Phase II Study of Temozolomide Plus Thalidomide for the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 3351-3356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Jen Hwu ◽  
Susan E. Krown ◽  
Jennifer H. Menell ◽  
Katherine S. Panageas ◽  
Janene Merrell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Metastatic Sites

Purpose: To further investigate the efficacy and safety of temozolomide plus thalidomide in patients with metastatic melanoma without brain metastases. Patients and Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed advanced-stage metastatic melanoma were enrolled in an open-label, phase II study. The primary end point was response rate. Patients received temozolomide (75 mg/m2/d × 6 weeks with a 2-week rest between cycles) plus concomitant thalidomide (200 mg/d with dose escalation to 400 mg/d for patients < 70 years old, or 100 mg/d with dose escalation to 250 mg/d for patients ≥ 70 years old). Treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred. Results: Thirty-eight patients (median age, 62 years) with stage IV (three patients with M1a, eight with M1b, and 26 with M1c) or stage IIIc (one patient) melanoma and a median of four metastatic sites were enrolled, and received a median of two cycles of therapy. Twelve patients (32%) had an objective tumor response, including one with an ongoing complete response of 25+ months’ duration and 11 with partial responses. Five patients achieving partial response with a more than 90% reduction of disease were converted to a complete response with surgery. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Median survival was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval, 6.05 to 19.38 months), with a median follow-up among survivors of 24.3 months. Conclusion: The combination of temozolomide plus thalidomide seems to be a promising and well-tolerated oral regimen for metastatic melanoma that merits further study.

A Phase II Study of Intravenous Azacitidine Alone in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes NCT00384956.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1451-1451
Author(s):  
Richard Walgren ◽  
Crystal Dao ◽  
Frederieke Kreisel ◽  
Peter Westervelt ◽  
Camille Abboud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Subsequent Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Erythroid Response

Abstract Rationale: 5-Azacytidine (Aza), a DNA hypomethylating agent, has now been shown in 2 clinical trials involving high-risk MDS patients to provide a survival benefit over supportive/conventional care regimens. While one phase II study used a continuous 7-day IV infusion, Aza was administered subcutaneously (SQ) in most pre-approval studies. However, injection site reactions are not uncommon with SQ dosing, especially in thrombocytopenic patients. Aza given as a short intravenous (IV) infusion is anticipated to be efficacious from pharmacokinetic profiling and is FDA approved, but prospective efficacy data for short IV infusion are lacking. Study aim and design: To determine the efficacy of IV Aza when given as a short infusion, we have undertaken an open-label, single-arm, single-center phase II study of Aza in patients with MDS, either de novo or secondary, defined by FAB classification. Previously treated subjects were ineligible if they had already received Aza or decitabine. Treatment consisted of Aza 75 mg/m2 given as a 20 minute IV infusion once daily on Days 1–5 of a 28-day cycle. Response was evaluated by IWG 2000 criteria. After two cycles at the 75 mg/m2 dose, patients failing to achieve a CR were eligible for an increased dose of 100 mg/m2. After 6 cycles of therapy, patients must have demonstrated at least a hematologic improvement to continue on study. Study endpoints include determination of the complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates, and secondary endpoints examined the rates of hematological improvement, time to progression, and cytogenetic response. Results: Accrual began 8/17/06 with a target of 21 subjects. As of 7/31/07, 15 subjects have accrued with a median follow-up of 77 days (range 4 to 246). Subjects consisted of 9 males and 6 females with a median age of 69.6 yr (range 53 to 82). The median time from diagnosis is 213 days (range 0 days to 4 yr). By FAB criteria, subjects consist of 4 RA, 9 RAEB, 1 RAEB-t, and 1 CMML, and subjects are categorized by IPSS risk as 1 Low, 4 Int-1, and 10 Int-2. Two patients had therapy related MDS. The data remain preliminary with subjects having completed a mean of 3 cycles (range 1 to 6). None of the 5 subjects who have completed at least 4 cycles of therapy have achieved a CR. However, 2 (40%) of these subjects achieved a PR. Additionally, 1 (20%) patient had a major erythroid response, while another had a minor erythroid response. Median time to response was 2 months. Ten subjects remain on study, 1 patient withdrew due to progressive disease (in first week of therapy), and 4 deaths have occurred on study (2 due to sepsis, 1 each due to pneumonia and acute MI). No deaths were attributed to study drug. Common adverse events include nausea, emesis, and hematologic toxicities. Grade 2–3 nausea and grade 2–3 emesis each occurred in 5 subjects. Observed grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included: anemia (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=4), leukopenia (n=3), neutropenia (n=7), and febrile neutropenia (n=1). Hematologic toxicities have resulted in transient treatment delays (&lt; 4 weeks) and dose reduction, but hematologic toxicities have not prevented subsequent treatment on study. Conclusions: Although follow-up is short for assessment of efficacy, this is the first prospective study to report on efficacy and toxicity of short infusional Aza in the treatment of MDS.

