Evaluating high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of outcome following radical prostatectomy

4612 Background: The presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) has been associated with future development of prostate cancer. High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in other malignancies is associated with adverse outcome. This study examines the relationship between the presence of HGPIN in prostatectomy specimens, biochemical disease free survival (bDFS) and other cancer specific outcomes following radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Methods: The Columbia University Urologic Oncology Database was reviewed and 2,522 were identified who had undergone radical prostatectomy from 1988 to 2005; 2,133 patients with or without HGPIN were included. Two-sample proportion analysis of means with 95% confidence intervals and ANOVA techniques were used to evaluate the relationship between HGPIN and pathologic stage, Gleason sum, perineural invasion, multifocality, extracapsular extension (ECE), margin status, and nodal status. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model controlling for preoperative PSA, Gleason sum and pathologic stage were used to assess differences in bDFS. Results: 1,885 of 2,133 (88.4%) patients demonstrated HGPIN. There was no significant difference in the distribution of pathologic stage or Gleason sum between the patients with and without HGPIN. The HGPIN-positive group had higher rates of perineural invasion (69.9 vs. 57.5%; p = 0.003), multifocality (63.0 vs. 38.4%; p = 0.000) and ECE (56.4% vs. 48.4%; p = 0.059). There was no statistically significant difference observed in nodal status or margin status between the two groups. Patients without HGPIN had an increased bDFS demonstrated by a predicted disease free survival of 73.6% versus 67.0% at 9 years (p = 0.045) with a median follow-up of 50 months. In the multivariate Cox hazard model HGPIN, PSA, Gleason sum and pathologic stage were validated as independent predictors of failure (p < 0.001). The risk of failure was 1.9 × greater in the HGPIN-positive group than the HGPIN-negative group (p=0.006). Conclusions: The presence of HGPIN in the radical prostatectomy specimen denotes a significantly higher rate of tumor multifocality, perineural invasion, ECE, and ultimately biochemical recurrence. No significant financial relationships to disclose.