Oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and folinic acid as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14155-14155 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Choi ◽  
K. Lee ◽  
D. Oh ◽  
J. Kim ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
...  

14155 Background: We investigated the efficacy and safety of an oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients (≥65 yr of age) with histologically confirmed, locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic gastric cancer were studied. Chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 and FA 100 mg/m2 (2-hour intravenous infusion), then 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 (46-hour continuous infusion) every 14 days. Results: A total of 24 patients were enrolled between September 2003 and July 2005. Of 22 evaluable patients, none achieved complete response (CR) and 11 achieved partial response (PR), resulting in an overall response rate of 50%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.4 months (95% CI: 5.1–5.8 months) and median overall survival (OS) was 7.4 months (95% CI: 4.4–10.4 months). The main toxicities were anemia and leucopenia, which were observed in 39.8% and 19.0%, respectively, of the total cycles administered. There were 2 cycles of grade 4 leucopenia and febrile neutropenia was not observed. Conclusions: This oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA regimen shows good efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4237-4237
Author(s):  
D. Santini ◽  
F. Graziano ◽  
V. Catalano ◽  
M. Di Seri ◽  
E. Testa ◽  
...  

Chemotherapy ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Jun Xiang ◽  
Ling Zhang ◽  
Feng Qiu ◽  
Feng Yu ◽  
Zheng Yu Zhan ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15175-e15175
Author(s):  
Nuriye Özdemir ◽  
Sercan Aksoy ◽  
Tulay Eren ◽  
Huseyin Abali ◽  
Omur Berna Oksuzoglu ◽  
...  

e15175 Background: Docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5FU (DCF) has been shown to be an effective regimen for metastatic gastric carcinomas. However, treatment-related adverse events is quite high with original dose DCF. We evaluated the outcomes of the metastatic gastric carcinomas who treated with modified dose DCF (mDCF) in our institution. Methods: A single institution retrospective review of patients with metastatic gastric cancer treated with three weekly mDCF from 1/2006 to 1/2013 was evaluated. Over this time period a standard order-set was in place in which cisplatin 60 mg/m2, 5FU 600 mg/m2 and docetaxel 60 mg/m2 was given three weekly. Tumor response was calculated retrospectively using RECIST criteria. Results: One hundred and ninety-one patients were included the study. The median age was 55 years (23 to 76), 74% were male, and 82% were chemo-naive. Eighty percent of the patients were metastatic at the time of diagnosis. The median number of cycles administered was 6 (2-10). Hematological toxicity was mild with grade 3/4 granulocytopenia in 25% of the patients, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 4% of the patients, and grade 3/4 anemia in 9% of the patients. Neutropenic infection occurred in 9 (%5) patients. Grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting was reported by 10% of the patients, and diarrhea by 7%. A total of 19 (10%) patients had dose delays or dose reductions related to toxicity. Six (3%) patients had complete response and 43 (23%) patients had partial response. Stable disease were occurred in 83 (45%) patients and 56 (23%) progressive disease. Ninety percent of the patients have died with median follow-up of 8 months. Progression-free survival was 7 months (95% CI 6 to 7.8 m) and overall survival was 10 months (95% CI 8.7 to 11.2 m). Conclusions: mDCF has mild hematological toxicity and overall excellent tolerance in first line metastatic gastric cancer patients. Response rate and the survival of these patients with a minimal toxicity are comparable with the original dose DCF.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4046-4046
Author(s):  
Kenji Kunieda ◽  
Akitaka Makiyama ◽  
Masaaki Noguchi ◽  
Takeshi Kajiwara ◽  
Takao Tamura ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 384-384
Author(s):  
Esha Jafa ◽  
Biswajit Dubashi ◽  
Smita Kayal ◽  
Vikram Kate ◽  
Rajesh Nachiappa Ganesh ◽  
...  

384 Background: Aspirin was long known to prevent cancer, the last decade revealed its therapeutic role via varied mechanisms like inhibition of platelet activation, COX and PI3K pathway. Since PI3K/AKT/mTOR is one of the pathways activated in gastric cancer and Giampieri et al (2016) showed improved response rates, PFS and OS with addition of aspirin to capecitabine in heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer,a cancer in which efficacy of aspirin is related to presence of PI3K mutations,we aimed to compare the efficacy of aspirin added to a standard regime EOX with EOX alone in locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer. Methods: All patients with advanced gastric cancer coming to JIPMER,Department of Medical oncology between march 2017 to may 2019 were screened for eligibility in the trial.Those eligible were randomly assigned to standard EOX or standard EOX plus 150 mg of daily aspirin.Tumor measurements were performed at baseline,then after 3-4 cycles (interim response) and the response to treatment was assessed by the radiologist who was blinded to treatment arms according to RECIST1.1 criteria.Toxicity profiles were recorded as per CTCAE v 4.03.In per protocol analysis,response rates, PFS(progression free survival) and OS (overall analysis) were analysed for patients who received ≥3 cycles and had an evaluable interim response. Results: 95 patients were randomised.In per protocol analysis, 70 patients were included. The results are shown in table. Conclusions: No statistically significant difference was seen with respect to response rates, PFS, OS and toxicity, although there was a higher ORR (overall response rate=complete response,CR +partial response, PR) and OS seen in EOX plus aspirin arm. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2017/11/010651. JIPMER,Puducherry,India [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document