Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Vincristine, Ifosfamide, and Doxorubicin With Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Support in Children and Adolescents With Advanced-Stage Nonrhabdomyosarcomatous Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Pediatric Oncology Group Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (18) ◽  
pp. 4031-4038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto S. Pappo ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
Jessee Jenkins ◽  
Bhaskar Rao ◽  
Robert Marcus ◽  
...  

Purpose To describe the response rate and survival of children and adolescents with unresected or metastatic nonrhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) treated with vincristine, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin. Patients and Methods Between September 1996 and June 2000, 39 eligible patients received vincristine (1.5 mg/m2 weekly for 13 doses), ifosfamide (3 g/m2 daily for 3 days every 3 weeks for seven cycles), doxorubicin (30 mg/m2 daily for 2 days for six cycles), and mesna (750 mg/m2 for four doses after ifosfamide). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered daily (5 μg/kg) after each cycle of chemotherapy. Radiotherapy was administered from weeks 7 through 12. Results The median patient age at diagnosis was 11.7 years; the most common primary tumor site was lower extremity (36%); and synovial sarcoma was the predominant histology. More than three fourths of all tumors were 5 cm or greater at their largest diameters. The overall objective combined partial and complete response rate was 41% (95% CI, 25.7% to 56.7%). The estimated 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates (± standard deviation) for eligible patients were 59% ± 8.2% and 43.6% ± 7%, respectively. Patients with clinical group III disease had significantly better 3-year and progression-free survival rates compared with patients who presented with metastatic disease. Conclusion The vincristine, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin regimen was moderately active against pediatric NRSTS. Patients with synovial sarcoma had higher response rates than other patients, and patients with unresected disease had improved outcomes. Patients with metastatic disease continue to fare poorly, and newer approaches are indicated for these patients.

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110386
Author(s):  
Angela Chen ◽  
Vincent H Ha ◽  
Sunita Ghosh ◽  
Carole R Chambers ◽  
Michael B Sawyer

Introduction The metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma clinical trial (MPACT) trial established gemcitabine (gem) and nab-paclitaxel (nab) as a standard treatment for pancreatic cancer utilizing granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to manage neutropenia. This was a challenge for jurisdictions that do not use granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in palliative settings. We developed dosage guidelines to dose modify gem and nab without granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. We undertook a retrospective review to determine the efficacy and safety of these dose adjustment guidelines in the real world. Methods A multi-centered, retrospective chart review was performed on pancreatic patients between December 1, 2014, and August 21, 2018. Provincial electronic medical health records were reviewed. Using Log-rank statistics we determined the patient's progression-free survival and overall survival. Results Of 248 patients, 209 met patient selection criteria. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up, on gem alone prior to nab/gem combination therapy or did not receive nab or gem. Patients who received nab/gem as first-line therapy had a median progression-free survival of 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.1–7.4), and median overall survival of 11.1 months (95% CI, 9.5–12.8). Those who received gem/nab in the second line had a median progression-free survival of 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.8–6.5), and median overall survival of 19.3 months (95% CI, 12.6–26.0). Conclusions The patient’s progression-free survival and overall survival taking nab/gem using our dose modification algorithm were equivalent or superior to the MPACT trial's progression-free survival and overall survival. Gem/nab can be given by our dose modification scheme without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.


1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
W P Steward ◽  
J Verweij ◽  
R Somers ◽  
D Spooner ◽  
P Kerbrat ◽  
...  

PURPOSE This study was designed to test the feasibility of administering doxorubicin at an optimal dose-intensity (> 70 mg/m2 per 21 days) in combination with ifosfamide under recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) cover in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred four eligible patients (of 111 entered) in 16 centers received doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 plus ifosfamide 5 g/m2 every 3 weeks for up to seven cycles. rhGM-CSF (250 micrograms/m2) was administered once or twice daily by subcutaneous injections for up to 14 days between cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS Full protocol dose-intensity of chemotherapy was administered to the majority of patients with only 15 of 293 cycles being complicated by febrile episodes that required hospitalization. There were two treatment-related deaths: one from septicemia and one from cardiac failure. The main toxicities attributed to rhGM-CSF were pruritus and rash. A 45% response rate (10% complete remission [CR]) was seen, with a median response duration of 9 months and median survival of 15 months. CONCLUSION This high-dose regimen of chemotherapy was feasible under rhGM-CSF cover and produced a higher response rate and median survival than previously seen by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Soft Tissue Sarcoma Group. A randomized phase III study is now underway comparing this regimen with conventional-dose doxorubicin/ifosfamide to test the dose-response relationship.


