or sex did not significantly alter DMP. CONCLUSION: An individual approach is needed and each patient should be assessed prospectively for DMP.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 20-20
Author(s):  
Suepattra G. May ◽  
Katharine Rendle ◽  
Meghan Halley ◽  
Nicole Ventre ◽  
Allison W. Kurian ◽  
...  

20 Background: Shared medical decision making (SDM) has been lauded by advocates for its potential to democratize the patient-physician relationship. However, the practice of SDM is still conceived of as largely a dyadic moment that exists between the patient and the physician. Few studies have looked at the role of significant others (spouses, partners, family members and friends) in decision making or considered how discussions and actions outside the consultation room affect a patient’s medical decisions. This prospective study investigated the impact of significant others on the decision making deliberations of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Methods: Forty-one newly diagnosed breast cancer patients were interviewed at four critical time points throughout treatment to explore how they deliberated decisions with both care providers and significant others. Surveys assessing HRQOL, role preferences and treatment satisfaction along with EHR abstraction augmented interview data. Grounded theory analysis was used to identify recurrent themes in the qualitative data, and survey data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20. Results: Emergent themes from our analysis identified several factors that patients consider when faced with cancer treatment decisions, including 1) presentation of treatment options 2) patient or significant other conflict/concordance with care team recommendations 3) perceived risk of recurrence and 4) short and long term impact of treatment on daily life. Participants stressed the need for clinicians to view patients beyond diagnosis and recognize their larger care network as influential factors in their decision making. Conclusions: Our interviews highlight how the current healthcare delivery structure rarely acknowledges the circles of care that can exert influence on decision making. Lack of attention to non-clinical others can lead to sub-optimal medical decision making because these influences are not adequately understood by clinicians. Findings from this study suggest the need to enhance clinicians’ and researchers’ understanding of the influence of others in patients’ treatment decision making, enabling them to intervene in these practices.


Medical Care ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj K. Arora ◽  
Colleen A. McHorney

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 135-135
Author(s):  
Rafael Alonso Saldana ◽  
Eliza Park ◽  
Devon Check ◽  
Katherine Elizabeth Reeder-Hayes ◽  
Deborah Mayer

135 Background: Hispanics are the fastest growing demographic group in the United States and cancer is the leading cause of death in this population. Hispanic immigrants encounter a number of challenges when confronting end-of-life care: geographical and cultural separation from families; language and educational barriers; fear of discrimination; and in the case of undocumented immigrants, fear of deportation. The experiences of Hispanic patients with advanced cancer who are parents of dependent-age children are essentially unknown. Therefore, we used qualitative methods to identify the palliative care and end-of-life needs of this unique population. Methods: We recruited five Spanish-speaking, Hispanic mothers with metastatic cancer to complete a semi-structured interview about their experiences. The interviews addressed coping with advanced illness, sources of distress, parenting changes, medical decision-making strategies, and communication about illness. Data were analyzed using traditional content analysis techniques. Results: Participants were all female, ages 34-43 year old. On average, they had 3.4 children and 8.2 years of education. Common themes were: (1) the financial burden of cancer; (2) low social support for parenting and household responsibilities; (3) lack of perceived role in medical decision-making; (4) and religion as primary source of coping and hope. We also identified several communication barriers in conducting a palliative care study with this population. Conclusions: Future palliative care studies can improve Spanish-speaking Hispanics’ comprehension by incorporating Spanish vocabulary into the interviews and providing greater explanation of concepts such as shared decision-making, cancer staging, palliative care, and hospice. Greater awareness of financial concerns and insufficient social support may help oncology providers and researchers develop interventions to help Hispanic parents with advanced cancer. Further studies are needed to learn more about the unmet needs of end-of-life care for this demographic group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document