Capecitabine (X) compared to X + erlotinib (E) as first-line treatment in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Interim efficacy results from a randomized phase II study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14560-14560 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Vincent ◽  
I. Kerr ◽  
B. Dingle ◽  
M. J. MacKenzie ◽  
M. Sanatani
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dry Eyes ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

14560 Background: The oral fluoropyrimidine X (Xeloda®) has efficacy, safety and convenience benefits vs. 5-FU/LV in adjuvant / first-line CRC. E (Tarceva®) inhibits epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which predicts poor prognosis. A randomized open-label phase II study was performed to establish activity of X alone vs. X + E (XE) in first-line. Methods: Pts (ECOG PS 0–2 and/or elevated LDH) with MCRC not eligible for immediate surgical metastatectomy and unwilling/unable to undergo combination chemotherapy were randomized to X (1000mg/m2/d bid d1–14 q3w) or XE (X 1000mg/m2/d bid d1–14 q3w + E 150mg/d). A third arm (E alone) was included but dropped after 13 pts, following safety committee review of progressions at first CT scan. Primary endpoint: time to progression (TTP). Results: 59 pts (median age 65y, range 46–84; 44 M, 15 F) have been accrued (X=21; XE=25; E=13). Mean time on study: 3.8 months (range 0.2–12). 9 pts are on active treatment, 21 pts on follow-up and 29 pts have died. Interim efficacy results are available for 50 pts (X n=15; XE n=22, E n=13). There were no significant differences in response rate, median TTP (4.9 vs. 9.2 months) and median overall survival (18.2 vs. 15.1 months) for X vs. XE. Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) with X were diarrhea, nausea, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), angina, dyspnea (all 5%). Corresponding rates of grade 3 AEs with XE were diarrhea (20%), fatigue (16%), stomatitis (12%), HFS (8%), vomiting (8%), dehydration (8%), thrombosis, weight loss, decreased appetite, dry eyes, headache, anxiety, abdominal pain, anorexia, hyponatremia (all 4%). The only grade 4 AEs were skin rash (4%) and subjective weakness (4%) - both XE. Conclusions: Interim results indicate that XE is at least as effective as X alone in first-line MCRC. Recruitment is continuing and further follow-up may help fully determine the potential benefits of adding E to X. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A single-arm, open-label, phase II study to evaluate the safety of vemurafenib (VEM) followed by ipilimumab (IPI) in BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma (MM).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9032-9032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asim Amin ◽  
David H. Lawson ◽  
April K. Salama ◽  
Henry B. Koon ◽  
Troy H. Guthrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase

Phase II study of short CHOP-rituximab combination with early consolidation with ibritumomab-tiuxetan-Y90 (IT-Y90) in non-pretreated patients age 65 to 80 with CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6633-6633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic Peyrade ◽  
Gerard Lepeu ◽  
Jocelyn Gal ◽  
Christophe Fruchart ◽  
Diane Coso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomised Study ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Pretreated Patients