2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 2638-2646 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. N. Sternberg ◽  
P. H.M. de Mulder ◽  
J. H. Schornagel ◽  
C. Théodore ◽  
S. D. Fossa ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: This randomized trial evaluated antitumor activity of and survival asociated with high–dose-intensity chemotherapy with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (HD-MVAC) versus MVAC in patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 263 patients with metastatic or advanced TCC who had no prior chemotherapy were randomized to HD-MVAC (2-week cycles) or MVAC (4-week cycles). RESULTS: Using an intent-to-treat analysis, at a median follow-up of 38 months, on the HD-MVAC arm there were 28 complete responses (CRs) (21%) and 55 partial responses (PRs) (41%), for an overall response of 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54% to 70%). On the MVAC arm, there were 12 CRs (9%) and 53 PRs (41%), for an overall response of 50% (95% CI, 42% to 59%). The P value for the difference in CR rate was .009; and for the overall response, it was .06. There was no statistically significant difference in survival (P = .122) or time to progression (P = .114). Progression-free survival was significantly better with HD-MVAC (P=.037; hazard ratio .75; 95% CI .58 to .98). The median progression-free survival time was 9.1 months on the HD-MVAC arm versus 8.2 months on the MVAC arm. The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 24.7% for HD-MVAC (95% CI, 17.1% to 32.3%) versus 11.6% for MVAC (95% CI, 5.9% to 17.4%). CONCLUSION: With HD-MVAC, it was possible to deliver twice the doses of cisplatin and doxorubicin in half the time, with fewer dose delays and less toxicity. Although a 50% difference in median overall survival was not detected, a benefit was observed in progression-free survival, CR rates, and overall response rates with HD-MVAC.


Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre de Nonneville ◽  
Dominique Barbolosi ◽  
Maeva Andriantsoa ◽  
Raouf El-Cheikh ◽  
Florence Duffaud ◽  
...  

Introduction: Based on a mathematical model of trabectedin-induced neutropenia, we assessed the predictive value of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) on progression-free survival (PFS) in an independent validation cohort of patients treated with trabectedin. Methods: We collected data from 87 patients in two expert centers who received at least two cycles of trabectedin for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) treatment. Correlations between ANC, patients’ characteristics, and survival were assessed, and a multivariate model including tumor grade, performance status, ANC, and hemoglobin level was developed. Results: Therapeutic ANC ≥ 7.5 G/L level was associated with shorter PFS: 3.22 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.57–4.87) in patients with ANC ≥ 7.5 G/L vs. 5.78 months (95% CI, 3.95–7.61) in patients with ANC < 7.5 G/L (p = 0.009). Age, primary localization, lung metastases, dose reduction, hemoglobin, and albumin rates were also associated with PFS. In multivariate analysis, ANC ≥ 7.5 G/L was independently associated with poor PFS and overall survival. Conclusion: We validated increased pre-therapeutic ANC as a predictive factor of short PFS in patients starting trabectedin for STS. ANC appears to have an impact on survival rates and may be used as a decision-making tool for personalizing second-line strategies in patients with metastatic STS.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyao Feng ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Aomei Li ◽  
Han Zhou ◽  
Xixu Zhu ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundSoft tissue sarcoma(STS) is a malignant tumor of highly heterogeneous mesenchymal origin. STS has a biologic pattern and clinical transformation with localized invasive growth and susceptibility to hematogenous metastasis. Metastatic and recurrent soft tissue sarcoma may be treated by local therapeutic options, including surgery and radiation therapy. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of SBRT for metastatic and recurrent soft tissue sarcoma.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 37 STS patients with 58 lesions treated with SBRT from 2009-2019 at our institution. We analyze the local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity rates of the patients.ResultThe median follow-up was 20 months(range 2 to 120 months). One and two year LC rates were 75.3% and 55.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 20–25 months]. Median OS was 24 months and the survival rates were 66.6%, 45% and 26.6% at 1, 2 and 3-year after SBRT. Median PFS were 11months (95% CI 8–18 months). No acute or chronic grade ≥ 3 toxicity was observed.ConclusionsIn patients with metastatic and recurrent STS, LC, OS and PFS were higher than expected. SBRT should be a proper treatment option for STS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isalira Peroba Rezende Ramos ◽  
Marlon Lemos Dias ◽  
Alan Cesar Nunes De Moraes ◽  
Fernanda Guimarães Meireles Ferreira ◽  
Sergio Augusto Lopes Souza ◽  
...  

Radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) remains a major problem resulting from radiotherapy. In this scenario, immunotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) arises as an attractive approach that might improve the injured liver. Here, we investigated G-CSF administration’s impact before and after liver irradiation exposure using an association of alcohol consumption and local irradiation to induce liver disease model in C57BL/6 mice. Male and female mice were submitted to a previous alcohol-induced liver injury protocol with water containing 5% alcohol for 90 days. Then, the animals were treated with G-CSF (100 μg/kg/d) for 3 days before or after liver irradiation (18 Gy). At days 7, 30, and 60 post-radiation, non-invasive liver images were acquired by ultrasonography, magnetic resonance, and computed tomography. Biochemical and histological evaluations were performed to verify whether G-CSF could prevent liver tissue damage or reverse the acute liver injury. Our data showed that the treatment with G-CSF before irradiation effectively improved morphofunctional parameters caused by RILD, restoring histological arrangement, promoting liver regeneration, preserving normal organelles distribution, and glycogen granules. The amount of OV-6 and F4/80-positive cells increased, and α-SMA positive cells’ presence was normalized. Additionally, prior G-CSF administration preserved serum biochemical parameters and increased the survival rates (100%). On the other hand, after irradiation, the treatment showed a slight improvement in survival rates (79%) and did not ameliorate RILD. Overall, our data suggest that G-CSF administration before radiation might be an immunotherapeutic alternative to radiotherapy planning to avoid RILD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document