6633 Background: IT-Y90was approved in follicular lymphoma, and some data indicates that it could be used in DLBCL. It has been reported that early TEP-TDM negativity is associated with a longer survival in DLBCL, which suggest that these patients could benefit of a less intensive protocol. Methods: We conducted an international, open-label, phase II non-randomised study, in patients aged between 65 and 80 with age-adjusted (aa) IPI score of 0 and 1 and CD20+ DLBCL. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of 3 cycles of RCHOP14 followed by, in case of complete response (CR), an injection of IT-Y90. Results: Thirty patients (M/F= 1) were included. Median age was 72.6 years (range 65 - 80). Patients had a stage III/IV, elevated LDH and IPI=1 in 38%, 16.6 and 57% respectively. 25 patients received the full treatment. Five obtained an uncomplete FDG-PET response and were excluded after 2 RCHOP cycles. 23 patients received the full IT-Y90 dosage (0.4mCi/Kg) and two received the attenuated dosage (0.3mCi/Kg). Mean treatment time was 54 days (median 52; min 48-max 69). The CR rate after RCHOP treatment was 85% [95% CI: 65-94]. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Grade III-IV neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was observed in 45% and 4%, respectively. Five patients experienced at least one febrile neutropenia. After IT-Y90, mean duration time for platelets <50G/l was 2.08 weeks (median 2; min 0-max 5). Two patients required platelet transfusion. With a median follow-up of 29.5 months [95% CI: 23-39], the estimated 3-year PFS was 90% [95% CI: 80-100] and the 3-year OS was 100% [95% CI: 100-100]. Among patients treated with 90Y-IT, only 3 relapsed were recorded (at 6, 16 and 24 months). Conclusions: this study suggested the feasibility, and efficacy of a short regimen including one injection of IT-Y90for selected DLBCL in complete response after 3 cycles of RCHOP14. This results need to be confirmed by further studies.

Long-term analyses from L-MIND, a phase II study of tafasitamab (MOR208) combined with lenalidomide (LEN) in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7513-7513
Author(s):  
Johannes Düll ◽  
Kami J. Maddocks ◽  
Eva Gonzalez-Barca ◽  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
Anna Marina Liberati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Efficacy Analysis

7513 Background: L-MIND (NCT02399085) is an ongoing, open-label, Phase II study of tafasitamab (MOR208), an Fc-modified, humanized, anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody, plus LEN in ASCT-ineligible patients (pts) with R/R DLBCL. Primary analyses and 2-year efficacy results were previously presented; we report an updated efficacy analysis with ≥35 months follow up (cut-off: October 30, 2020). Methods: Pts were aged ≥18 years with ASCT-ineligible R/R DLBCL, had 1–3 prior systemic therapies (Tx), including ≥1 CD20-targeting regimen, with an ECOG status of 0–2. Pts received 28-day cycles (C) of tafasitamab (12 mg/kg IV), once weekly during C1–3, with a loading dose on Day 4 of C1, then every 2 weeks (Q2W) during C4–12. LEN (25 mg PO) was administered on Days 1–21 of C1–12. After C12, progression-free pts received tafasitamab Q2W until disease progression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), assessed by IRC. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Eighty of 81 enrolled pts received tafasitamab + LEN and were included in the full analysis set (1 prior Tx, n=40; 2+ prior Tx, n=40). At data cut-off, the overall ORR was 57.5% (n=46/80), including complete response (CR) in 40% of pts (n=32/80) and partial response (PR) in 17.5% of pts (n=14/80) (Table). Kaplan-Meier estimates: median DoR=43.9 months (95% CI: 26.1–not reached [NR]), and NR in pts who achieved a CR (95% CI: 43.9–NR); median PFS=11.6 months (95% CI: 6.3–45.7), with median follow-up 33.9 months; median OS=33.5 months (95% CI: 18.3–NR), with median follow-up 42.7 months. There were no unexpected toxicities or new safety signals. Conclusions: Combination Tx with tafasitamab + LEN followed by tafasitamab monotherapy provided durable responses in pts with R/R DLBCL not eligible for ASCT, with a manageable safety profile. These long-term data indicate the potential of tafasitamab + LEN followed by extended tafasitamab monotherapy in achieving prolonged remission and survival benefit in this patient population, especially at first relapse. Clinical trial information: NCT02399085. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document